Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Republic guys...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2010 | 06:47 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: A318/319 pic
Default

Originally Posted by sizzlechest
It is flying on the YX certificate. All YX flying is to be done by pilots covered by RAH CBA. Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong. This is why they should refuse the flying as they are HELPING bust up the RAH CBA/pilot group.... they are helping MGT in a war AGAINST the pilot group by refusing to follow CBA.
It is amazing how you justify your shortcomings but show no tolerance when others do the same thing. Divisive and illegal and wrong are very strong words. Thankfully RAH pilots and the IBT are righteous and beyond reproach so you can educate the rest of us.
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 07:50 AM
  #32  
Flyboyrw's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Lawn Chair
Default

Originally Posted by FLEX
It is amazing how you justify your shortcomings but show no tolerance when others do the same thing. Divisive and illegal and wrong are very strong words. Thankfully RAH pilots and the IBT are righteous and beyond reproach so you can educate the rest of us.
Exactly, getting a taste of their own medicine.

Sucks when you get screwed doesn't it?
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 08:22 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

The irony of my post is that the same wheel keeps going around and around and around. People will ***** when it's against them and then defend it when it helps them. i don't really care what happens it doesn't affect me, i am not RAH. i am glad to know that the new EXCO is starting to make a change and be more open. maybe it will trigger expedited arbitration for a new CBA or something as it should be classified as a major violation or dispute. We will see what happens. my buddy said that Midwest asked for 2 more days extension on the SLI closing briefs... and those guys *****ed about RAH dragging feet.... irony.
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 08:47 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Did you actually expect a different result? I personally thought the captains had a chance at a raise, but the first officers pay is based on "all jet aircraft." You are also looking at probably close to 5 years until you see a new contract if not longer.
This is a little scary. Hopefully it doesn't take 5 years, but when we get the SLI finished and get approved for single carrier status, we will need to get the IBT out of there. You want it to take 5 years, stay with the IBT.

Vote RAPA
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 09:24 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by sizzlechest
It is flying on the YX certificate. All YX flying is to be done by pilots covered by RAH CBA. Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong. This is why they should refuse the flying as they are HELPING bust up the RAH CBA/pilot group.... they are helping MGT in a war AGAINST the pilot group by refusing to follow CBA.
There is no YX certificate.
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 09:49 AM
  #36  
Trogdor's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: 75/76 FO
Default

Originally Posted by sizzlechest
It is flying on the YX certificate. All YX flying is to be done by pilots covered by RAH CBA. Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong. This is why they should refuse the flying as they are HELPING bust up the RAH CBA/pilot group.... they are helping MGT in a war AGAINST the pilot group by refusing to follow CBA.
This from a guy who is stealing jobs from the Midwest pilots. You're a real class act.
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 04:07 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dougdrvr
There is no YX certificate.

the ATA code now =Republic Airlines Inc., hence the YX certificate

Last edited by sizzlechest; 09-19-2010 at 04:08 PM. Reason: typo
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 04:09 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trogdor
This from a guy who is stealing jobs from the Midwest pilots. You're a real class act.
read all the posts first ,I said i wasn't RAH....
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 04:35 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by sizzlechest
the ATA code now =Republic Airlines Inc., hence the YX certificate
There is no YX certificate. It was turned in to the FAA. I didn't think it was possible but, ostensibly, you can have an ATA code (YX) without an air carrier certificate.
Reply
Old 09-19-2010 | 05:50 PM
  #40  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HawkerJet
Nope, if you have a dog in this fight look into it.
I've read with my own eyes a .pdf copy of the unions official response to the company wanting to do this. Perhaps you should do some digging yourself.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaxQ
Regional
3
10-27-2009 01:48 PM
Flyboyrw
Frontier
257
09-19-2009 07:18 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
par8head
Regional
69
06-25-2009 12:47 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
40
11-11-2006 02:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices