Republic guys...
09-19-2010 | 05:54 PM
#41
Che Guevara
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
09-19-2010 | 08:29 PM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Lynx pilots are not on the RAH SL yet. They cannot fly the Q if it is on the YX certificate. They should then refuse to fly the Q that they are not qualified to do. There are no provisions to have 2 separate pilot groups under in airline certificate. For Lynx to fly that is divisive and illegal and wrong.
I for one would like to know what the IBT's response really was.
09-19-2010 | 09:16 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Listen, I'm no fan of the IBT in general but I at least believe the new leadership that they're fighting this. The new EXCO has shown good communication & a no bullspit attitude.
09-20-2010 | 05:22 AM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: E-170
from what is on our union board it sounds like the company mentioned something about bringing Q's onto the RW certificate but didnt explain what all was going to be involved. The Union said we would be interesting in discussing the situation, and the company apparently took that as do what ever you want. the Union has since sent a letter saying that they did not approve what is going on and that the company is once again violating several sections of our contract.
09-20-2010 | 07:20 AM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
from what is on our union board it sounds like the company mentioned something about bringing Q's onto the RW certificate but didnt explain what all was going to be involved. The Union said we would be interesting in discussing the situation, and the company apparently took that as do what ever you want. the Union has since sent a letter saying that they did not approve what is going on and that the company is once again violating several sections of our contract.
09-20-2010 | 10:44 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
The Q's are on the Lynx certificate, we are the only ones flying them and we are qualified. What you've said show's no knowledge about what has happened to the Midwest pilots. Easy to fix, eliminate one group, no more conflict. Since you have no dog in this fight by your own admission, disappear.
TD is it possible for the IBT to say one thing and do another?
I for one would like to know what the IBT's response really was.
TD is it possible for the IBT to say one thing and do another?
I for one would like to know what the IBT's response really was.
you are qualified...? What is your RAH SL #? I wasn't aware the arbitrator had decided.... cuz he hasn't. You are not qualified to fly the Q at YX.... is it really that hard to understand? As far as Midwest, none of those planes were xfered over to any RAH carrier. They were returned. The Midwest thing does not apply here. I can comment on all I like... that's what's fun about BBSs!
09-20-2010 | 11:02 AM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: B756 FO
you are qualified...? What is your RAH SL #? I wasn't aware the arbitrator had decided.... cuz he hasn't. You are not qualified to fly the Q at YX.... is it really that hard to understand? As far as Midwest, none of those planes were xfered over to any RAH carrier. They were returned. The Midwest thing does not apply here. I can comment on all I like... that's what's fun about BBSs!
09-20-2010 | 08:46 PM
#50
Che Guevara
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
What's so difficult here? The letter from the union to the company, as well as the letter from the company to the union are posted for us to see. You can't make moves like this based on verbal consent. Nothing was ever signed. They weren't for and never have been.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
