Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown >

Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010 | 07:01 AM
  #371  
ebl14's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 933
Likes: 80
From: 73N
Default

Problems with dual qualification.

1. Training. As already posted what happens if you have been flying the 200 for the last 3 months but the only sim available for your PC is a 900?

2. Fewer higher paying positions. The main point of dual qualification to the company is to have fewer 900 awards. A 900 awarded pilot will have their vacation, sick time, min guarantee etc in 900 pay. A 200 awarded pilot will have all of this pay on the 200 rate even though they may fly the 900 60% of the time.

3. Fewer positions overall. The added efficiency of dual qualification will require less pilots. That means we will be run even thinner than we currently are. That means we are that much closer to furlough/downgrades if we see stagnation or less flying in the future.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The language of the dual qualification in TA1 was terrible. Correct me if I am not accurate, but I believe the number of 900 awarded positions was somewhere in the range of ~3.5 positions per airframe after the last phase. If we staff the 200 closer to ~5.0 when we aren't run down to the bone that is an average of ~1.5 captain and first officer slots that will be paid at the 200 rate as a baseline but be primarily 900 positions. How is Mesaba staffed on the 900? I'd be willing to bet that you guys are staffed well over 5 crews per aircraft? How many high paying positions will you be losing?

Even if the dual qualification section required 7 awarded 900 crews per airframe you would still have the problem with training. Strong language would be needed to protect you from training in an aircraft you havent flown for a long period of time. At that point you have to ask yourself, if I don't want to take a PC in that aircraft, should I really be flying it full of people?
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 08:19 AM
  #372  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by xjsaab
You should be helping the company to the fullest extent that our union contract allows. It cracks me up when people screw the performance numbers on purpose and then get ****ed when the company won't pay better. This is business, pure and simple. If you feel like a slave get a new job. Otherwise show up and fly the contract.

The more profitable the company the more money we can negotiate for. I've flown both the 200 & 900 it's easy to transition between the two. As stated in a earlier post: Pay based off seniority would nullify any issues with sick leave, disability etc. UPS does this already.

The union comes to the table realizing the different scenarios and their cost vs benefits. This isn't caving to the company without anything in return. Part of negotiating is give and take. We'll cut your costs, but we get a percentage of that cost to increase our benefits.


My question to you if the union could negotiate
1) more days off, better pay with a dual qual pilot group
vs
2) lower pay, less days off with two fleet groups

Which would you choose?
I don't get this at all, basically you want people who where 900 pilots to come to work and take a pay cut on one day(fly the200), then fly the 900 on another at their normal rates on another day?
Are you nuts?
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 09:53 AM
  #373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: MSP CA
Default

deleted.......................
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 10:15 AM
  #374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: SAAB
Default

Originally Posted by BladeRunner
I don't get this at all, basically you want people who where 900 pilots to come to work and take a pay cut on one day(fly the200), then fly the 900 on another at their normal rates on another day?
Are you nuts?
Please reread my post that you quoted. My answer to your question is already there.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 11:52 AM
  #375  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Well, if the company is dead set on dual qual, then what are we willing to get in return?

A high blended rate?

Higher guarantee?

More 401k matching?

Or is dual qual going to kill this?
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 12:07 PM
  #376  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
Well, if the company is dead set on dual qual, then what are we willing to get in return?

A high blended rate?

Higher guarantee?

More 401k matching?

Or is dual qual going to kill this?
How about...
All pay and benefits are based on the highest rate the individual is qualified on PLUS an override for the extra work to maintain proficiency in multiple aircraft.

IF they want it that bad, make them pay.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 04:01 PM
  #377  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

Why is the Q400 rate the same as the crj 200. It should be the same as the 900. Growth is in the 900 and the Q400, that is where we should push for higher pay rates.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 05:05 PM
  #378  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Originally Posted by yodafly
Why is the Q400 rate the same as the crj 200. It should be the same as the 900. Growth is in the 900 and the Q400, that is where we should push for higher pay rates.
Because it's a turboprop, and everyone knows jet drivers are better pilots and should be compensated better.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 06:24 PM
  #379  
jeeps's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: My name is Roger Murdock, I'm the copilot!
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
Because it's a turboprop, and everyone knows jet drivers are better pilots and should be compensated better.

hell yes!
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 06:27 PM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: MSP CA
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
Well, if the company is dead set on dual qual, then what are we willing to get in return?

A high blended rate?

Higher guarantee?

More 401k matching?

Or is dual qual going to kill this?
The problem with dual qual is that it touches almost all parts of the contract. So even if we do get a good contract with the JCBA, dual qual can darken the waters.

I don't know what the right answers are as far as what we should get in return, but rest assured, PNCL management is going to want Dual Qual!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8tordude
Mesa Airlines
51
09-13-2010 07:49 AM
Fireball
Cargo
37
04-28-2010 11:17 AM
flycrj200
Regional
40
01-27-2009 09:53 AM
mike734
Hangar Talk
35
04-08-2008 09:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices