Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown
#421
Really?
I didn't realize that, I thought it was a system wide vote, I'll have to pull up the fastreads again.
#422
The Colgan reps are level headed and sharp folks- I really don't see them taking a "Torpedo NO" to a JCBA unless it was something horrendous, which inherently would not pass the MSA or PCL MEC's. The beauty of a JNC comprised of all 3 groups is each group is able to ensure their MEC's needs, wants, and desires are being looked into while the deal comes together. In speaking with the members of the JNC many times I think all the pilots are in great hands at the table. It's a matter of time to see if all the pieces can come together.
#424
Guys I dont understand why everyone is getting so bent out of shape and how non mesaba guys are telling them that they are not going to get anything. You have to understand that PNCL needs this contract. Until November 15th is here and we are told that we are a long ways off, why not have some hope that this place is changing? I see no reason why are union is not going after a good contract that everyone will be happy with. I personally thing that PNCL knew this was going to happen a long time ago and tried to delay as long as possible to be in this situation, and for them they got what they want and now they will be negotating seriously for the first time. The failed TA was a gift to us and now i believe that the mec's of 9e xj, and 9l are going to get us something good.
#425
#426
This is from the MEC Protocol statement:
6. Within 29 days after a full language Tentative Agreement (TA) has been reached on a JCBA, the PCL, MSA and CJC MECs shall convene in a joint session to receive a briefing on the TA from the JNC and staff. Immediately following this briefing, the three MECs shall then convene in separate MEC meetings and each MEC shall decide whether to approve the TA for a membership ratification vote. If all three MECs approve the TA for a membership ratification vote, the JCBA TA will be then promptly be submitted for a combined membership ratification vote of the three pilot groups.
Last edited by Bartok; 11-01-2010 at 07:57 PM.
#427
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
I'm by no mean a lawyer, and I am very thankful to my union reps for organizing and learning everything they do, because all of this is mind boggling at times.
This is from the MEC Protocol statement:
A combined membership ratification vote means to me that we all vote as one group, but I could be mistaken.
This is from the MEC Protocol statement:
A combined membership ratification vote means to me that we all vote as one group, but I could be mistaken.
#428
For clarification in your "reducible" comment- are your referring to the company's ability to JA/extend into days off or the pilot's ability to pick up down in days off? I know you mention picking up an overnight but are you considering all days off "golden" in that you cannot be touched and you would like 12 with the ability to pick up 2 (to include an overnight)? Currently you are limited to 1 day, which is where this discussion's heart is based.
I would personally say that there should not be ANY forced JM. If you don't have enough people, recall the furloughs or hire. I don't care if they can call to ask but there should be NO penalty for saying nope not interested.
I want to see, as far as the company/scheduling is concerned 12 days is the minimum, period. If I choose to drop down, fine. And yes once my schedule is published, the off days are OFF. No floating off days to bail them out for poor staffing or a lousy planning department.
Yes currently anyone with an 11 day off line is limited to only picking up a day trip. The problem is at least on the jet, there are no worthwhile day trips and no way to cherrypick anything off a longer pairing because almost everything leaves the base first leg day one and doesn't come back til last leg day four. Day trips scheduling creates end up with deadheads (that only pay 50% so they still don't usually go over min day, but that's another fight.)
#429
Mesaba can junior man but then you are entitled to a "comp day" basically, you get, with agreement of scheduling, to then drop a day on the front or back of a stretch of days.
I would personally say that there should not be ANY forced JM. If you don't have enough people, recall the furloughs or hire. I don't care if they can call to ask but there should be NO penalty for saying nope not interested.
I want to see, as far as the company/scheduling is concerned 12 days is the minimum, period. If I choose to drop down, fine. And yes once my schedule is published, the off days are OFF. No floating off days to bail them out for poor staffing or a lousy planning department.
Yes currently anyone with an 11 day off line is limited to only picking up a day trip. The problem is at least on the jet, there are no worthwhile day trips and no way to cherrypick anything off a longer pairing because almost everything leaves the base first leg day one and doesn't come back til last leg day four. Day trips scheduling creates end up with deadheads (that only pay 50% so they still don't usually go over min day, but that's another fight.)
I would personally say that there should not be ANY forced JM. If you don't have enough people, recall the furloughs or hire. I don't care if they can call to ask but there should be NO penalty for saying nope not interested.
I want to see, as far as the company/scheduling is concerned 12 days is the minimum, period. If I choose to drop down, fine. And yes once my schedule is published, the off days are OFF. No floating off days to bail them out for poor staffing or a lousy planning department.
Yes currently anyone with an 11 day off line is limited to only picking up a day trip. The problem is at least on the jet, there are no worthwhile day trips and no way to cherrypick anything off a longer pairing because almost everything leaves the base first leg day one and doesn't come back til last leg day four. Day trips scheduling creates end up with deadheads (that only pay 50% so they still don't usually go over min day, but that's another fight.)
#430
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
I find it amazing that people on this board think its ok to fly a 74 seat plane for 50 seat rates. Don't forget you may be flying the Q400 soon.
I will look at the whole deal when it comes out and vote based on all the issues just like everyone else....but lets face it PAY is one of the biggest issue in a contract.
I will look at the whole deal when it comes out and vote based on all the issues just like everyone else....but lets face it PAY is one of the biggest issue in a contract.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



