Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown >

Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle/Colgan/Mesaba TA Countdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2010, 08:49 AM
  #431  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by yodafly View Post
I find it amazing that people on this board think its ok to fly a 74 seat plane for 50 seat rates. Don't forget you may be flying the Q400 soon.

I will look at the whole deal when it comes out and vote based on all the issues just like everyone else....but lets face it PAY is one of the biggest issue in a contract.
I think pay is important also, we should be compensated for the important job we are doing.

There are way more issues than just pay scales to look at, and we are not getting them all fixed in this negotiation.

Companies pay Turboprops less then jets, it's a battle we must wage, but not this time.

We need to get the best rates overall that we can get out of this negotiation.

If the -200 pays very well, the Q400 will pay well.

XJ rates are a good starting point, don't expect much more than that.
Bartok is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 09:24 AM
  #432  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 691
Default

Originally Posted by higney85 View Post
In the end we are in the same boat as far as days off- you cannot be forced to fly in any of them after your bid is out. The concern is the min day off (you want 12, what is in negotiations is 11). The issue still remains in what you are "allowed" to work voluntarily. By what I am reading from you the idea of 12 min and ability to work down to 10 with a pickup (to include the overnight- I understand what you are saying about day trips being a hard find). Mesaba has limits on what you can pick up, PCL does not. That is the difference here.
I realize we aren't going to get a SWA style contract with 15 days off, or whatever they get, but currently the "negotiations" are at 11? That is a huge disappointment. How is this negotiating? We already get 11 days off. Negiotating is asking for 2 extra days off and then compromising at 12. Keeping the status quo on uniform pay and per diem and days off, where are the small gains I kept hearing about?
jayray2 is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 09:31 AM
  #433  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by jayray2 View Post
I realize we aren't going to get a SWA style contract with 15 days off, or whatever they get, but currently the "negotiations" are at 11? That is a huge disappointment. How is this negotiating? We already get 11 days off. Negiotating is asking for 2 extra days off and then compromising at 12. Keeping the status quo on uniform pay and per diem and days off, where are the small gains I kept hearing about?
If you get our healthcare that will be a big gain for you. If you get our commuter policy that allows other airlines to count towards the two that is a gain. If you get our vacation slide policy that is a gain. Those items are not gains for us, that is what we already have.

I would like mesabas days off. I would like to have mesabas min day. I would like to have mesabas retirement. Those are not gains for mesaba, they already have that.

combine the two and everyone gets some of the same and some of the gains.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 09:37 AM
  #434  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport View Post
If you get our healthcare that will be a big gain for you. If you get our commuter policy that allows other airlines to count towards the two that is a gain. If you get our vacation slide policy that is a gain. Those items are not gains for us, that is what we already have.

I would like mesabas days off. I would like to have mesabas min day. I would like to have mesabas retirement. Those are not gains for mesaba, they already have that.

combine the two and everyone gets some of the same and some of the gains.
And this is probably really close to what the TA will look like.

Throw in XJ rates plus a little bump........

I'd vote yes.

Last edited by Bartok; 11-01-2010 at 09:48 AM.
Bartok is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 10:00 AM
  #435  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 320
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok View Post
And this is probably really close to what the TA will look like.

Throw in XJ rates plus a little bump........

I'd vote yes.
To each there own, but that would not be enough for me to vote yes. I think it is going to take more than that to sway the XJ guys..
RightSide is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 10:23 AM
  #436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by RightSide View Post
To each there own, but that would not be enough for me to vote yes. I think it is going to take more than that to sway the XJ guys..
Maybe.

But I believe that if this TA doesn't go backwards for XJ, and after the MEC explains the gains it is for 9E, that it will pass.

None of these MEC guys are going to sign off on something that one group will like and the other absolutely hates.

Last edited by Bartok; 11-01-2010 at 12:34 PM.
Bartok is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 01:53 PM
  #437  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by RightSide View Post
To each there own, but that would not be enough for me to vote yes. I think it is going to take more than that to sway the XJ guys..
so whats it going to take to sway the xj guys?
Airsupport is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 02:11 PM
  #438  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,085
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport View Post
so whats it going to take to sway the xj guys?
At a minimum, restoring us to where we would be now without the bankruptcy. And that includes somehow either getting rid of PBS or one way or another making up the significant hit in pay that has caused many of us. Then mixing in things from there.
Avroman is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 02:47 PM
  #439  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Default

What abut 12 days off on months with 31 calendar days( that would occur 7 times next year) and 11 days off with months with less than 31...something maybe to entertain...BTW Time Off Without Pay offered at Mesaba today for all Saab pilots and MSP CRJ900 FO's
djrogs03 is offline  
Old 11-01-2010, 02:53 PM
  #440  
Gets Weekends Off
 
indapit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by higney85 View Post
In the end we are in the same boat as far as days off- you cannot be forced to fly in any of them after your bid is out. The concern is the min day off (you want 12, what is in negotiations is 11). The issue still remains in what you are "allowed" to work voluntarily. By what I am reading from you the idea of 12 min and ability to work down to 10 with a pickup (to include the overnight- I understand what you are saying about day trips being a hard find). Mesaba has limits on what you can pick up, PCL does not. That is the difference here.
Wasn't ALPA created to promote safety. You cannot tell me that allowing pilots to take themselves down to 4 days off a month is safe. ALPA creates restrictions on the company to promote safety as well as its own pilots. You can take a CRJ up to FL410 but it does not mean you should allow everyone to do so.

Furthermore, the company will then plan on pilots to be picking up opentime, so in the end, why would they properly staff the airline. If Pinnacle and Colgan used Mesaba staffing models and work rules, it would create roughly 1.5 new jobs for every Pinnalce and Colgan aircraft. That is more upgrades and more jobs.

Just because it is legal, doesn't mean it is right. Maybe we should hold ourselves to a little higher standard than the FAA.
indapit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8tordude
Mesa Airlines
51
09-13-2010 07:49 AM
Fireball
Cargo
37
04-28-2010 11:17 AM
flycrj200
Regional
40
01-27-2009 09:53 AM
mike734
Hangar Talk
35
04-08-2008 09:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices