Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
December 9E/XJ/9L TA Poll >

December 9E/XJ/9L TA Poll

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines
View Poll Results: I will vote... (XJ/9E/9L pilots only, please)
For the TA
95
66.43%
Against the TA
35
24.48%
I will not vote
4
2.80%
Undecided
9
6.29%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

December 9E/XJ/9L TA Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2010 | 06:48 PM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

Work Rules look good.

The fact that the Rates on the Q400 are less then the 50 seat RJ is a disgrace.

Something to think about since this is were the growth will be. There will be allot more than just Colgan pilots hurt by these rates as upgrades will be into this plane.
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 07:03 PM
  #62  
AxialFlow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Default

Guys, the Colgan pilots don't have enough votes to sway the outcome. If you feel the split saab rates are not a good idea...contact the CJC MEC and voice your concerns. They are the only ones that can make a difference.

(I know...I know...they're going to vote YES anyway, but at least you can say you participated in this whole sham of a one-sided "democratic" process...)
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 07:24 PM
  #63  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

It's important to point out that if I were to bid over to the Saab as a current Mesaba crj pilot, I would not get the grandfathered rate. That is a rate only for current XJ pilots who are on the Saab and will save the company $X amount of dollars for a training event by staying on the Saab.
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 07:26 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by shimmydamp
I don't think it's impossible for a prop to make more than a jet. But I do think that the task will be much easier when there aren't three negotiating committees trying to blend together 3 cultures to produce a TA that results in gains for every pilot group.
It will not be easier in 5 years. How is the company going to feel different about raising the rates then than they do now? I really don't see how it has anything to do with the company to be honest. They have a finacial value they can support and be a viable company. Why in the world would they care where the money goes. If ALPA went to them and said we will pay all our jet pilots 1 dollar an hour and the q 100 an hour. If it fit in their financial plans they wouldn't care.

The time to fix things is never in the future. It's always now.
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 07:33 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PapaMike
Way to defeatist. Saying that we deserve to get payed less because we already are getting payed less is what got the airline industry in the position in the first place. And if that argument held ANY water, I would point out that pinnacle pilots were also payed less than mesaba pilots for the same work on the same equipment and are now going to be getting the same. Why isn't that in question? Good for the goose...

And as for getting mesaba's pay anyway if we vote no: If we don't get this contract signed then as of the 12 month anniversary of the merger announcement we are to be taken into mesaba's contract. Therefore we will get their current work rules and pay.
Where did you get that idea? I've never heard that before... If you vote no.. you keep what you have.. Why would you get Mesaba's current contract? Maybe if that really were the case, I'd see your point. Might as well renegotiate off of only Mesaba's contract in a year.. but I don't think that's the way it works at all unless I missed something....
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 07:49 PM
  #66  
AxialFlow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
It's important to point out that if I were to bid over to the Saab as a current Mesaba crj pilot, I would not get the grandfathered rate.
And I don't feel that is right...you SHOULD get the current "grandfathered" rate. It's not right for the XJ saab guys in the right seat of the who want to go to the left seat to have to switch payscales.
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 08:00 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueskies21
Where did you get that idea? I've never heard that before... If you vote no.. you keep what you have.. Why would you get Mesaba's current contract? Maybe if that really were the case, I'd see your point. Might as well renegotiate off of only Mesaba's contract in a year.. but I don't think that's the way it works at all unless I missed something....
In the current mesaba contract there is a provision that speaks about mergers. They are supposed to get 12 months to get a new contract or mesabas will take precidence over colgan and we are supposed to be given their contract.
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 08:02 PM
  #68  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Originally Posted by PapaMike
In the current mesaba contract there is a provision that speaks about mergers. They are supposed to get 12 months to get a new contract or mesabas will take precidence over colgan and we are supposed to be given their contract.
Wrong.

Read my post to you in the other thread.
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 08:04 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PapaMike
In the current mesaba contract there is a provision that speaks about mergers. They are supposed to get 12 months to get a new contract or mesabas will take precidence over colgan and we are supposed to be given their contract.
Only if we're merged... What if they say... ok so we'd rather have Mesaba's name and operating certificate and since the Colgan guys don't want to play ball we're going to close down Colgan and anyone who wants a job can come on over to Mesaba... The protections in Mesaba's contract don't protect YOU as a Colgan pilot... Pinnacle Management said their intention was to merge the two airlines... maybe their intention changes and they dissolve Colgan... This really circles back to the bird in the hand being worth two in the bush... or put another way... better the devil you know than the devil you don't...
Reply
Old 12-21-2010 | 08:10 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueskies21
Only if we're merged... What if they say... ok so we'd rather have Mesaba's name and operating certificate and since the Colgan guys don't want to play ball we're going to close down Colgan and anyone who wants a job can come on over to Mesaba... The protections in Mesaba's contract don't protect YOU as a Colgan pilot... Pinnacle Management said their intention was to merge the two airlines... maybe their intention changes and they dissolve Colgan... This really circles back to the bird in the hand being worth two in the bush... or put another way... better the devil you know than the devil you don't...
APLA policy won't allow for that to happen.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAPTAINPCL
Regional
9
10-31-2010 07:18 PM
nwaf16dude
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
11-14-2008 01:38 PM
ERJ135
Hangar Talk
4
09-01-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices