Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

2014-2015 outlook

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2011, 06:43 AM
  #31  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

Originally Posted by stbloc View Post
I don't think 1500 rule will hold. Majors haven't even announce hiring and regional are starting to run thin on applicants. What will happen when majors start pulling pilots from the regional level? Delta will be on a steady pace of 500 new hires a year going forward along with US Air and others. At the pace of the major's projected numbers I feel you will see a shortage at the regional level. No way 1500 will hold up. If you think this spring was crazy you haven't see nothing yet.
I hate to say it but you're right. Unless the economy collapses even more dramatically than last time there are not going to be enough part 91/135 ATP's to keep the regionals in business once mainline hiring starts...even if there were, many of them would not work for regional wages!
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 01:17 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
teddyballgame's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 220
Default

Originally Posted by slumav505 View Post
I haven't heard even as much as a peep regarding this. Seems like 65 is about it.
Actually, I've heard quite a bit of talk about raising the retirement age to 70. And most of that talk is coming from -- surprise! -- the over-60 pilots.

Apparently, five more years (at your expense) isn't enough.

Or, as someone so succinctly described this attitude: "I got mine... Now I want yours."

The good news is, I believe the Age 65 rule is an ICAO standard; so the ATA just can't call up the FAA and say, "Change it."
teddyballgame is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 02:35 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

You folks do realize that the U.S. is one of the nations that is an ICAO member, right?

http://www.pegasusrotorcraft.com/sup...mberStates.pdf
The Dominican is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 02:38 PM
  #34  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,544
Default

People keep assuming that the only option the major airlines have when/if this huge pilot shortage hits is to suck everyone out of the regionals and either end the regionals or seriously change the current system. There is another, much more dangerous option out there, however, which entails continuing to shrink the majors while expanding the domestic flying that regionals do. That is managements wet dream right there - lots of C-series and E-195's flying for wages that are dirt. It's not a foregone conclusion, but it's one that we all need to keep a lookout for and hope that all the majors at a minimum hold the line on their scope, if not tighten it even further.
tennisguru is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 03:30 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
slumav505's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 456
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru View Post
People keep assuming that the only option the major airlines have when/if this huge pilot shortage hits is to suck everyone out of the regionals and either end the regionals or seriously change the current system. There is another, much more dangerous option out there, however, which entails continuing to shrink the majors while expanding the domestic flying that regionals do. That is managements wet dream right there - lots of C-series and E-195's flying for wages that are dirt. It's not a foregone conclusion, but it's one that we all need to keep a lookout for and hope that all the majors at a minimum hold the line on their scope, if not tighten it even further.
This is the key to everything right here. They can only do what we let them do. The entire bottom feeding regional industry can be taken care of in the next 10 years if we collectively as pilots step up to the plate, work together and do not budge on scope one inch. Establish an industry standard of 50 seats or less, with a maximum radius of 200 miles (straight line distance) en-route with populations under 200,000 people in a 50 mile radius of the airport being served. That would pretty much do it. Also close the door on multiple certificates under one holdings company. This will prevent regional whipsaws which further lowers pay and QOL. If we take away the ability to screw each other we'll all be happier.
slumav505 is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 03:32 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: CRJ-200 FO
Posts: 44
Default

Even under a scenario in which the regionals take over the 90-120 seat market in the U.S. the majors will still need to hire to replace retiring pilots, although at a reduced rate. If pilots are flowing out of the system faster than they are coming in, and all that is happening is a shuffling of flying rather than a reduction, then there will be a shortage. Although many doubt a shortage, the fact that the regionals are currently having issues attracting qualified applicants after a two+ year dry spell suggests that a serious shortage is looming. The only question is just how severe it will be.

My guess is we will see upward pressure on wages in the years to come. It will never go back to what it was in the late '90s. The pendulum swung too far, and then it swung too far in the other extreme. It is starting to swing back.

There are many challenges ahead, and we are not out of the woods yet. Hardly, with oil nearing $110/barrel. But it is going to be a remarkably different industry in just the next 5 years, and 10 years from now it may be hardly recognizable compared to today.
Panama Jones is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 05:42 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 691
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru View Post
People keep assuming that the only option the major airlines have when/if this huge pilot shortage hits is to suck everyone out of the regionals and either end the regionals or seriously change the current system. There is another, much more dangerous option out there, however, which entails continuing to shrink the majors while expanding the domestic flying that regionals do. That is managements wet dream right there - lots of C-series and E-195's flying for wages that are dirt. It's not a foregone conclusion, but it's one that we all need to keep a lookout for and hope that all the majors at a minimum hold the line on their scope, if not tighten it even further.
If United is just able to keep the tighter of the two scope clauses things will be good. Then maybe Delta can take back some flying. If United fails with the scope battle most of us will probably be Regional lifers as the Majors continue to shrink. Just my opinion.
jayray2 is offline  
Old 04-25-2011, 05:56 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Courtroom
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Not me. Since ICAO was already doing it, it was a forgone conclusion. I'm actually OK with 65. Unless you want to get into VERY complex, invasive, and expensive medical/cognitive testing then you have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere. I think 60 is a little to low and 70 is too high.
I agree with rick, come on guys, have you not seen the way the average 70 year old drives?? I'm not saying all, but most. I'd rather be in the back of the regional with the 20 something Captain than the back of the 75 with the 70 year old flying.... maybe its just me?
citation35hf is offline  
Old 04-26-2011, 07:13 AM
  #39  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by citation35hf View Post
I agree with rick, come on guys, have you not seen the way the average 70 year old drives?? I'm not saying all, but most. I'd rather be in the back of the regional with the 20 something Captain than the back of the 75 with the 70 year old flying.... maybe its just me?
They drive about the same as a 20-something that is phoning or texting.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 04-26-2011, 08:25 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PeezDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: CRJ
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by teddyballgame View Post
Actually, I've heard quite a bit of talk about raising the retirement age to 70. And most of that talk is coming from -- surprise! -- the over-60 pilots.

Apparently, five more years (at your expense) isn't enough.

Or, as someone so succinctly described this attitude: "I got mine... Now I want yours."

The good news is, I believe the Age 65 rule is an ICAO standard; so the ATA just can't call up the FAA and say, "Change it."
God I don't get it. Why do these guys wanna fly until they're dead? Go fish or buy that boat you always wanted or something. Why in God's name would you want to fly until your 70? I for sure won't be one of those. Want to actually enjoy life for a while before I kick the bucket. Go away for Christ sake and get out of our seats. You had your time, now its our turn.
PeezDog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Timeoff2fish
Cargo
9
07-26-2010 05:13 PM
ryan1234
Military
1
02-25-2010 11:29 PM
fireman0174
JetBlue
0
04-13-2006 02:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices