Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
AMR to trim Eagle costs $75 million, 600 cuts >

AMR to trim Eagle costs $75 million, 600 cuts

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

AMR to trim Eagle costs $75 million, 600 cuts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2012, 07:44 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
I tend to agree. One noteworthy aspect of the Eagle term sheet is the inclusion of rates for up to 76-seats and only arbitration if something larger should be flown. It also includes rates for larger turboprops. As such, it would seem they are confident of getting RJ's in the CRJ-700/900 and E-170/175 range to provide feed in the 64-76 mixed class range. The Q400 also seems to have a place. I would expect the above 5 aircraft to be the bulk of the replacement for AA feeders. Horton is open to merge with U, although it would appear he wants to do it after reorganization vs. Parker's before exiting. Regardless, it's then just then a matter of when, not if AA and U start canoodling. U mainline pilots fly E-190's I believe and thus when AA and U merge, it would seem to draw the line at 76-seats for the combined feed operation.
They also have Mesa flying 190s. Delta has 90 seat feed, USAIR has 90 seat feed, and UAL has near unlimited 70 seat feed. AA is miles behind the industry average.
Wingtips is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 07:45 AM
  #72  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips View Post
is that why he was coming up as banned for awhile?
I believe so.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 07:46 AM
  #73  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips View Post
They also have Mesa flying 190s. Delta has 90 seat feed, USAIR has 90 seat feed, and UAL has near unlimited 70 seat feed. AA is miles behind the industry average.
Mesa doesn't fly ANY Embraer aircraft. Delta does NOT have 90 seat feed, nor does UsAir. Seats are restricted to 76 and 86 respectively.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 07:55 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Mesa doesn't fly ANY Embraer aircraft. Delta does NOT have 90 seat feed, nor does UsAir. Seats are restricted to 76 and 86 respectively.
86 mind as well be 90, i mean come on man. Also USAIR has a large amount of these 75/86 seater planes at the regional level. Someone posted this recently, in a graph. Also Delta has a limited amount of 86 seat jets but they have them at mainline. UAL has a boat ton of 70 seat jets allowed.
Wingtips is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:09 AM
  #75  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
I tend to agree. One noteworthy aspect of the Eagle term sheet is the inclusion of rates for up to 76-seats and only arbitration if something larger should be flown. It also includes rates for larger turboprops. As such, it would seem they are confident of getting RJ's in the CRJ-700/900 and E-170/175 range to provide feed in the 64-76 mixed class range. The Q400 also seems to have a place. I would expect the above 5 aircraft to be the bulk of the replacement for AA feeders. Horton is open to merge with U, although it would appear he wants to do it after reorganization vs. Parker's before exiting. Regardless, it's then just then a matter of when, not if AA and U start canoodling. U mainline pilots fly E-190's I believe and thus when AA and U merge, it would seem to draw the line at 76-seats for the combined feed operation.
The same argument can be made with JetBlue and or Alaska! AMR has stated that they could see consolidation in the future but not necessarily with US Airways! PHL doesn't help with the issues AMR is facing in the NE, Delta is attacking AMR hard and fast, 7 flights were added between LGA/DFW this week I believe!
What is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:16 AM
  #76  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips View Post
86 mind as well be 90, i mean come on man. Also USAIR has a large amount of these 75/86 seater planes at the regional level. Someone posted this recently, in a graph. Also Delta has a limited amount of 86 seat jets but they have them at mainline. UAL has a boat ton of 70 seat jets allowed.
The smallest aircraft Delta operates is the DC9-50. It's configured to 125 seats in a 2 class configuration. Delta does not operate any 86 seat jets. The CRJ900's operated for UsAir with 86 seats are in a single class configuration. If AA wants to maintain a 2 class product in their larger RJ's, they'll be forced to fly the CRJ700 at around 66 seats and EMB175/CRJ900 at 76 seats.

UAL may have unlimited 70 seaters, but that is the seat limit....70. No one has scope that allows 90 seats. That's a fact.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:27 AM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by What View Post
The same argument can be made with JetBlue and or Alaska! AMR has stated that they could see consolidation in the future but not necessarily with US Airways! PHL doesn't help with the issues AMR is facing in the NE, Delta is attacking AMR hard and fast, 7 flights were added between LGA/DFW this week I believe!
Code-shares with the above are a certainty and merges at some point with one or both within the realm of possibility. As for the RJ's, AMR will get hundreds of up to 76-seaters, but above that, a limited amount and hopfully none. Remember that for every one of those 76-seaters, means perhaps 10 less new-hire slots at AA. That means much slower attrition from the top at Eagle and if some of Eagle's flying is parted out, that's not good.

In reading the Eagle term sheet, it looks like a current 50-seat topped out E-145 captain will be flying the 76-seater for about the same pay......actually less, considering the guarantee is 5 hours less. The TS ensures those rates via limits till 2016 and then 2016 comparison to the lowest out there till 2020 will mean that snenior topped-out captain will make about $80K/year till 2020. By 2019, if you're lucky enough to be one of those captains, the equivelent earning power in 2012 dollars would be about $50-55K/year, i.e., that pay stays the same, while inflation and increased health care make you 5% poorer every year. If you're stagnated junior to that, well...............

That is the future in store for a large portion of hopful regional pilots at least on the AA and possibly AA/U side as more and more mainline flying is replaced by these aircraft. It's a fabulous deal for airline managers, but the end of a profession for pilots.

Last edited by eaglefly; 03-26-2012 at 10:18 AM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:28 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
The smallest aircraft Delta operates is the DC9-50. It's configured to 125 seats in a 2 class configuration. Delta does not operate any 86 seat jets. The CRJ900's operated for UsAir with 86 seats are in a single class configuration. If AA wants to maintain a 2 class product in their larger RJ's, they'll be forced to fly the CRJ700 at around 66 seats and EMB175/CRJ900 at 76 seats.

UAL may have unlimited 70 seaters, but that is the seat limit....70. No one has scope that allows 90 seats. That's a fact.
What is DELTAS scope on 86 seat jets. Do not pat yourself on the back because a 90 seat airplane is limited to 86 seats!
Wingtips is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:31 AM
  #79  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips View Post
What is DELTAS scope on 86 seat jets. Do not pat yourself on the back because a 90 seat airplane is limited to 86 seats!
DELTA SCOPE DOES NOT ALLOW 86 SEATS!!! I can't type it any louder! Delta scope limits aircraft to 76 seats.

A large RJ is defined by 51-76 seats and a MGTOW of up to 86,000 lbs

Up to 255 large RJs are allowed, of which 153 may be 71-76 seats. Anything over 76 seats IS NOT allowed.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:32 AM
  #80  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
The smallest aircraft Delta operates is the DC9-50. It's configured to 125 seats in a 2 class configuration. Delta does not operate any 86 seat jets. The CRJ900's operated for UsAir with 86 seats are in a single class configuration. If AA wants to maintain a 2 class product in their larger RJ's, they'll be forced to fly the CRJ700 at around 66 seats and EMB175/CRJ900 at 76 seats.

UAL may have unlimited 70 seaters, but that is the seat limit....70. No one has scope that allows 90 seats. That's a fact.
Yep, the -700 does that now and either a -900 or E-175 will do that at exactly 76-seats. AA seeks the greater of 255 or half the domestic fleet. The "gap" then becomes between 76-seats and 126-seats (A319) wheras currently it's between 64-seats and 140 seats. That future smaller gap can be filled by anything rom the 105-seat 737Max down to the 94-seat mixed-class E-190 or possibly a new entrant.
eaglefly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
ToiletDuck
Major
123
10-24-2007 09:05 AM
FDX aviator
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 11:00 AM
AAflyer
Major
24
01-23-2007 12:39 PM
Sir James
Major
4
05-10-2006 01:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices