Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

XJT Whipsaw

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2013 | 05:55 PM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Because in order to do this we would have to negotiate work rules for PBS and have our pilots vote on them.

Yes and you have tried to get our guys to cut language for those rules.

So you have no works rules for either the XJT side or the ASA side. Where we have work rules for the ASA and none for the XJT side.

Would it be easier to negotiate work rules for 1 side since the other already has them? Would it be easier to program changes to a PBS system for 1 side or 2 sides?
Reply
Old 01-23-2013 | 05:59 PM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
I am all for running a parallel phase 1 test bid. I am also all for option 2. If you guys lift your ultimatum next week we can get busy on this.
The company said no in DEC.

With the problems that you are having just on a small scale use at this time do you have enough faith in SP to turn it on for 4700 pilots? Have you fixed the CDO issue?
Reply
Old 01-23-2013 | 06:01 PM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
These ideas were turned down by your MEC.
Lets tell the truth. Company does not want SP on. They know that it will not work in a full bidding cycle with all the pilots in all the bases.
Reply
Old 01-23-2013 | 07:42 PM
  #174  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Nevets, as the saying goes...You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.....

There is absolutely nothing that can stop you guys from using Smartpref for phase 1 just like you are doing for phase 2. Why don't you guys start using Smartpref for phase 1? What is stopping you? Prove us wrong. If it is successful, then your pilots will be as happy as our pilots are with flightline.....What is stopping you? It isn't our MEC.

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Why don't you push your MEC to implement Smartpref for phase 1 bidding? We aren't stopping you. If you guys like it as much as we like flightline, maybe you can convince the majority here.
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Get busy then....We already have done that and are happy with our results...If you can do better, then go ahead and do it and stop talking about it...

This is the essence of the debate....We have a negotiated PBS system that is in use and is liked....You have a theoretical PBS system that hasn't been negotiated, isn't in use, and isn't liked by your own pilots....

Why would we want to swap out a negotiated system that works and is liked for a theoretical system that isn't currently used or liked?

What does it say to our side when your side doesn't even want it?
Originally Posted by Bozo
Yes and you have tried to get our guys to cut language for those rules.

So you have no works rules for either the XJT side or the ASA side. Where we have work rules for the ASA and none for the XJT side.

Would it be easier to negotiate work rules for 1 side since the other already has them? Would it be easier to program changes to a PBS system for 1 side or 2 sides?
You must be like your MEC, not living in the reality of the situation. Why? Because that is what our MEC decided to compromise on to move this merger forward. Despite the line pilots preferring our line bidding, they moved their position to smartpref. Now its up to your MEC to compromise. Or the company will start placing dual class RJs somewhere other than ASA. Anyway, this is all about moving goal posts. Smartpref is being implemented, its bugs are being worked out, its being reprogrammed for our work rules, its being tested for improvements, and its working like its supposed to be to the satisfaction of most. So you have to change your argument which was that it had no customers, its unproven, no work rules, everyone will hate it, etc. Also, its been shown that flight line in its current incarnation would be a decrease in QOL to the XJT side. And that's with vacation low, which has already been conceded. Smartpref doesn't require vacation low so no negotiating capital will be required to keep it in flight line, which like I said, would be a decrease in QOL anyway. Make sense yet?


Originally Posted by Bozo
The company said no in DEC.

With the problems that you are having just on a small scale use at this time do you have enough faith in SP to turn it on for 4700 pilots? Have you fixed the CDO issue?
The company said yes in the summer but your MEC turned dual tracks down back then. Plus, there are no problems with smartpref. The bugs that it does have are being worked out but most everyone that has used it has been happy with it. By the way, flight line didn't have the ability to award lines with CDOs. Our contract doesn't allow building of any lines with it so the CDO reprogram has been put on hold for now. But it was in the works, just not a priority at this time.

Originally Posted by Bozo
Lets tell the truth. Company does not want SP on. They know that it will not work in a full bidding cycle with all the pilots in all the bases.
This is false. They will take smartpref or some watered down version of flight line without vacation low. But they prefer that smartpref comes up with a viable solution the first time without subjective human interaction, manipulation of thresholds, unstacking, sort bias, coin tosses, etc.
Reply
Old 01-24-2013 | 04:54 AM
  #175  
Vertisch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Catching breathe
Default

Vacation low has not been conceded.
Reply
Old 01-24-2013 | 04:11 PM
  #176  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Vacation low has not been conceded.
Maybe not publicly. In any case, you don't think management will want that gone if we stay with flight line? Everything I've heard is, yes. It will take lots of negotiating capital to keep it that can be used somewhere else just to keep something that would be concessionary to the LXJT side.
Reply
Old 01-25-2013 | 04:22 AM
  #177  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Nevets, please stop with the MEC Talking Points. It's so transparent.
Reply
Old 01-25-2013 | 01:10 PM
  #178  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Nevets, please stop with the MEC Talking Points. It's so transparent.
I havent been told or given anything to say on behalf of anyone. And that is what I was saying about some of your guys' post. Every time something goes down, there are a handful of your guys on the pipe all saying and asking the same leading questions.
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 08:09 AM
  #179  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Going back to the beginning of this forum, in my opinion every change have to be to be for good and better or don't even try to change. Taking a dine or penny less of what I'm making now or flying higher capacity aircraft for the same as now. I'm not following the flag****ters on it I say Burn,burn,burn mother....,burn,burn....Now on PBS, SP deal ask everyone that had an opportunity of using both line bidding and PBS which one the will pick 100% of them will use line bidding. The only people supporting PBS is the first 300 top seniority or who'd never used anything else....
Reply
Old 01-26-2013 | 09:27 AM
  #180  
Truman_Sparks's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: CRJ CA
Default

Originally Posted by skygus
Going back to the beginning of this forum, in my opinion every change have to be to be for good and better or don't even try to change. Taking a dine or penny less of what I'm making now or flying higher capacity aircraft for the same as now. I'm not following the flag****ters on it I say Burn,burn,burn mother....,burn,burn....Now on PBS, SP deal ask everyone that had an opportunity of using both line bidding and PBS which one the will pick 100% of them will use line bidding. The only people supporting PBS is the first 300 top seniority or who'd never used anything else....
I'm with you except that part! Line bidding completely, totally, 100% SUCKS compared to pref bidding! It's not even close, and nearly every old ASA pilot agrees. I want NO PART of sorting through 300+ lines every month seeing which one comes closest to what I want in terms of credit, days off, which days I'm working, what time I start and where I overnight! Pref bidding is far superior.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Major
2
06-14-2010 10:00 PM
BoilerUP
Regional
110
09-06-2008 08:11 PM
meritflyer
ExpressJet
70
06-12-2008 09:05 PM
duvie
Regional
50
05-29-2008 09:42 AM
HermannGraf
Regional
49
05-24-2008 11:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices