![]() |
Originally Posted by seattlepilot
(Post 1413392)
From this Republic guy,.i would like to see us finding pilots now. :) better pay / better treatment of employees / better soft money.
. Now that a respectable regional will be hiring into it, Republic are going to have a hard time attracting new applicants. (Unless of course they modify their E175's to include a 3rd lav!) |
I think we all wish we would be flying these for majors with mainline senority numbers but that ship has sailed numerous times. Until the mainline guys decide to bring use onboard, make the best of it.
|
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 1413346)
FWIW, one of our CPs said that he's hearing California Pacific is rumored to get the flying for the 30 E175s. Which could be interesting because they are still doing proving runs. He has heard from the one of the higher ups at TSH that we did not get the flying.
But on the off chance you're serious....UAL is not going to give any flying to an "airline" which does not possess an operating cert and has never flown a single RPM :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Ultralight
(Post 1413394)
Exactly. The only reason new hires are going to RAH right now is because they want to get their hands on that E175.
Totally serious question...are new hires really so attracted to the E-175 over CRJs that they would base their employer preference on that? It's just a 70-ish seat RJ, it doesn't pay better than similar CRJs. From a business perspective, it's a much nicer plane for the pax, but that has nothing to do with the pilots. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 1413425)
Totally serious question...are new hires really so attracted to the E-175 over CRJs that they would base their employer preference on that? It's just a 70-ish seat RJ, it doesn't pay better than similar CRJs.
. |
Originally Posted by Ultralight
(Post 1413434)
Yes, they're out there. I remember back around 2005, guys didn't want to go to Colgan or Mesa because they flew turbo props. Now its the 50 seat jet thats frowned upon. I have heard stories from friends at RAH that new hires have rejected class offeres for the ERJ and Q400 becuase they want to fly the E175. Its the only reason they apply there. Its certainly not for the work rules.
|
When, if at all, would Skywest start hiring to staff these airplanes?
|
Originally Posted by Ultralight
(Post 1413434)
Yes, they're out there. I remember back around 2005, guys didn't want to go to Colgan or Mesa because they flew turbo props. Now its the 50 seat jet thats frowned upon. I have heard stories from friends at RAH that new hires have rejected class offeres for the ERJ and Q400 becuase they want to fly the E175. Its the only reason they apply there. Its certainly not for the work rules.
Yeah I knew about SJS and turboprops, but never imagined that one RJ would be consider better than another RJ because of it's configuration. Wow...toolishness to new heights. |
Originally Posted by coryk
(Post 1413440)
When, if at all, would Skywest start hiring to staff these airplanes?
Since the e-jets will likely go to transitions vice new-hires, they will need to bring new-hires on to replace folks leaving the EMB/CRJ for the e-jet. That would probably need to start hiring this summer to get online by fall. But it also depends on how many e-jets we take early in 2014... if it's only a handful, with most to follow later in 2014, then SKW might not need to hire until they really ramp up (six month lead to allow for two training events). |
Highly unlikely that any new hires will see this aircraft at SkyWest for a while. Plenty of RJ and EMB pilots that will transition to it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands