![]() |
Originally Posted by Redbird611
(Post 1413921)
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
|
Originally Posted by Pilotpip
(Post 1413813)
While the holding company was, it was still a start up certificate with zero experience.
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 1413906)
I do feel that ALPA abuses spending for food and alcohol, but I also feel that it should be a perk for those that do volunteer. But you're right, Ruth Chris Steakhouse is a bit excessive.
If they need nice dinners, change the rules to allow it once a quarter or once a year, whatever your group feels like ponying up for.
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 1413906)
Additionally, I feel that many of the contract provisions that Skywest enjoys comes from ALPA negotiated contracts.
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 1413906)
I suspect that Skywest management will go for concessions at Skywest if ASA/XJT gives in to concessions
|
Originally Posted by sqwkvfr
(Post 1413806)
Your peers voted for it.
Blame, IMHO, goes to 1) DALPA and, mostly, ALPA National for not having a coordinated plan with UAL ALPA, et al, to keep scope under 70. and, 2) the RLA for allowing companies to be able to stall negotiations to infinity. |
Originally Posted by Redbird611
(Post 1413921)
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
|
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 1413848)
That's right because you guys managed to get a whopping $2.00 an hour more for A/C over 50 seats... :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 1413669)
You only need to be cheaper than XJT. If you just hold the line and keep what you have, should be no problem.
It is a lot more than just rates. Tell me you understand that, right? How much more in 401k matching funds do you get? How much more in B fund contributions do you get? How much more in vacation accrual do you get? How much more in sick accrual do you get? How much lower is your share of health care premiums? How much more in perdiem do you get? Etc etc. Really, if you just keep what you already have, your pilot group will continue to be more "cost competitive" than LXJT's.
Originally Posted by eaglepilot6
(Post 1413843)
Really!?!? Only 1 guy gets it? :( This is only an announcement for 40/100. Plus, they have options for 100. Anyone who doesn't think these will be used as management "carrots" to lure ALL SKYW, Inc pilots into accepting concessions is either ignorant, naive, or has zero memory. Wasn't ASA getting the first 900s, anyone? anyone? The email has already come out with management basically saying no growth at ASA or XJT unless concessions. I'm sorry, I mean "cost competitiveness". Plus, the threat of aircraft exiting the CPAs starting this fall. Deja vu all over again I guess.
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 1413906)
I do feel that ALPA abuses spending for food and alcohol, but I also feel that it should be a perk for those that do volunteer. But you're right, Ruth Chris Steakhouse is a bit excessive. Additionally, I feel that many of the contract provisions that Skywest enjoys comes from ALPA negotiated contracts. I suspect that Skywest management will go for concessions at Skywest if ASA/XJT gives in to concessions
Originally Posted by Redbird611
(Post 1413921)
Splitting hairs a bit, but SkyWest pilots don't have any contract provisions. Their work rules, pay, and benefits exist only as long as management allows them to. The only leverage the pilots have is the threat of unionization if the cuts are too deep. Any "negotiations" with the student council are basically for show.
Probably true to a certain point, but for the most part regional compensation is so low compared to the general economy that regionals can't really treat people much worse or they'd just quit...except for those who have a lot of time vested. The only people who really benefit from regional unions are very high-seniority CA's in the six-figure range...I agree without union protection these guys would not be making that kind of money. |
Nevets save your drivel for your dog hes the only one thats listens to you. Why? Because he has no choice! You glow with ignorance when you compare SWA to OO in terms of a union. Leverage? Hows that levearge working for Pinnacle? Oh yeah it didnt they took it up the poop shoot with no say what so ever.
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 1413993)
No, but without an NMB recognized union, you don't have any leverage.
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 1413993)
BH himself said to me on a conference that there are things in the LXJT contract that are not cost competitive.
"just because we don't always get it right doesn't mean we aren't trying........" |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands