AWAC to fly for DL???
10-19-2014 | 09:53 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
The contract extension is AWAC's choice to exersize. Because AWAC loaned money in 2008 and met benchmarks they can extend to 2017..it's not American's call.
AWAC is currently deciding how they want to use the extension. If the DL flying is a reality...it will be interesting to see how the extension is used.
AWAC is currently deciding how they want to use the extension. If the DL flying is a reality...it will be interesting to see how the extension is used.
10-19-2014 | 12:36 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 246
AA doesn't want them anymore, they have their own el cheapo place (PSA) they can place them, and AWAC is taking a pretty big hit to the bottom line if they use the extension.
DAL is also losing a lot of 50's, the CHQ and PCL airframes to name a view. I'd be surprised if it's additional growth at this point however.
Seems like it would just be a lot easier to throw them on the ASA side of the house.
DAL is also losing a lot of 50's, the CHQ and PCL airframes to name a view. I'd be surprised if it's additional growth at this point however.
Seems like it would just be a lot easier to throw them on the ASA side of the house.
10-19-2014 | 01:33 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 4
From: Bus driver
AA doesn't want them anymore, they have their own el cheapo place (PSA) they can place them, and AWAC is taking a pretty big hit to the bottom line if they use the extension.
DAL is also losing a lot of 50's, the CHQ and PCL airframes to name a view. I'd be surprised if it's additional growth at this point however.
Seems like it would just be a lot easier to throw them on the ASA side of the house.
DAL is also losing a lot of 50's, the CHQ and PCL airframes to name a view. I'd be surprised if it's additional growth at this point however.
Seems like it would just be a lot easier to throw them on the ASA side of the house.
Who in the current DCI mix has 200's that also has the staffing for more? Obviously, 9E doesn't make that list. Unsure about the rest as I don't work for any of em and it would be speculation at best.
The next question is can AWAC staff more 200's easily? Not sure how hiring is going over there.
10-19-2014 | 01:49 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
10-19-2014 | 02:16 PM
#29
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Whats the chances that Delta gets Endeavor down to 81 airplanes (after using Endeavor to dump CRJ200's to comply with the Delta pilots agreement) and then Delta wants to sell the Endeavor 81 CR9 operation to the highest bidder and cash in. Maybe Air Wisconsin and Delta already have an agreement on such a purchase that might also include the 30 options that I'm guessing will be announced as firm orders right around the time that Endeavor receives the last hull from the current order.
What would such transaction mean for the SSP and ETD program?
What would such transaction mean for the SSP and ETD program?
10-19-2014 | 03:43 PM
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 10
From: Sleeping
***NOT TROLLING***
Who in the current DCI mix has 200's that also has the staffing for more? Obviously, 9E doesn't make that list. Unsure about the rest as I don't work for any of em and it would be speculation at best.
The next question is can AWAC staff more 200's easily? Not sure how hiring is going over there.
Who in the current DCI mix has 200's that also has the staffing for more? Obviously, 9E doesn't make that list. Unsure about the rest as I don't work for any of em and it would be speculation at best.
The next question is can AWAC staff more 200's easily? Not sure how hiring is going over there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
