RAH new contract?
01-10-2015 | 05:12 PM
#72
On Reserve
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Buddy, the only reason you guys are all over MIA is cause Envoy held the line as much as they could.... The pilot group was offered 175s in MIA and we said no...the pilot group got tired of all you guys saying "we hot your back" and see how LAX, SJU, MIA close and see DFW & ORD be cannabilezed by bottom feeders...
01-10-2015 | 06:02 PM
#75
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 37
Buddy, the only reason you guys are all over MIA is cause Envoy held the line as much as they could.... The pilot group was offered 175s in MIA and we said no...the pilot group got tired of all you guys saying "we hot your back" and see how LAX, SJU, MIA close and see DFW & ORD be cannabilezed by bottom feeders...
01-10-2015 | 06:04 PM
#76
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Wet behind the ear pis$ ant FO
01-10-2015 | 06:14 PM
#77
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Deadhead pay is 75% of scheduled block. Scheduled being the operative word. We dead head all over creation and back. If it's a company aircraft, we've been getting away with getting 75% of actual block due to some software issues. We regularly DH on other carriers and only get pay based on scheduled block regardless of how long the flight actually takes. I've spent over two hours in the back of a CRJ in the penalty box in ORD completely unpaid because the scheduled block was only 1 hour. So, 45 minutes of pay for 3.5 hours in the back of a CRJ. To add a little salt to the wound, I was removed from my turn out of ORD because of how late we arrived at the gate. No pay protection for that plus a 3+ hour sit before flying off to my reduced rest overnight. This was well before part 117 was even a dream.
01-10-2015 | 07:37 PM
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: ERJ-170 CA
RAH new contract?
Buddy, the only reason you guys are all over MIA is cause Envoy held the line as much as they could.... The pilot group was offered 175s in MIA and we said no...the pilot group got tired of all you guys saying "we hot your back" and see how LAX, SJU, MIA close and see DFW & ORD be cannabilezed by bottom feeders...
Just wanted to add that RAH's CPA was signed with pre-merger, post-bankruptcy AA. I consider us to be separate from the ensuing shakedown between AA and all the post-merger wholly owned carriers.
01-10-2015 | 08:30 PM
#79
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 4
Deadhead pay is 75% of scheduled block. Scheduled being the operative word. We dead head all over creation and back. If it's a company aircraft, we've been getting away with getting 75% of actual block due to some software issues. We regularly DH on other carriers and only get pay based on scheduled block regardless of how long the flight actually takes. I've spent over two hours in the back of a CRJ in the penalty box in ORD completely unpaid because the scheduled block was only 1 hour. So, 45 minutes of pay for 3.5 hours in the back of a CRJ. To add a little salt to the wound, I was removed from my turn out of ORD because of how late we arrived at the gate. No pay protection for that plus a 3+ hour sit before flying off to my reduced rest overnight. This was well before part 117 was even a dream.
01-11-2015 | 06:52 AM
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Piper passenger
Buddy, the only reason you guys are all over MIA is cause Envoy held the line as much as they could.... The pilot group was offered 175s in MIA and we said no...the pilot group got tired of all you guys saying "we hot your back" and see how LAX, SJU, MIA close and see DFW & ORD be cannabilezed by bottom feeders...
You do realize that the 175s you turned down the first time were offered to us again, and BB chose not to bid because he knew we couldn't staff them, he even admitted as much in a corporate comm. last summer. We couldn't staff them because WE voted NO. (Or as Bedford sees it we voted down a pay raise). They were subsequently re offered to you in a lesser TA that YOU voted YES on. Don't blame RAH for MIA, we held the line. Had we voted yes, you likely would have never seen that second vote, and MIA wouldn't have been the only casualty. We are not your enemy! The other wholly owneds, well that's for you to decide if they screwed you over.....
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
