Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is RAH really that bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2015 | 03:06 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 320
Likes: 1
Default

Its tolerable if you already live in base...

but don't believe the recruiters when they say a new contract is just around the corner...the company and union couldn't even agree on whether the company should pay your family if you get taken hostage!

Oh, and we had a crew last month return to the field with an engine fire, then lost the rest of their day to cancellation. They performed admirably on the engine fire, and then lost a days worth of pay. This company refuses to do the right thing time and time again.
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 03:53 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: E175
Default

I think it's because they are just so cheap. I remember when they offered to make improvements, as long as they were "cost neutral". I wish RAH luck, but I don't see BB ever allowing an industry leading pilot contract. He will try to find a different way to attract pilots before he signs a leading CBA. Really a 100 hours for IOE?
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 03:57 PM
  #53  
spaaks's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sqwkvfr
It was, but rumor has it that RAH wanted to park the rest of the 145s according to an earlier schedule since they are so hard up for pilots, but Delta apparently refused to amend their agreement, so the company decided to let this problem get so bad that we're currently in a situation where the 145 schedules are being modified so late in the process that the pilots won't know their February schedules until a day or two before the month begins.

The above is typical of RAH's manner of doing business. They have absolutely no regard for crew members.
Can anyone confirm this? Wouldn't surprise me delta doesn't want to loose feed so rah can staff American and united flying
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 04:00 PM
  #54  
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
Its tolerable if you already live in base...

but don't believe the recruiters when they say a new contract is just around the corner...the company and union couldn't even agree on whether the company should pay your family if you get taken hostage!

Oh, and we had a crew last month return to the field with an engine fire, then lost the rest of their day to cancellation. They performed admirably on the engine fire, and then lost a days worth of pay. This company refuses to do the right thing time and time again.
All correct above
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 04:14 PM
  #55  
billyho's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
Oh, and we had a crew last month return to the field with an engine fire, then lost the rest of their day to cancellation. They performed admirably on the engine fire, and then lost a days worth of pay. This company refuses to do the right thing time and time again.

Sad to know when you are working the hardest you aren't getting paid. What worse is listening to a few friends that flew last winter during some of the storms. Out on a 4 day trip to come back and see you only got paid 7 hours to do a 4 day trip. In this day and age.....Unbelievable!!!
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 04:16 PM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks
Can anyone confirm this? Wouldn't surprise me delta doesn't want to loose feed so rah can staff American and united flying
Well, I can't confirm my own rumor, but I can say that the rumor was that the company was trying to sell a 90-day pulldown for all of the 145 flying and Delta wasn't having it.

...and now Mesa people are being told that their company is bidding on "east coast" 145 flying.

Something is up.
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 05:02 PM
  #57  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

***rumor warning***

A slight tangent, but as far as RAH parking 175s mentioned earlier due to lack of pilots; A little birdy tells me that the regionals are starting to gain leverage through their onslaught of lobbying the FAA. Sorta like Great Lakes did to get lower hour pilots. Now I'm not saying the regionals are all gonna pull out seats and go part 135, but it seems the FAA is softening to the idea of hour reductions in exchange for more sims, more IOE, more check rides and LOFTs...Basically a regional sets up its own low time pilot seasoning syllabus.

Again , I do NOT claim to have personally talked to Bedford or any CEO nor anyone important at the FAA. Just second hand from people a bit lower down the totem pole. I say all this because it wouldn't surprise me after the Lakes saga where the FAA held firm for several months, but eventually the FAA relented and lower time pilots were allowed.
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 05:21 PM
  #58  
VanDriver208's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Full Nelson
Default

I have not heard anything about Mesa bidding on 145 flying out east...but it wouldn't surprise me. We seem to be willing to pick up anyone's scraps that we can.
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 06:04 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: E175
Default

I've hear that Republic did cancel the last 145 bid. Sounds like they may be getting ready for a drawdown of the 145s, but who knows. I'm sure BB wants all Ejets, plus he can used the 145 pilots to staff the Ejets. If he does park the 145s this summer, upgrades will easily reach eight years from the displacements. Not sure who would pick up the 145 flying though.
Reply
Old 01-20-2015 | 06:20 PM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VanDriver208
I have not heard anything about Mesa bidding on 145 flying out east...but it wouldn't surprise me. We seem to be willing to pick up anyone's scraps that we can.
I'd seriously be surprised if Mesa wasn't bidding for that. I just hope any new flying we get, comes in small chunks, 7 airplanes here, 6 there, and so on... Don't want 60 new airplanes over 2 years! no no no no no no no no no
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TillerEnvy
Major
112
09-14-2014 07:31 AM
Slick111
Regional
1
05-16-2014 03:25 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
Chupacabras
Regional
43
03-11-2014 02:07 PM
skypine27
Cargo
2
08-07-2007 03:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices