NWA MEC Reaction to XJ CRJ900's
#11
you are very short sighted....have fun flying an RJ at commuter pay for the rest of your career. You guys JUST DON"T GET IT and I'm not so sure how much longer I should bless you with my presence on this sight(i.e. voice of reason). Maybe I too will go the way of the dodo bird(and calcapt)
#12
Nothing against the XJers, but I really hope that this flying goes to NWA. If the mainline guys will pick up flying the 900s, maybe they can start to re-claim (or claim for the first time) the RJ flying. This would be good for all who desire to fly for a major someday.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
I'm not saying I support more and more CRJ900/E190s at the regional level, but you need to look at who you are placing the blame to.
The RJs should never have made it to a regional to begin with. They should have stayed at the mainline level. But guess who farmed them out, in order to protect their widebody pay and other issues?
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: SAABster
Posts: 639
you are very short sighted....have fun flying an RJ at commuter pay for the rest of your career. You guys JUST DON"T GET IT and I'm not so sure how much longer I should bless you with my presence on this sight(i.e. voice of reason). Maybe I too will go the way of the dodo bird(and calcapt)
Please!!! The seniority list at NWA is top heavy. Management will not allow NWA Jurasic NINE pilots to fly the 900's. Won't happen. Not for that pay rate. Economics is driving this biz...period. Within the next ten years over half of NWA's pilot will be retired. Then the fight for better pay scale and scope will be winable, not now. P.S. If I fly an RJ the rest of my life that's up to me. Alot of you guys/girls complain at every step of your career. Can't wait to be a Flight Instructor, Flight Instructing sucks, can't wait to fly commuters. Commuters suck, can't wait to fly mainline. If we quit others will fly for lower rates. Remember, someone will fly these planes.
#15
you are very short sighted....have fun flying an RJ at commuter pay for the rest of your career. You guys JUST DON"T GET IT and I'm not so sure how much longer I should bless you with my presence on this sight(i.e. voice of reason). Maybe I too will go the way of the dodo bird(and calcapt)
#16
[QUOTE=saab2000;109461]Good Luck???? WTF???
Luck has nothing to do with this. The deck has been stacked in favor of the so called "Management" there for a long time.[/QUOTE
I just hope mesaba doesnt get beaten down any more. They need the 900's and I hope they get em. As much as its not a question of luck, I hope it works out good for XJ.
Luck has nothing to do with this. The deck has been stacked in favor of the so called "Management" there for a long time.[/QUOTE
I just hope mesaba doesnt get beaten down any more. They need the 900's and I hope they get em. As much as its not a question of luck, I hope it works out good for XJ.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Lots and Lots of Days Off
Posts: 586
Here is the language from the NWA TA that talks about 76 seat jets at a wholly-owned subsidiary:
4. SJ’s configured with 51-76 seats which are flown at a separate wholly owned subsidiary/affiliate of NWA (called “SJet” for now”).
• No limitations on use.
• Must have a certificated seating capacity of 86 seats or less, with the exception that if the CRJ-900LR is operated the maximum seating certification level is 90 seats.
• Limited to 90 total aircraft, which is inclusive of the 55 aircraft limit for the Feeder Carrier flying.
• The 90 aircraft limit may be exceeded on a 1:1 basis with the “entering into service” of a 77-110 seat configured SJ to be flown at NWA mainline.
• Furloughed NWA pilots have the first right to the jobs at “SJet”, but will be on a separate seniority list.
• There would be a “flow up / flow down” between pilots at “SJet” and NWA, including new hire pilots at SJet and NWA. The flow up / down would be subject to metering limitations.
• NWA would be allowed to sell “SJet” after 10 77-110 seat configured Small Jets “are in active service” at NWA mainline.
• If the successor owner of “SJet” does not comply with the Flow Up / Down provisions, the number of 51-76 seat SJs being flown by Feeder Carriers would be required to be reduced to a baseline of 55 aircraft.
• The pay rates and work rules for the “SJet” flying are covered later.
• Note: the trigger for NWA to outsource up to 90 76 seat configured aircraft is dependent upon maintaining the flow up/down process.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Lots and Lots of Days Off
Posts: 586
Something for the lawyers to work out. It doesn't really impact any NWA furloughees since there are 72 aircraft that need to be crewed (36 at Mesaba and 36 at Compass). Obviously there are jobs for everyone, it is just a matter of seniority lists.
#19
RJ85FO: Thanks for the posting. Here is an interesting spin.
"When ownership is not shared, so that a subsidiary is wholly owned, it is called a branch. A subsidiary is different from a branch in that the former is jointly owned by the parent company and others while the latter is completely owned by the parent company."
Mesaba and Compass may each be a "branch" of NWA. The contract language states that: "Furloughed NWA pilots have the first right to the jobs at “SJet”, but will be on a separate seniority list." Does this mean at both Mesaba and Compass ?
Continuing the contract states: There would be a “flow up / flow down” between pilots at “SJet” and NWA, including new hire pilots at SJet and NWA.Is there going to be a flow up / down at both Mesaba and Compass ?
Finally the contract states: • Note: the trigger for NWA to outsource up to 90 76 seat configured aircraft is dependent upon maintaining the flow up/down process
Lots of interesting questions. The lawyers are going to make a lot of money before this is over.
"When ownership is not shared, so that a subsidiary is wholly owned, it is called a branch. A subsidiary is different from a branch in that the former is jointly owned by the parent company and others while the latter is completely owned by the parent company."
Mesaba and Compass may each be a "branch" of NWA. The contract language states that: "Furloughed NWA pilots have the first right to the jobs at “SJet”, but will be on a separate seniority list." Does this mean at both Mesaba and Compass ?
Continuing the contract states: There would be a “flow up / flow down” between pilots at “SJet” and NWA, including new hire pilots at SJet and NWA.Is there going to be a flow up / down at both Mesaba and Compass ?
Finally the contract states: • Note: the trigger for NWA to outsource up to 90 76 seat configured aircraft is dependent upon maintaining the flow up/down process
Lots of interesting questions. The lawyers are going to make a lot of money before this is over.
Last edited by Ftrooppilot; 01-29-2007 at 04:33 PM. Reason: Added contract statement.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post