Ric still projects 2.5/6
#71
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
They (the company) can't. Those who suggest otherwise are just talking out of their asses. One can have confidence in the flow for two reasons. 1) Whatever critical staffing situation that, as inferred, would motivate violation that contractual provision, would immediately cause the staffing situation to worsen. There are many other incentive actions that can be taken prior to that point that would be more effective and cost less without having such a negative effect on recruitment and retention. 2) ALPA has won every grievance concerning the Letter 3/Flow creating a significant past precedence on the subject. In other words, the restriction of flow would have a minor and short lived significance on envoy staffing.
Claims to that effect have no legal or logical (business) sense to support it. They are simply saying what they hope will happen without any logical argument to support it.
Claims to that effect have no legal or logical (business) sense to support it. They are simply saying what they hope will happen without any logical argument to support it.
Welcome to the logical argument bankruptcy club in trying to support your arguments.
#72
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Actually no you are wrong. Define to me what the 824 are exactly then define what the cba agreement regarding flow is. You can sit here and blow smoke up anyone's *** you want to show that the flow cannot be tinkered and slowed to a trickle by aag, you need the new hires to come to envoy more than I do.
Alpa had dragged its feet on the violation on letter 3 for years and then settle for less and sold rights away of the letter 3 pilots and they will again when the 824 are gone. AAG timeline that I mentioned was a best case scenario for a grievance solution if required.
Stay in your own world that aag has or will never violate any or all contracts at some point in time if it deems it to its best interest.
Those who spout the flow will work as spelled out fail to understand who controls the flow, it ain't you or me.
Flow is cheap labor for 6 years at best for a new hire if they get to flow, will work for less.
Alpa had dragged its feet on the violation on letter 3 for years and then settle for less and sold rights away of the letter 3 pilots and they will again when the 824 are gone. AAG timeline that I mentioned was a best case scenario for a grievance solution if required.
Stay in your own world that aag has or will never violate any or all contracts at some point in time if it deems it to its best interest.
Those who spout the flow will work as spelled out fail to understand who controls the flow, it ain't you or me.
Flow is cheap labor for 6 years at best for a new hire if they get to flow, will work for less.
My argument throughout this entire thread has been against those who are convinced that the 824 will work (because it is) but anything after that will be bottlenecked. At no point in time has anybody given any sort of logical reason why this would happen. The only way I can see it not happening is if AA does not hire, in which case the flow agreements aren't even being violated.
On one hand we have you saying they won't be honored likely because you got screwed by AMR (note, not AAG) and ALPA. On the other hand we have eaglefly saying it won't be honored because he thinks AAG is going to want all WO's to have the same type of flow agreement. Then of course there are the others on here who say it won't be honored because they're grasping at straws to keep people away from envoy. Yet at no time has anybody brought forth a logical argument as to why it won't be honored except their own selfish and misguided opinions!
Well, I'm done for now. I thought this forum might have some decent info on it but it appears to be full of idiots who never have worked here or don't work here anymore but still hold a grudge. Great job.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Actually my dog in this discussion is limited to not blow smoke.
I never stated they are named pilots in the 824, I just referred to 824 pilots.
Whether aag honors the protected pilot agreement is up to aag not me, I just don't want anyone to bet the house and their career on this particular portion of the CBA, that's all.
People want to see unicorns, that is there choice. I will not sell anything in envoy contract as guaranteed in stone, not even my job is completely guaranteed. The flow is a gimmick used to attract pilots at the w/o regionals without having to increase pay and benefits, but other regionals are doing exactly this because they have no flow except commute air.
That's all I have pointed out, that the flow is nothing but a recruitment tool used by aag and can be implemented anyway aag wants to after the 824 arbitration is complete.
I do not work for hashimoto to recruit for the w/o's, nor will I ever.
I never stated they are named pilots in the 824, I just referred to 824 pilots.
Whether aag honors the protected pilot agreement is up to aag not me, I just don't want anyone to bet the house and their career on this particular portion of the CBA, that's all.
People want to see unicorns, that is there choice. I will not sell anything in envoy contract as guaranteed in stone, not even my job is completely guaranteed. The flow is a gimmick used to attract pilots at the w/o regionals without having to increase pay and benefits, but other regionals are doing exactly this because they have no flow except commute air.
That's all I have pointed out, that the flow is nothing but a recruitment tool used by aag and can be implemented anyway aag wants to after the 824 arbitration is complete.
I do not work for hashimoto to recruit for the w/o's, nor will I ever.
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
No never Said anything like that. Feel free to present that position as your own, not mine. Sell what ever you need to prospective pilots. All I will say on this and it will be my final point on this, nothing is a guarantee.
But people should understand that without new hires at the w/o regionals the flow WILL stop after the 824 and those already there need new hires to come so those already there may improve their chance to flow.
How many management personnel are on the forums pushing flow in lieu of substantial pay and benefits for the pilots.
But people should understand that without new hires at the w/o regionals the flow WILL stop after the 824 and those already there need new hires to come so those already there may improve their chance to flow.
How many management personnel are on the forums pushing flow in lieu of substantial pay and benefits for the pilots.
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
No never Said anything like that. Feel free to present that position as your own, not mine. Sell what ever you need to prospective pilots. All I will say on this and it will be my final point on this, nothing is a guarantee.
But people should understand that without new hires at the w/o regionals the flow WILL stop after the 824 and those already there need new hires to come so those already there may improve their chance to flow.
How many management personnel are on the forums pushing flow in lieu of substantial pay and benefits for the pilots.
But people should understand that without new hires at the w/o regionals the flow WILL stop after the 824 and those already there need new hires to come so those already there may improve their chance to flow.
How many management personnel are on the forums pushing flow in lieu of substantial pay and benefits for the pilots.
If increasing aircraft count is what happens, those new hires are going to be needed sooner or later for this flow to keep going. I've asked before and will ask again now. Do you really think AAG will let aircraft sit idle in order to "honor the flow?" If you do, I'd like some of what it is you are drinking.
I agree also that this flow is being used by management as a recruiting tool.
#79
This is that ass talk I was talking about. The flow can't be stopped. It falls under the same contractual assurance that says you get a min guarantee for the month, and your pay rate. You might as well go around saying, don't work here, there is no guarantee your paycheck will cash. Stopping the flow would make staffing worse, not better and would be overturned through arbitration. Saying, "Anything Can Happen", or "There's No Guarantee" rates right up there with that TV evangelizer saying, "You don't have to understand, You just have to have faith." Stating broad ranging vague philosophical statements is not a valid argument that AAG would violate the contract in a way that would exacerbate the problem that such an action is suppose to address.
#80
EMB145's Logic : We can't recruit enough to staff. We take the biggest recruitment & retention incentive away. Recruitment and Staffing is now better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



