Ric still projects 2.5/6
#61
Because the 824 are the highest earners and also it was a judge's arbitration. To assume Envoy wouldn't hold back a <12 guy is naive. His cost would be in check industry wide for regional flying.
Do you really think envoy will never need it's captains to run the operation. Even despite the shrinking, the slack will catch up and Envoy will need every pilot they have and will make every attempt to bottle neck the flow.
If you claim that the company is right sized then Envoy will have to hire 1:1 for flow plus the flying it's bringing back, which won't be easy in this environment. PSA pulled it off last year due to laterals that I doubt Envoy will be able to attract.
Do you really think envoy will never need it's captains to run the operation. Even despite the shrinking, the slack will catch up and Envoy will need every pilot they have and will make every attempt to bottle neck the flow.
If you claim that the company is right sized then Envoy will have to hire 1:1 for flow plus the flying it's bringing back, which won't be easy in this environment. PSA pulled it off last year due to laterals that I doubt Envoy will be able to attract.
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Because the 824 are the highest earners and also it was a judge's arbitration. To assume Envoy wouldn't hold back a <12 guy is naive. His cost would be in check industry wide for regional flying.
Do you really think envoy will never need it's captains to run the operation. Even despite the shrinking, the slack will catch up and Envoy will need every pilot they have and will make every attempt to bottle neck the flow.
If you claim that the company is right sized then Envoy will have to hire 1:1 for flow plus the flying it's bringing back, which won't be easy in this environment. PSA pulled it off last year due to laterals that I doubt Envoy will be able to attract.
Do you really think envoy will never need it's captains to run the operation. Even despite the shrinking, the slack will catch up and Envoy will need every pilot they have and will make every attempt to bottle neck the flow.
If you claim that the company is right sized then Envoy will have to hire 1:1 for flow plus the flying it's bringing back, which won't be easy in this environment. PSA pulled it off last year due to laterals that I doubt Envoy will be able to attract.
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
If you need to have it explained to you, then you are new to airlines or just playing it that way. But I will bite, judge ruled in arbitration when you hire at AA these 824 will be in those classes. Any flow after that is via an agreement by aag and the union at the regional w/o. Any contract and all contracts have been violated by airline management, selectively.
In other words, it's a lottery, you may win or you may loose. It is controlled and interpreted by aag, does not matter what you understand it to mean. AAG answer will be grieve it and that will take two years at best with AAG foot dragging with the final result being a compromise by aag and Alpa which will result in another watered down flow and no retro protection to those whom aag harmed.
You get it now. Just like our jobs, today we have one tomorrow we don't.
In other words, it's a lottery, you may win or you may loose. It is controlled and interpreted by aag, does not matter what you understand it to mean. AAG answer will be grieve it and that will take two years at best with AAG foot dragging with the final result being a compromise by aag and Alpa which will result in another watered down flow and no retro protection to those whom aag harmed.
You get it now. Just like our jobs, today we have one tomorrow we don't.
#64
Haha, I love it when people say "because it was a judges arbitration." So I guess you're claiming that any flow after that is essentially worthless and can be "bottle necked" at any time because it's not a judges arbitration? Please elaborate. I might need to re-think some career plans thanks to your wisdom.
Claims to that effect have no legal or logical (business) sense to support it. They are simply saying what they hope will happen without any logical argument to support it.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Oh I'm well aware of this, as is anyone with half a brain. I just would really love to see what basis for an argument those that would love to see envoy fail have to support there claim. The argument "it's not a judges arbitration so it can and will likely be violated" is obviously someone grasping at straws who really does have a bone to pick with the envoy pilot group, for whatever reason that may be.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
If you need to have it explained to you, then you are new to airlines or just playing it that way. But I will bite, judge ruled in arbitration when you hire at AA these 824 will be in those classes. Any flow after that is via an agreement by aag and the union at the regional w/o. Any contract and all contracts have been violated by airline management, selectively.
In other words, it's a lottery, you may win or you may loose. It is controlled and interpreted by aag, does not matter what you understand it to mean. AAG answer will be grieve it and that will take two years at best with AAG foot dragging with the final result being a compromise by aag and Alpa which will result in another watered down flow and no retro protection to those whom aag harmed.
You get it now. Just like our jobs, today we have one tomorrow we don't.
In other words, it's a lottery, you may win or you may loose. It is controlled and interpreted by aag, does not matter what you understand it to mean. AAG answer will be grieve it and that will take two years at best with AAG foot dragging with the final result being a compromise by aag and Alpa which will result in another watered down flow and no retro protection to those whom aag harmed.
You get it now. Just like our jobs, today we have one tomorrow we don't.
On the bright side, I appreciate you showing off how clueless you really are so I know that from here on out I don't have to waste any time with you. Thanks!
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Actually no you are wrong. Define to me what the 824 are exactly then define what the cba agreement regarding flow is. You can sit here and blow smoke up anyone's *** you want to show that the flow cannot be tinkered and slowed to a trickle by aag, you need the new hires to come to envoy more than I do.
Alpa had dragged its feet on the violation on letter 3 for years and then settle for less and sold rights away of the letter 3 pilots and they will again when the 824 are gone. AAG timeline that I mentioned was a best case scenario for a grievance solution if required.
Stay in your own world that aag has or will never violate any or all contracts at some point in time if it deems it to its best interest.
Those who spout the flow will work as spelled out fail to understand who controls the flow, it ain't you or me.
Flow is cheap labor for 6 years at best for a new hire if they get to flow, will work for less.
Alpa had dragged its feet on the violation on letter 3 for years and then settle for less and sold rights away of the letter 3 pilots and they will again when the 824 are gone. AAG timeline that I mentioned was a best case scenario for a grievance solution if required.
Stay in your own world that aag has or will never violate any or all contracts at some point in time if it deems it to its best interest.
Those who spout the flow will work as spelled out fail to understand who controls the flow, it ain't you or me.
Flow is cheap labor for 6 years at best for a new hire if they get to flow, will work for less.
#68
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Did you ever stop and think for a single moment why you get singled out? You really are being singled out on many occasions, that's for real... More so than anybody I've seen here. Seriously, did you? I can say it's not because of your intelligent posts or witty banter, your succinctness or your ability to make a convincing argument. There's a real reason behind it. If you're blind to it, you've got some psychological issues. If you're not, and continue to act the way you do because you enjoy being a jack wagon...well, that answers a lot of questions.
When everyone around you stinks like crap all the time, it's probably not them and it's time to check the bottom of your own shoe.
When everyone around you stinks like crap all the time, it's probably not them and it's time to check the bottom of your own shoe.

If all you hear from me is a bunch of "blahs", it makes you look kinda ridiculous expending so much energy responding. You need a vacation. I recommend somewhere tropical.
#69
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
I'm curious as to why you arbitrarily pick the 824 as the point in time when AAG reneges on their flow agreement with envoy, specifically the Protected Pilot and the contractual flow after that? The only reason I can see you saying that is that you see the 824 agreement working as advertised, so have to pick on the agreements that are next in line in order to look like you have some legitimacy.
What you also fail to mention is that the flow agreements with PDT and envoy are essentially the same once you hit a certain threshold. That threshold being anybody hired here post DOS. Until then, envoy's flow is far and away better (in terms of amount being sent to AA vs. total size of the pilot group) then any other WO. Again, yes for those hired post DOS, the envoy and PDT flow provisions are relatively balanced out. Hence why the flow projection is the same general time period at both PDT and envoy. But you seem to be under the constant belief that AAG is going to renege on the provisions of the flow post-824, in order to "balance it out" with the other two WO's, yet provide no legitimate evidence or argument to back that prediction up.
Edit; Unless you've been out of the loop, envoy is "right sized" or at least very close to it. This does not include any of the anticipated (not yet announced) return of the TSA birds which would correlate to growth. So by your prediction, shouldn't the other two WO's be getting a nice little christmas gift from Dougie in the form of a better flow? Or do they have to wait for the end of the 824 to get a better flow?
What you also fail to mention is that the flow agreements with PDT and envoy are essentially the same once you hit a certain threshold. That threshold being anybody hired here post DOS. Until then, envoy's flow is far and away better (in terms of amount being sent to AA vs. total size of the pilot group) then any other WO. Again, yes for those hired post DOS, the envoy and PDT flow provisions are relatively balanced out. Hence why the flow projection is the same general time period at both PDT and envoy. But you seem to be under the constant belief that AAG is going to renege on the provisions of the flow post-824, in order to "balance it out" with the other two WO's, yet provide no legitimate evidence or argument to back that prediction up.
Edit; Unless you've been out of the loop, envoy is "right sized" or at least very close to it. This does not include any of the anticipated (not yet announced) return of the TSA birds which would correlate to growth. So by your prediction, shouldn't the other two WO's be getting a nice little christmas gift from Dougie in the form of a better flow? Or do they have to wait for the end of the 824 to get a better flow?
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Feito no Brasil, CA
Copy/paste. About 4-5 clicks and I generate just as much useful content as yourself. Virtually effortless.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



