Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Ric still projects 2.5/6 >

Ric still projects 2.5/6

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Ric still projects 2.5/6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2015 | 04:39 PM
  #61  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Because the 824 are the highest earners and also it was a judge's arbitration. To assume Envoy wouldn't hold back a <12 guy is naive. His cost would be in check industry wide for regional flying.
Do you really think envoy will never need it's captains to run the operation. Even despite the shrinking, the slack will catch up and Envoy will need every pilot they have and will make every attempt to bottle neck the flow.
If you claim that the company is right sized then Envoy will have to hire 1:1 for flow plus the flying it's bringing back, which won't be easy in this environment. PSA pulled it off last year due to laterals that I doubt Envoy will be able to attract.
I agree, that's why they are focusing more on the pipeline than getting pilots from other regionals.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 04:59 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Because the 824 are the highest earners and also it was a judge's arbitration. To assume Envoy wouldn't hold back a <12 guy is naive. His cost would be in check industry wide for regional flying.
Do you really think envoy will never need it's captains to run the operation. Even despite the shrinking, the slack will catch up and Envoy will need every pilot they have and will make every attempt to bottle neck the flow.
If you claim that the company is right sized then Envoy will have to hire 1:1 for flow plus the flying it's bringing back, which won't be easy in this environment. PSA pulled it off last year due to laterals that I doubt Envoy will be able to attract.
Haha, I love it when people say "because it was a judges arbitration." So I guess you're claiming that any flow after that is essentially worthless and can be "bottle necked" at any time because it's not a judges arbitration? Please elaborate. I might need to re-think some career plans thanks to your wisdom.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 05:17 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

If you need to have it explained to you, then you are new to airlines or just playing it that way. But I will bite, judge ruled in arbitration when you hire at AA these 824 will be in those classes. Any flow after that is via an agreement by aag and the union at the regional w/o. Any contract and all contracts have been violated by airline management, selectively.

In other words, it's a lottery, you may win or you may loose. It is controlled and interpreted by aag, does not matter what you understand it to mean. AAG answer will be grieve it and that will take two years at best with AAG foot dragging with the final result being a compromise by aag and Alpa which will result in another watered down flow and no retro protection to those whom aag harmed.

You get it now. Just like our jobs, today we have one tomorrow we don't.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 05:21 PM
  #64  
FlameNSky's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84
Haha, I love it when people say "because it was a judges arbitration." So I guess you're claiming that any flow after that is essentially worthless and can be "bottle necked" at any time because it's not a judges arbitration? Please elaborate. I might need to re-think some career plans thanks to your wisdom.
They (the company) can't. Those who suggest otherwise are just talking out of their asses. One can have confidence in the flow for two reasons. 1) Whatever critical staffing situation that, as inferred, would motivate violation that contractual provision, would immediately cause the staffing situation to worsen. There are many other incentive actions that can be taken prior to that point that would be more effective and cost less without having such a negative effect on recruitment and retention. 2) ALPA has won every grievance concerning the Letter 3/Flow creating a significant past precedence on the subject. In other words, the restriction of flow would have a minor and short lived significance on envoy staffing.

Claims to that effect have no legal or logical (business) sense to support it. They are simply saying what they hope will happen without any logical argument to support it.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 05:35 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlameNSky
Claims to that effect have no legal or logical (business) sense to support it. They are simply saying what they hope will happen without any logical argument to support it.
Oh I'm well aware of this, as is anyone with half a brain. I just would really love to see what basis for an argument those that would love to see envoy fail have to support there claim. The argument "it's not a judges arbitration so it can and will likely be violated" is obviously someone grasping at straws who really does have a bone to pick with the envoy pilot group, for whatever reason that may be.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 05:46 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8
If you need to have it explained to you, then you are new to airlines or just playing it that way. But I will bite, judge ruled in arbitration when you hire at AA these 824 will be in those classes. Any flow after that is via an agreement by aag and the union at the regional w/o. Any contract and all contracts have been violated by airline management, selectively.

In other words, it's a lottery, you may win or you may loose. It is controlled and interpreted by aag, does not matter what you understand it to mean. AAG answer will be grieve it and that will take two years at best with AAG foot dragging with the final result being a compromise by aag and Alpa which will result in another watered down flow and no retro protection to those whom aag harmed.

You get it now. Just like our jobs, today we have one tomorrow we don't.
While I may be new to this forum I'm not new to envoy. I am also very well versed in all of our flow agreements. The description you gave of the 824 was by far the worst I have ever heard, so you lost all credibility right there. Anything you said after that is nothing more then the wishful thinking on your part (christ, you even gave a timeline for how long AAG foot dragging will last!).

On the bright side, I appreciate you showing off how clueless you really are so I know that from here on out I don't have to waste any time with you. Thanks!
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 05:57 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Actually no you are wrong. Define to me what the 824 are exactly then define what the cba agreement regarding flow is. You can sit here and blow smoke up anyone's *** you want to show that the flow cannot be tinkered and slowed to a trickle by aag, you need the new hires to come to envoy more than I do.

Alpa had dragged its feet on the violation on letter 3 for years and then settle for less and sold rights away of the letter 3 pilots and they will again when the 824 are gone. AAG timeline that I mentioned was a best case scenario for a grievance solution if required.

Stay in your own world that aag has or will never violate any or all contracts at some point in time if it deems it to its best interest.

Those who spout the flow will work as spelled out fail to understand who controls the flow, it ain't you or me.

Flow is cheap labor for 6 years at best for a new hire if they get to flow, will work for less.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 06:08 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
Did you ever stop and think for a single moment why you get singled out? You really are being singled out on many occasions, that's for real... More so than anybody I've seen here. Seriously, did you? I can say it's not because of your intelligent posts or witty banter, your succinctness or your ability to make a convincing argument. There's a real reason behind it. If you're blind to it, you've got some psychological issues. If you're not, and continue to act the way you do because you enjoy being a jack wagon...well, that answers a lot of questions.

When everyone around you stinks like crap all the time, it's probably not them and it's time to check the bottom of your own shoe.
My, my.........such anger and rage.

If all you hear from me is a bunch of "blahs", it makes you look kinda ridiculous expending so much energy responding. You need a vacation. I recommend somewhere tropical.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 06:11 PM
  #69  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84
I'm curious as to why you arbitrarily pick the 824 as the point in time when AAG reneges on their flow agreement with envoy, specifically the Protected Pilot and the contractual flow after that? The only reason I can see you saying that is that you see the 824 agreement working as advertised, so have to pick on the agreements that are next in line in order to look like you have some legitimacy.

What you also fail to mention is that the flow agreements with PDT and envoy are essentially the same once you hit a certain threshold. That threshold being anybody hired here post DOS. Until then, envoy's flow is far and away better (in terms of amount being sent to AA vs. total size of the pilot group) then any other WO. Again, yes for those hired post DOS, the envoy and PDT flow provisions are relatively balanced out. Hence why the flow projection is the same general time period at both PDT and envoy. But you seem to be under the constant belief that AAG is going to renege on the provisions of the flow post-824, in order to "balance it out" with the other two WO's, yet provide no legitimate evidence or argument to back that prediction up.


Edit; Unless you've been out of the loop, envoy is "right sized" or at least very close to it. This does not include any of the anticipated (not yet announced) return of the TSA birds which would correlate to growth. So by your prediction, shouldn't the other two WO's be getting a nice little christmas gift from Dougie in the form of a better flow? Or do they have to wait for the end of the 824 to get a better flow?
Others essentially answered your question for me.
Reply
Old 12-15-2015 | 06:23 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Feito no Brasil, CA
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
My, my.........such anger and rage.

If all you hear from me is a bunch of "blahs", it makes you look kinda ridiculous expending so much energy responding. You need a vacation. I recommend somewhere tropical.
Copy/paste. About 4-5 clicks and I generate just as much useful content as yourself. Virtually effortless.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roadrunner65
Major
11
10-31-2014 12:50 PM
VAviator
Flight Schools and Training
2
08-28-2010 06:01 PM
msh168
Hangar Talk
1
06-29-2008 01:55 PM
C172MQI
Trans States Airlines
9
12-28-2007 07:53 PM
AV8ER
Regional
0
12-27-2006 01:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices