What the C-Series order means?
#52
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Lots
Posts: 175
Define "regional" feed? This is a all a shell game of shuffling capacity, maximizing ASM's, and streamlining schedules. This is the one thing Delta is really good at, and they will continue to do so. This whole wet dream that somehow these airframes are going to kill the regional model is laughable. Just ask Mr Zimmerman.
#53
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
More around 50-60%. Most of the big 3 will be in that range. 80-90% in the next 15+ years.
#55
Define "regional" feed? This is a all a shell game of shuffling capacity, maximizing ASM's, and streamlining schedules. This is the one thing Delta is really good at, and they will continue to do so. This whole wet dream that somehow these airframes are going to kill the regional model is laughable.
#56
In 5 to 10 years, none of us will be able to recognize the indusrty, going to get interesting! If Mesa can always provide a quick upgrade, and short times on reserve, that may keep them going along side the WO's, otherwise the WO's with bottomless pocket books from big brother will be the only survivors eventually.
#57
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Lots
Posts: 175
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Furthermore, WO's operate in the same market as non-WO carriers. The only thing a WO offers the mainline carrier is the ability to whipsaw other regionals or tightly control their regional product. Tell me a case where being on an end of a whipsaw or tighter control of a product benefits the pilot.
#59
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,563
Why won't WO lift decrease? The WO airlines tend to be the more expensive regional. As long as other regionals can staff there is really no need for a wholly owned. Especially since mainline carriers tend to own the planes the non-WOs operate.
Furthermore, WO's operate in the same market as non-WO carriers. The only thing a WO offers the mainline carrier is the ability to whipsaw other regionals or tightly control their regional product. Tell me a case where being on an end of a whipsaw or tighter control of a product benefits the pilot.
Furthermore, WO's operate in the same market as non-WO carriers. The only thing a WO offers the mainline carrier is the ability to whipsaw other regionals or tightly control their regional product. Tell me a case where being on an end of a whipsaw or tighter control of a product benefits the pilot.
#60
Why won't WO lift decrease? The WO airlines tend to be the more expensive regional. As long as other regionals can staff there is really no need for a wholly owned. Especially since mainline carriers tend to own the planes the non-WOs operate.
Furthermore, WO's operate in the same market as non-WO carriers. The only thing a WO offers the mainline carrier is the ability to whipsaw other regionals or tightly control their regional product. Tell me a case where being on an end of a whipsaw or tighter control of a product benefits the pilot.
Furthermore, WO's operate in the same market as non-WO carriers. The only thing a WO offers the mainline carrier is the ability to whipsaw other regionals or tightly control their regional product. Tell me a case where being on an end of a whipsaw or tighter control of a product benefits the pilot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post