The MRJ90 and E175-E2 are done
12-08-2016 | 08:32 AM
#171
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
So the machines are taking over, etc. Whatever. That tech has been around for generations and practically viable for decades. But no where near realistic on a cost basis. Humans are simply way cheaper. Especially for flying. Worst case we'll see a reduction on long haul crews. Although it would be pretty funny to see them sign off on a 2 pilot ultra long haul knowing that if something happens the pilot in deep REM sleep will have to spring to life and come help save the day bwahahahah!
Not worried about it in the slightest.
12-08-2016 | 08:35 AM
#172
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Turn times have nothing to do with pilots. If anything, we'll see more and more back side of the clock flying and perhaps more stringent regulations on sleep etc. Sucks for the hero who bid back side stuff so they can run businesses and paint their houses during the day but oh well.
12-08-2016 | 08:37 AM
#173
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Now, if your broader point is to always be vigilant and not take things for granted, then of course I agree.
12-08-2016 | 08:37 AM
#174
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,533
Likes: 1,129
I disagree completely. I know just as many millennials who are uncomfortable with self-driving cars as I do baby-boomers. It is going to take quite a bit of testing and certification to get the first fully pilotless aircraft. I estimate it to be in the next 40-50 years. Airlines aren't going to park brand new 787s in 15 years and completely repurchase an incredibly more expensive airplane just because it would save them a few dollars per ticket.
12-08-2016 | 08:44 AM
#175
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,533
Likes: 1,129
How does that effect utilization in the slightest?
Turn times have nothing to do with pilots. If anything, we'll see more and more back side of the clock flying and perhaps more stringent regulations on sleep etc. Sucks for the hero who bid back side stuff so they can run businesses and paint their houses during the day but oh well.
Turn times have nothing to do with pilots. If anything, we'll see more and more back side of the clock flying and perhaps more stringent regulations on sleep etc. Sucks for the hero who bid back side stuff so they can run businesses and paint their houses during the day but oh well.
Plus, many mainline aircraft already fly 24/7. The reason they don't isn't because of the pilots. It's because they can't sell enough tickets to fill up an airplane.
12-08-2016 | 08:58 AM
#176
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
I disagree completely. I know just as many millennials who are uncomfortable with self-driving cars as I do baby-boomers. It is going to take quite a bit of testing and certification to get the first fully pilotless aircraft. I estimate it to be in the next 40-50 years. Airlines aren't going to park brand new 787s in 15 years and completely repurchase an incredibly more expensive airplane just because it would save them a few dollars per ticket.
. An entry level pilot will incur a 24-month category freeze. 24 Exception two: A pilot who is in the last 12 months of such category freeze may be 25 awarded an AE or VD to another base for which qualification training is required if he is 26 unable to be awarded an AE or VD to such base in his current position in a given posting. 27 In such event, the balance of his existing category freeze will be added to the category 28 freeze resultin
12-08-2016 | 09:05 AM
#177
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
My entire point is that the 76 seat limit (along with current weights) is far more likely to hold than to be relieved. You pointed to the metro-CR9 trend as "historical" proof that regionals will continue to be granted ever increasing sized RJ's.
I've said its possible that there could be additional 76's granted for a larger corresponding reduction in seats and block hours in the 50-70 range. But even that was smacked down recently. Could it happen in the future? Maybe. But even that is a far cry from 77+ sized ones, and would require the regional sector to shrink even more, even if it did happen.
12-08-2016 | 10:42 AM
#178
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
No, not at all, these systems would be added on to current aircraft.
12-08-2016 | 10:47 AM
#179
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
LOL! Yeah ok.
So the machines are taking over, etc. Whatever. That tech has been around for generations and practically viable for decades. But no where near realistic on a cost basis. Humans are simply way cheaper. Especially for flying. Worst case we'll see a reduction on long haul crews. Although it would be pretty funny to see them sign off on a 2 pilot ultra long haul knowing that if something happens the pilot in deep REM sleep will have to spring to life and come help save the day bwahahahah!
Not worried about it in the slightest.
So the machines are taking over, etc. Whatever. That tech has been around for generations and practically viable for decades. But no where near realistic on a cost basis. Humans are simply way cheaper. Especially for flying. Worst case we'll see a reduction on long haul crews. Although it would be pretty funny to see them sign off on a 2 pilot ultra long haul knowing that if something happens the pilot in deep REM sleep will have to spring to life and come help save the day bwahahahah!
Not worried about it in the slightest.
The entire machine learning team at Boeing thinks this can be done within 5 years. Elon Musk thinks it's sooner.
