Search
Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

Republic after the contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:35 AM
  #401  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by tvlawyer View Post
Such posts are perpetuated by the same ignoramuses who say Endeavor is nothing more than Pinnacle-Colgan-Mesaba in a different color dress, or that Silver is just Gulfstream in disguise. The airline industry is very fluid. I've worked in it since the 80's. I don't remember a time when it was not turbulent. The players come and go. AAG was once the darling of the industry. United was a gem. Just look at both of them now struggling to stay alive. The industry laughed at PeoplExpress. Meanwhile, all the airlines are now making billions on a similar business model.

My point is, when an airline has a significant management change, signs a new labor contract, or restructures its finances, it is not necessarily the "same" airline.
What are you talking about?
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 01:22 PM
  #402  
Currently Furloughed
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: C172 Captain
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins View Post
That's easy, because SKW has plenty of growth left. ASA and XJT are still very large operations ripe for the picking. RAH is as large as it will ever be for at least the next 50% of your aviation career.
SkyWest is reducing its fleet by 50% over the next 3 years. How is that "plenty of growth"? Sounds like the opposite to me.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryncreedy/2016/01/27/regional-airlines-more-communities-threatened-as-partners-shift-flying-to-mainline/#3a837c75228b
KCaviator is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 01:38 PM
  #403  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by KCaviator View Post
SkyWest is reducing its fleet by 50% over the next 3 years. How is that "plenty of growth"? Sounds like the opposite to me.

Forbes Welcome
Your answer is the post you quoted...
snippercr is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 01:41 PM
  #404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by KCaviator View Post
SkyWest is reducing its fleet by 50% over the next 3 years. How is that "plenty of growth"? Sounds like the opposite to me.

Forbes Welcome
Did you even read the whole article or did you just grab that one sentence out? Tell you what, I am going to take one sentence out and sum the whole story up.

She sees the industry consolidating with SkyWest an obvious winner. Ominously, however, the fate of Republic Airways, the only other publicly held regional airline, remains to be seen as reported in this Forbes story.

The 50% is SkyWest Inc that includes ASA and XJet. 50 seaters are going away, and better contracts are being signed for 70 seats. SW is stockpiling pilots and waiting to grab flying from those airlines that can't staff it.

Trust me, I don't agree with the way a lot of things are done here. But BB has shown his incompetence with managing Republic and taking the stock from around $15 per share to around $2 over the last year. If it were me just starting out, I wouldn't ignore the way management at Republic has treated their pilot group for the past 10 years and just focus on what it has been like over the past couple months. But that is just my opinion.
disillusioned is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 03:24 PM
  #405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

so you're for shaft ejt/asa to benefit skw pilots. 50 percent is 50 percent no matter where it comes from. 50 percent reduction from wherever it comes is still 50 percent less profits. skw can stock pile pilots all it wants, all that means is that they are expecting to lose pilots in hoards. skw balance sheet wont support indefinite paying pilots to be just stock piled.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 03:31 PM
  #406  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
so you're for shaft ejt/asa to benefit skw pilots. 50 percent is 50 percent no matter where it comes from. 50 percent reduction from wherever it comes is still 50 percent less profits. skw can stock pile pilots all it wants, all that means is that they are expecting to lose pilots in hoards. skw balance sheet wont support indefinite paying pilots to be just stock piled.
Skywest airlines and Asa are profitable. Express jet is not. They are reducing that flying while increasing their profitable flying. They are expecting to lose pilots... from express jet which they are perfectly happy with.
IFLYPLANEZBRO is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 04:27 PM
  #407  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cf105's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Piloto
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO View Post
Skywest airlines and Asa are profitable. Express jet is not. They are reducing that flying while increasing their profitable flying. They are expecting to lose pilots... from express jet which they are perfectly happy with.
Doesn't matter which of their 3 airlines is profitable or not, overall, it seems that things are not that hunky dory since they have to cut down up to 50% of their fleet and sacrifice/lay off pilots who go along with it, whatever certificate is on the hat, in order to make profit. Doesn't matter if it's SKW, ASA or Xjets, it's all the same group. Killing my sick cow and keeping my 2 healthy ones, doest make me a good farmer, I somehow didn't manage to keep the 3 of them healthy. Just delaying the infection to the other 2. Not a very positive outlook.
cf105 is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 04:31 PM
  #408  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cf105's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Piloto
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81 View Post
In 5 yrs it won't matter where you're at since the regionals will be a shell of their former selves and most everyone on this board will be at a major.
Oh that mantra of APC. Until the major have the financial and physical means to absorb and handle the entire flights taken care by the regionals today... a lot of water can pass under the bridge. 5 years seems pretty optimistic.

unless we go through another major catastrophic financial crisis resulting in drastic reduction in business and leisure travel and the closures of airlines and airports.

But, since it's been predicted for the past 10 years... it will happen one day
cf105 is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 07:13 PM
  #409  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,847
Default

Originally Posted by cf105 View Post
Oh that mantra of APC. Until the major have the financial and physical means to absorb and handle the entire flights taken care by the regionals today... a lot of water can pass under the bridge. 5 years seems pretty optimistic.

unless we go through another major catastrophic financial crisis resulting in drastic reduction in business and leisure travel and the closures of airlines and airports.

But, since it's been predicted for the past 10 years... it will happen one day
RAH already can't handle what's on their plate. Parking 145's against DL's wishes and in a lawsuit over it. Halved the UAL order due to staffing. Parked all the Q400's early.

Everywhere else seems like a shell game with mainline moving chess pieces to whomever can staff it right now, then moving again when staffing is a problem. Between UAL, DL, and WN alone there's going to be around 2600 or so hired THIS YEAR. That's more than the RAH list alone. It's happening.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 02-09-2016, 03:54 AM
  #410  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 19
Default

Question:
I left the company after almost exactly a year. I recently got s letter saying I owe them money to pay back the signing bonus they gave me when I started. Is this a legit thing or is it a scare tactic of some sort?
Flyingthomas is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Republic Airways
193
09-17-2015 11:35 AM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM
Pilot41
Regional
10
10-13-2007 03:43 PM
Gordon C
Regional
0
04-21-2005 06:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices