Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash >

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Ethiopian 737 MAX 8 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2019, 08:24 PM
  #501  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Let's hope you never have to prove that you could do it.
Keep it under the red line by clicking off the A/T? I hope I don't have to... but I don't see it being much of a challenge either.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 08:27 PM
  #502  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
the whole premise of aviation certification standards are, that planes should not have failure modes that require skills that only the top 1% of pilots have.

It's easy to sit here and say how you would just "fly the airplane" and "control the airspeed" etc, when you're not in the hot seat as multiple conflicting messages and warnings are presented to you at the same time, with insufficient training to understand the system logic that might cause all of them.

Yes, it is easy, but some accident crews make it easier than others, especially when the apparent deficiency lies in basic flying fundamentals. And yes, appropriate and judicious application of pitch trim is something I would reasonably expect from any pilot with a solo endorsement, let alone a type rating in a transport category aircraft. I certainly remember in primary training how quickly I learned the importance of pitch trim; could not hold altitude or airspeed worth a darn unless I used it, and used it often; it eventually became instinctive. If this is a skill that only the "top 1%" have...then that's a problem.



While everyone is busy piling on Boeing, nobody is asking about the basic training and experience (or lack thereof) that the accident crews had. Here in the states, we get up in arms whenever someone suggests relaxing the 1500 hour/ATP rule. Whereas apparently in Ethiopia, pilots get typed at 100 TT, and that gets a pass.
flydrive is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 08:32 PM
  #503  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
Keep it under the red line by clicking off the A/T? I hope I don't have to... but I don't see it being much of a challenge either.
Clicking off the A/T wouldn't have done anything in this case. TL's would've stayed at the climb setting.
But you obviously would've immediately realized that oh, the stick shaker is false (look at the yoke reaction - he initiated a stall recovery due to the shaker), and pulled back on the thrust levers even when you're not exactly sure why the shaker is going off, your airspeed readings are off, and you have all sorts of other warnings and conflicting messages showing up.

I'm glad everyone here is such a superior pilot that something that has killed 2 qualified crews would not be "much of a challenge".
dera is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 08:33 PM
  #504  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
Default

Originally Posted by flydrive View Post

While everyone is busy piling on Boeing, nobody is asking about the basic training and experience (or lack thereof) that the accident crews had. Here in the states, we get up in arms whenever someone suggests relaxing the 1500 hour/ATP rule. Whereas apparently in Ethiopia, pilots get typed at 100 TT, and that gets a pass.
Clearly the ATP rule worked well for the Atlas crew.
dera is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 08:50 PM
  #505  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Clicking off the A/T wouldn't have done anything in this case. TL's would've stayed at the climb setting.
But you obviously would've immediately realized that oh, the stick shaker is false (look at the yoke reaction - he initiated a stall recovery due to the shaker), and pulled back on the thrust levers even when you're not exactly sure why the shaker is going off, your airspeed readings are off, and you have all sorts of other warnings and conflicting messages showing up.

I'm glad everyone here is such a superior pilot that something that has killed 2 qualified crews would not be "much of a challenge".
Airspeed was close enough to be reliable for discerning a stall (or not) the whole time.
Groundspeed and looking out the window could've helped as well.
Only one side had activated for the shaker (big clue right there).
At no point did anyone pull back the thrust levers.

I get it, initial reaction, shaker goes off, yeah probably try a stall recovery... it's what they spring load us to do in training.

None of that excuses the next 5 minutes of staying at basically full thrust. Nearly 3 minutes of which was in overspeed. If you can't comprehend this basic fact of how this accident happened then you do not belong anywhere near an aircraft.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 08:51 PM
  #506  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
Airspeed was close enough to be reliable for discerning a stall (or not) the whole time.
Groundspeed and looking out the window could've helped as well.
Only one side had activated for the shaker (big clue right there).
At no point did anyone pull back the thrust levers.

I get it, initial reaction, shaker goes off, yeah probably try a stall recovery... it's what they spring load us to do in training.

None of that excuses the next 5 minutes of staying at basically full thrust. Nearly 3 minutes of which was in overspeed. If you can't comprehend this basic fact of how this accident happened then you do not belong anywhere near an aircraft.
Congrats, the monday morning quarterback of the week award goes to you.
dera is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 08:53 PM
  #507  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Congrats, the monday morning quarterback of the week award goes to you.
Seriously - your ATP needs to be revoked for stupidity.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 09:03 PM
  #508  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by flydrive View Post
While everyone is busy piling on Boeing, nobody is asking about the basic training and experience (or lack thereof) that the accident crews had. Here in the states, we get up in arms whenever someone suggests relaxing the 1500 hour/ATP rule. Whereas apparently in Ethiopia, pilots get typed at 100 TT, and that gets a pass.
I don’t want to venture down this rabbit hole again, but hours in your logbook mean nothing. It’s quality over quantity in aviation. They may have better training programs than in the states. FAA regulation is not supreme throughout the world, nor does it provide the safest environments in all aspects. The hour comparison of a foreign trained pilot to a pilot trained in the states is irrelevant. Look at EASA for example. I don’t know you, but I can guess fairly confidently you wouldn’t pass their training.

It’s easy to read a “report” from the comforts of your own home playing xbox and eating Doritos, judging the crew on what they should/shouldn’t have done. The point is they were set up for failure from the very beginning, out of their control unfortunately.
stabapch is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:33 PM
  #509  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,023
Default

It's hard to claim that pilots followed procedure if they cut off stab trim, then put the switches back again.

Which procedure is it that directs crew to re-establish stab trim by returning the stab trim cutoff switches to their former position?

Originally Posted by MySaabStory View Post
Well said.

Sofa pilots are Sofa King dumb and hard to listen to.
No, not well said, at all. You're responding to the statement that any event is recoverable.

This is not true. Not every event is recoverable. Not by a long, damn shot.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:51 PM
  #510  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Passenger
Posts: 10
Default

Pretty sure that reducing thrust in the Max would increase NOSE DOWN pitch -- for the same reason that MCAS exists in the first place.
pacnw77 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-05-2007 06:23 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
09-07-2005 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices