Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Accident today, Naples FL... >

Accident today, Naples FL...

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Accident today, Naples FL...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2024 | 11:01 AM
  #31  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,052
Likes: 70
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by Brickhut
Lattest scuttlebut is bad fuel. Story I heard is that this was a rescue for another operator that apparently got some type of fuel filter bypass warning on taxi out. As I understand, they only took on the min 300 gallons to waive the ramp fee. Again, just a story I'm hearing, but seems very plausible. I think we can all agree that there was fuel on board when they crashed with how badly it burned.

I'm wondering if we're lookin at a BA38 type situation?
British Airways Flight 38 - Wikipedia
Bad fuel would have caused an issue hours ago.

BA38 is possible, not sure what the temps aloft were. On a short flight like this it just sounds implausible.

The fire isn't that violent. there is tens of liters of unusable fuel that will burn even if engines have flamed out due to fuel starvation.

We will wait and see.
Reply
Old 02-19-2024 | 05:01 PM
  #32  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 693
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear
If bad fuel why did it take so long to cause a problem?
Bad fuel as in wrong formulation, wrong additives you'd think would manifest quickly.

If it was contaminated with particulates, that could take a while to clog the filters.
Reply
Old 02-20-2024 | 09:52 AM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Bad fuel as in wrong formulation, wrong additives you'd think would manifest quickly.

If it was contaminated with particulates, that could take a while to clog the filters.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_Pacific_Flight_780

took about 2:30 hours for it to significantly impact Cathay 780
Reply
Old 02-27-2024 | 01:19 PM
  #34  
EyeKantEven's Avatar
Clean it up - make it BIG
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 248
Likes: 5
From: B737NG forward-facing aft lav
Default

Prelim out today.

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/a...ort/193769/pdf

EICAS warnings "L ENGINE OIL PRESSURE" and "R ENGINE OIL PRESSURE" occurred at the same time approx 70 seconds prior to impact.

Report suggests fuel filters were clear, and fuel was present throughout most of the fuel system.

This is a curious one.

Could the power levers have jumped the idle / shutoff gate? Or the tabs perhaps were inadvertently lifted by the pilot while reducing power to idle?

CVR will help. But "Sh1t!" could mean anything...

Thoughts?

Last edited by EyeKantEven; 02-27-2024 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old 02-27-2024 | 03:56 PM
  #35  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

The fuel controls showed mechanically in idle position so it's possible they brought the thrust levers back out of cutoff? The FDR will show if they went into cutoff or not.
Reply
Old 02-27-2024 | 07:14 PM
  #36  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,052
Likes: 70
From: Whale FO
Default

Shutting down the engines accidentally would go real well in this Age 67 discussion.
Reply
Old 02-27-2024 | 07:45 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,418
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by dera
Shutting down the engines accidentally would go real well in this Age 67 discussion.
Captain was 50. 2,800 hrs in type. FO was 65, 138 hrs in type.
Reply
Old 02-27-2024 | 08:15 PM
  #38  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Captain was 50. 2,800 hrs in type. FO was 65, 138 hrs in type.
Well thank God neither of them was 67. It could have really turned out badly.
Reply
Old 02-28-2024 | 08:07 AM
  #39  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 693
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by EyeKantEven
Could the power levers have jumped the idle / shutoff gate? Or the tabs perhaps were inadvertently lifted by the pilot while reducing power to idle?
A buddy told me that he thought the fuel shutoff gate on the levers could be triggered inadervently by the PIC reaching across for the flaps as the SIC idles the levers. Levers could push the PIC's foream down against the latches, latches somehow get activated, and the levers could then continue past idle to cutoff, assuming the SIC was somewhat aggressive with his power chop.

CRJ had a similar shutoff latch, but I don't recall anything like that ever happening. I think the CRJ latches had to be pulled up? Been a long time. Maybe a sleeve got caught?

I do remember that when I shut the engines down that I was meticulous about doing them deliberately and one at a time with a pause, to avoid developing any dangerous muscle memory that might bite me in the heat of the moment. After watching CA's grabbing both and shutting it all done in one smooth motion.
Reply
Old 02-28-2024 | 10:00 AM
  #40  
BigZ's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
CRJ had a similar shutoff latch, but I don't recall anything like that ever happening. I think the CRJ latches had to be pulled up? Been a long time. Maybe a sleeve got caught?
If I remember right, there was a 700 in China about 5 years back. CA was "guarding" the throttles, FO chopped them back with enough intent to cause the gates to go up against CA's hand and shut both down on short final.
That one still made the runway though
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
inter09
Safety
14
10-10-2010 10:11 AM
Whacker77
Aviation Law
1
12-19-2008 11:15 AM
stinsonjr
Hangar Talk
8
12-09-2007 02:29 PM
Normy!
Hangar Talk
22
07-17-2007 04:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices