Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Accident today, Naples FL... >

Accident today, Naples FL...

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Accident today, Naples FL...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2024, 11:01 AM
  #31  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,494
Default

Originally Posted by Brickhut View Post
Lattest scuttlebut is bad fuel. Story I heard is that this was a rescue for another operator that apparently got some type of fuel filter bypass warning on taxi out. As I understand, they only took on the min 300 gallons to waive the ramp fee. Again, just a story I'm hearing, but seems very plausible. I think we can all agree that there was fuel on board when they crashed with how badly it burned.

I'm wondering if we're lookin at a BA38 type situation?
British Airways Flight 38 - Wikipedia
Bad fuel would have caused an issue hours ago.

BA38 is possible, not sure what the temps aloft were. On a short flight like this it just sounds implausible.

The fire isn't that violent. there is tens of liters of unusable fuel that will burn even if engines have flamed out due to fuel starvation.

We will wait and see.
dera is offline  
Old 02-19-2024, 05:01 PM
  #32  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,405
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
If bad fuel why did it take so long to cause a problem?
Bad fuel as in wrong formulation, wrong additives you'd think would manifest quickly.

If it was contaminated with particulates, that could take a while to clog the filters.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-20-2024, 09:52 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 721
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Bad fuel as in wrong formulation, wrong additives you'd think would manifest quickly.

If it was contaminated with particulates, that could take a while to clog the filters.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_Pacific_Flight_780

took about 2:30 hours for it to significantly impact Cathay 780
Broncofan is offline  
Old 02-27-2024, 01:19 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EyeKantEven's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: B737NG forward-facing aft lav
Posts: 125
Default

Prelim out today.

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/a...ort/193769/pdf

EICAS warnings "L ENGINE OIL PRESSURE" and "R ENGINE OIL PRESSURE" occurred at the same time approx 70 seconds prior to impact.

Report suggests fuel filters were clear, and fuel was present throughout most of the fuel system.

This is a curious one.

Could the power levers have jumped the idle / shutoff gate? Or the tabs perhaps were inadvertently lifted by the pilot while reducing power to idle?

CVR will help. But "Sh1t!" could mean anything...

Thoughts?

Last edited by EyeKantEven; 02-27-2024 at 01:35 PM.
EyeKantEven is offline  
Old 02-27-2024, 03:56 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,236
Default

The fuel controls showed mechanically in idle position so it's possible they brought the thrust levers back out of cutoff? The FDR will show if they went into cutoff or not.
trip is offline  
Old 02-27-2024, 07:14 PM
  #36  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,494
Default

Shutting down the engines accidentally would go real well in this Age 67 discussion.
dera is offline  
Old 02-27-2024, 07:45 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,245
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Shutting down the engines accidentally would go real well in this Age 67 discussion.
Captain was 50. 2,800 hrs in type. FO was 65, 138 hrs in type.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 02-27-2024, 08:15 PM
  #38  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,076
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback View Post
Captain was 50. 2,800 hrs in type. FO was 65, 138 hrs in type.
Well thank God neither of them was 67. It could have really turned out badly.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 02-28-2024, 08:07 AM
  #39  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,405
Default

Originally Posted by EyeKantEven View Post
Could the power levers have jumped the idle / shutoff gate? Or the tabs perhaps were inadvertently lifted by the pilot while reducing power to idle?
A buddy told me that he thought the fuel shutoff gate on the levers could be triggered inadervently by the PIC reaching across for the flaps as the SIC idles the levers. Levers could push the PIC's foream down against the latches, latches somehow get activated, and the levers could then continue past idle to cutoff, assuming the SIC was somewhat aggressive with his power chop.

CRJ had a similar shutoff latch, but I don't recall anything like that ever happening. I think the CRJ latches had to be pulled up? Been a long time. Maybe a sleeve got caught?

I do remember that when I shut the engines down that I was meticulous about doing them deliberately and one at a time with a pause, to avoid developing any dangerous muscle memory that might bite me in the heat of the moment. After watching CA's grabbing both and shutting it all done in one smooth motion.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-28-2024, 10:00 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,055
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
CRJ had a similar shutoff latch, but I don't recall anything like that ever happening. I think the CRJ latches had to be pulled up? Been a long time. Maybe a sleeve got caught?
If I remember right, there was a 700 in China about 5 years back. CA was "guarding" the throttles, FO chopped them back with enough intent to cause the gates to go up against CA's hand and shut both down on short final.
That one still made the runway though
BigZ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
inter09
Safety
14
10-10-2010 10:11 AM
Whacker77
Aviation Law
1
12-19-2008 11:15 AM
stinsonjr
Hangar Talk
8
12-09-2007 02:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices