So controllers get more rest.........
04-17-2011 | 04:43 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
So controllers get more rest.........
Well that was an extremely quick change on behalf of the FAA. I understand that controllers are a vital part of the system and also deserve better work rules. However, if a controller falls asleep it may not be as critical as when a pilot falls asleep. But no changes, and I hate to say it but I don't think we will actually see any changes.
Anyone care to comment, complain, vent?
Anyone care to comment, complain, vent?
04-17-2011 | 04:58 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: NU Guy
Well that was an extremely quick change on behalf of the FAA. I understand that controllers are a vital part of the system and also deserve better work rules. However, if a controller falls asleep it may not be as critical as when a pilot falls asleep. But no changes, and I hate to say it but I don't think we will actually see any changes.
Anyone care to comment, complain, vent?
Anyone care to comment, complain, vent?
We should all be contacting the media outlets and raising the *** flag on this one.
04-17-2011 | 05:35 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
There hasn't been any recent reports about pilots sleeping on the job. But suddenly, all these reports about sleeping controllers. That's the difference.
Did Canada approve some sort of program to allow pilots to sleep during shift? I think I heard something about that. Anyone? Bueller?
Did Canada approve some sort of program to allow pilots to sleep during shift? I think I heard something about that. Anyone? Bueller?
04-17-2011 | 05:55 PM
#4
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
The harsh truth is, if they need more controllers to cover the gaps in the rest rules all they have to do is raise taxes and throw around some more cash like the govt always does.
If the airlines need more pilots, they have to raise ticket prices. I think that's the bottom line.
Maybe we need to start taking one for the team, and start falling asleep in the cockpit. Just blatantly start taking naps where we set our cell phones as alarms. Sounds silly but hey............ what are ya gonna do?
If the airlines need more pilots, they have to raise ticket prices. I think that's the bottom line.
Maybe we need to start taking one for the team, and start falling asleep in the cockpit. Just blatantly start taking naps where we set our cell phones as alarms. Sounds silly but hey............ what are ya gonna do?
04-17-2011 | 07:36 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Kickin it "C"old School in AK
The harsh truth is, if they need more controllers to cover the gaps in the rest rules all they have to do is raise taxes and throw around some more cash like the govt always does.
If the airlines need more pilots, they have to raise ticket prices. I think that's the bottom line.
If the airlines need more pilots, they have to raise ticket prices. I think that's the bottom line.
04-17-2011 | 09:52 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Kickin it "C"old School in AK
PressTV - US sets new air traffic control rules
How'd you become a moderator without the internet?
04-17-2011 | 09:56 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
A bunch of non-rules. 9 hour rest. Really?
So, I can still show up for work at 6am, work until 2pm, come back at 11pm, and work until 7am? Oh, a manager will be pulling in overtime until 1am.
I fall asleep at 3am.
Ya, good stuff.
So, I can still show up for work at 6am, work until 2pm, come back at 11pm, and work until 7am? Oh, a manager will be pulling in overtime until 1am.
I fall asleep at 3am.
Ya, good stuff.
04-18-2011 | 04:05 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
04-18-2011 | 08:30 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Kickin it "C"old School in AK
Controllers must be asking themselves, "Why didn't we do this before?"
I don't disagree with you, moderator TW, it's not as good as it looks, but the fact is that non-fatal errors resulted in IMMEDIATE change on that side, while our side of the fence requires fatalities and multi-year arguments and lobbyi$ts to effect change. And even then sometimes no change on our side while fatalities continue...
I don't disagree with you, moderator TW, it's not as good as it looks, but the fact is that non-fatal errors resulted in IMMEDIATE change on that side, while our side of the fence requires fatalities and multi-year arguments and lobbyi$ts to effect change. And even then sometimes no change on our side while fatalities continue...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miker1369
Major
1
12-01-2006 02:42 PM
