Malaysian 777 missing
08-08-2020 | 03:44 AM
#1121
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
or at least what I could understand
08-08-2020 | 08:15 AM
#1122
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
It's a stretch, but stranger things have happened. I'm not sold either way.
08-08-2020 | 03:38 PM
#1123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 62
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
How many years was the speculation for AF447 til the DFDR was found? Hopefully the DFDR will be recovered in less years it took to find the Titanic.
08-08-2020 | 07:43 PM
#1124
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
The max operating altitude limitation of 43,100 has to do with pressurization and cabin differential. It has NOTHING to do with how high the airplane can physically fly. Any professional pilot knows that.
08-08-2020 | 10:20 PM
#1125
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From the author “nicknamepilot”, Quote “No 777 can fly above 43,100 feet”.... And you just lost any and all credibility.
The max operating altitude limitation of 43,100 has to do with pressurization and cabin differential. It has NOTHING to do with how high the airplane can physically fly. Any professional pilot knows that.
The max operating altitude limitation of 43,100 has to do with pressurization and cabin differential. It has NOTHING to do with how high the airplane can physically fly. Any professional pilot knows that.
08-08-2020 | 10:28 PM
#1126
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
interesting. I’ll have to dig for that. This was the first time I heard that the aircraft had an in flight fire two weeks prior to the disappearance.
08-09-2020 | 07:32 AM
#1127
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
The flight manual limit of 43,100 is simply a cabin pressurization limitation. The airplane is capable of flying much higher than 43,100. Claiming that the radar track altitude data was impossible because a flight manual altitude limitation was exceeded is absolutely incorrect and it immediately proves that the author is not a professional pilot, and has very limited or no aerospace/ commercial aviation knowledge. He’s a blogger with decent google search skills, He has no real world knowledge and as such should not be trusted to provide accurate information on this subject.
Just FYI.
12-09-2023 | 04:01 PM
#1128
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Home
Plausible theory
An interesting video that strings multiple known facts into a very interesting theory....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhkTo9Rk6_4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhkTo9Rk6_4
12-09-2023 | 04:19 PM
#1129
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgmann
Foreign
25
01-30-2008 11:26 AM
