JohnBurke

There is no evidence that the loss was not an accident, or that it was. There is no evidence. Only speculation and guesswork, and wild conspiracy theories.

It may be in the Indian Ocean.

It may not.

PNWFlyer

actually, yes there is evidence this was intentional, and you know that.

no accident has a plane go dark the exact moment it is crossing an FIR into another country then fly a path to intentionally avoid radar contact… well radars that they knew about. Then pieces of the plane are found years later that showed damage form a crash and marine growth consistent with being in the Indian Ocean for the amount of time the plane has been missing.

that is not a conspiracy theory.
.

JohnBurke

It's absolutely conspiracy bull ****.

Timing is not evidence. It's circumstance.

You don't know that a course was flown to avoid radar. That's wild speculative conjecture. It also sounds like you've never flown over the ocean.

Pieces of aircraft could have wound up almost anywhere in the world. If those pieces had been in the Indian Ocean for a time, obviously they might contain "marine growth consistent with..." but that's not evidence of anything other than a piece of an airframe. It describes nothing of intent in the operation of the aircrft, course, or anything else.

Maybe if you say the words slower or faster you'll sound more convincing. Put some space aliens in there, or baby-eating pizza shops. Maybe some vaccine stories, to really sell it. That's the ticket.

Stan446

[QUOTE=JohnBurke;3735738]It's absolutely conspiracy bull ****.


Maybe if you say the words slower or faster you'll sound more convincing. Put some space aliens in there, or baby-eating pizza shops. Maybe some vaccine stories, to really sell it. That's the ticket.[/QUOT

Yawn, You really don't have much going on in your life.

PNWFlyer

whoa dude. You must have me confused with someone else. I just post the Hillary stuff because I think it is funny. Oh, and Democrats do not “eat babies” in Pizza shops. That is gross, and a little ridiculous, they drain their blood and drink it to stay young. Even my explanation is not exactly accurate. They don’t just drink the blood. They extract the adrenochrome from the blood and drink that.

Anyway, them going dark at the FIR boundary and making a turn and heading for the ocean then turning when “civilian” radars can’t see them is not a “coincidence“.

You also said it might not be in the Indian Ocean! Well, the “evidence” found on the recovered pieces says otherwise. Sorry, so mistook you for someone that was a little more educated. But I can help. For an object to have marine growth consistent with being in the Indian Ocean for a period of time, it can be concluded that it has been in the Indian Ocean for that time. It was also found, on a beach… in the Indian Ocean.

but you keep thinking it is in a jungle in Cambodia near Hillary Clinton’s child blood harvesting compound.

rickair7777

At this point the circumstantial evidence is piled pretty high against the CA.

I proposed theories involving fires in the early days, even when many were quick to blame the CA (boeing has a long history of fabricating pilot love triangle suicide fantasies to cover up fatal design flaws).

But after years of analysis the digital forensics are pretty damning, even though it's circumstantial. The airplane flew a course, with several turns, which appeared designed to straddle airspace boundaries to avoid military interdiction and create ATC confusion. It's also reported that the CA executed the same profile on his home flight sim shortly before the flight... and then fast forwared to the middle of the IO. If everything reported in that youtube video is accurate, then it's fairly obvious what happened.

But I haven't heard of a plausible motive yet, so there's that.

And yes it is in the IO. Physics don't lie and that's where the SATCOM emissions say he ended up.

JohnBurke

I correctly said we don't know where the aicraft is. This is a fact.

Because pieces of the aircraft may have been located in the Indian ocean, does NOT mean the aircraft is in the Indian ocean. It means that pieces of the aircraft ended up there; a conclusion cannot be drawn. No assuptions.

The aircraft may be there. It may not.

Circumstantial details surely make fun datapoints for the conspiracy brighsparks, though. Assumption, as they say, is the mother of all ****ups, and some truly love their mothers, as we continue to see.

I would like to think so.

You really need to learn how to quote.

Red Forman

It's getting worse and it's pathetic.

ShyGuy

So you're implying someone - an entity - ripped up parts of the flaperon and other aircraft pieces confirmed to be from MH370, and dumped them in the middle of the IO, and then found washed up ashore eastern African countries?

Sorry - that airplane is at the bottom of the IO. The washed up parts are the proof, along with the Inmarsat data of the southern arc.

Brickfire

There is derived satcom telemetry showing it over the Indian Ocean. Unless it went there, dropped decoy pieces then was transported elsewhere ... it's in the big gigantic Indian Oceean somewhere