Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2023 | 05:10 PM
  #1131  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
So I watched all that. Well put together for a general interest piece. Can the airframe ever be found? What was the point of it?
It can be found. Worst case it might take the better part of a century, like the Titanic.

Eventually somebody will fund a autonomous UUV or maybe a surface platform to drive around the IO and do a sonar search of the bottom. Like Titanic, eventually technology will be affordable enough for a historical interest project. The wreckage isn't going anywhere.
Reply
Old 12-10-2023 | 07:07 PM
  #1132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,510
Likes: 138
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It can be found. Worst case it might take the better part of a century, like the Titanic.

Eventually somebody will fund a autonomous UUV or maybe a surface platform to drive around the IO and do a sonar search of the bottom. Like Titanic, eventually technology will be affordable enough for a historical interest project. The wreckage isn't going anywhere.
Indeed. Stays right there. A lot of thought went into hiding it. Has to be a trail. No crime is unsolvable.
Reply
Old 12-11-2023 | 06:15 AM
  #1133  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

Conspiracy bull ****.

Nobody is hiding the aircraft. It's a very big ocean.
Reply
Old 12-11-2023 | 08:32 AM
  #1134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,510
Likes: 138
Default

Ocean big, never occurred to me. Full of secrets maybe? Which is why it’s lost. No accident either.
Reply
Old 12-12-2023 | 05:25 AM
  #1135  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 155
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke
Conspiracy bull ****.

Nobody is hiding the aircraft. It's a very big ocean.
I think they meant “hiding it” by crashing the aircraft if a very remote, deep and mountainous part of the ocean. The Titanic was relatively easy to find, flat ocean floor. Try finding it in an underwater mountain rage.

Also, it is going somewhere. Currents can move it around and spread it out. That is why they find a piece every so often washed up somewhere. It would take some Star Trek level sensors to find this thing now.
Reply
Old 12-12-2023 | 06:01 AM
  #1136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,510
Likes: 138
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
I think they meant “hiding it” by crashing the aircraft if a very remote, deep and mountainous part of the ocean. The Titanic was relatively easy to find, flat ocean floor. Try finding it in an underwater mountain rage.

Also, it is going somewhere. Currents can move it around and spread it out. That is why they find a piece every so often washed up somewhere. It would take some Star Trek level sensors to find this thing now.
Exactly. There's got to be a way to locate the lost bigfoot.
Reply
Old 12-12-2023 | 06:29 AM
  #1137  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
I think they meant “hiding it” by crashing the aircraft if a very remote, deep and mountainous part of the ocean. The Titanic was relatively easy to find, flat ocean floor. Try finding it in an underwater mountain rage.

Also, it is going somewhere. Currents can move it around and spread it out. That is why they find a piece every so often washed up somewhere. It would take some Star Trek level sensors to find this thing now.
The stuff they are finding are small parts that float. Surface currents can take floaty stuff all over the world.

The big pieces are too heavy to get moved around on the bottom.

Harder to find on uneven bottom surfaces but not impossible... aluminum has different characteristics than rock. Also other than the Perth/Aarbian Gulf shipping lane, the search region is very lightly travelled so shouldn't be too much man-made debris out there. Especially since there would have been almost no shipping traffic anywhere in that area prior to the modern age and petroleum... supertankers don't sink nearly as often as the sailing ships of yore.

The real challenge is that, compared to most famous shipwrecks, the search area is exceptionally large. Either need to narrow it down a bit or use autnonomous search vehicles which don't require an expensive surface support ship. Yes the USN has such things, for different applications... turn 'em loose and let them do their thing for months on end. They'll report back periodically.
Reply
Old 12-12-2023 | 07:05 AM
  #1138  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 155
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The stuff they are finding are small parts that float. Surface currents can take floaty stuff all over the world.

The big pieces are too heavy to get moved around on the bottom.

Harder to find on uneven bottom surfaces but not impossible... aluminum has different characteristics than rock. Also other than the Perth/Aarbian Gulf shipping lane, the search region is very lightly travelled so shouldn't be too much man-made debris out there. Especially since there would have been almost no shipping traffic anywhere in that area prior to the modern age and petroleum... supertankers don't sink nearly as often as the sailing ships of yore.

The real challenge is that, compared to most famous shipwrecks, the search area is exceptionally large. Either need to narrow it down a bit or use autnonomous search vehicles which don't require an expensive surface support ship. Yes the USN has such things, for different applications... turn 'em loose and let them do their thing for months on end. They'll report back periodically.
yeah, but how many big pieces and just how big? Was it crashed nicely, or vertical at 420 knots? Once on the bottom the heavy pieces won’t move, but they sure got moved around on the long trip to the bottom. I do hope a large price is one day found.

you are right. Autonomous search vehicles are the only way. Remember, whoever did this went to great lengths to make sure there was no way to pinpoint where it crashed. From where the pieces washed up all we know for sure is it was the Indian Ocean.
Reply
Old 12-12-2023 | 07:08 AM
  #1139  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 155
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Indeed. Stays right there. A lot of thought went into hiding it. Has to be a trail. No crime is unsolvable.
no crime is unsolvable????

Reply
Old 12-12-2023 | 10:56 AM
  #1140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,510
Likes: 138
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
no crime is unsolvable????
Solved v prosecuted. There’s a difference. Somewhere on a seabed the shoes of MH370 await discovery.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices