Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2014 | 05:50 AM
  #631  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

See, I think the 777 flight computer became self aware, and rebelled against its human opposition.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:01 AM
  #632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I'm not saying this couldn't have happened, but when I got to this quote I pretty much figured he's another GA "expert."

"Maybe some of the younger pilots interviewed on CNN didn't pick up on this left turn. We old pilots were always drilled to always know the closest airport of safe harbor while in cruise."
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 09:13 AM
  #633  
olympic's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: 747
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Great analysis.
It's disturbing how CNN is drilling the pilots.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 09:35 AM
  #634  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: C-130J
Default

Originally Posted by Past V1
Very interesting theory, worthy enough to post and hear your thoughts...

Keith Ledgerwood ? Did Malaysian Airlines 370 disappear using SIA68/SQ68 (another 777)?

Would love to see them enact that rejoin at night, without NVGs, while the Singapore 777 is moving at .84 and Malaysian 777 is attempting to overtake it at red line with a 7 mile turn radius. And of course staying at of wake turbulence, lack of SKE to back up position without NVGs, and so on. And of course done by a brand new 777 copilot and neither had done that before.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 09:43 AM
  #635  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Default

Maybe the fire broke out, they put their diversion airport (they would have known ahead of time which ones they would be right? Even before take-off) into the GPS/enable autopilot and then both get up to fight the fire and eventually they succumb to the flames/smoke fighting it.

The idea of them both getting up and leaving the cabin is a stretch, but that would explain why there was no radio call. But then that leaves the transponder, oh i don't know.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 09:44 AM
  #636  
savall's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: French American
Default

The amateur air crash investigators are really upping their game this week.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 10:01 AM
  #637  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Default

There is no guarantee at all that the oxygen bottles in the cockpit were serviced with 'aviators breathing oxygen' which is 100 percent oxygen. They may have been serviced with 'compressed breathing air' used by firefighters and rescue personnel. It has happened at least once which resulted in a fatal accident.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 10:10 AM
  #638  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Fire Lieutenant
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx
There is no guarantee at all that the oxygen bottles in the cockpit were serviced with 'aviators breathing oxygen' which is 100 percent oxygen. They may have been serviced with 'compressed breathing air' used by firefighters and rescue personnel. It has happened at least once which resulted in a fatal accident.
? Huh?? You busting stones? Because if you are that is both well played and funny.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 10:20 AM
  #639  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Alright, I have to ask this again about the ELT. Wouldn't a B777 in 2014 have a 406mhz ELT on it?

If it crashed then the ELT would have been activated by impact and within a minute an encoded digital message to a satelite saying the ELT's ID/aircraft ID, country code and coordinates. I've seen it work.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 10:22 AM
  #640  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Default

I just have a hard time believing that there could be a fire severe enough to incapacitate the crew and cause the transponder to fail, but yet the aircraft continues to fly for five hours afterwards. And how could a fire cause only part of the ACARS system to fail?

Considering what little information we do know, a deliberate act by someone seems more likely than some sort of catastrophic failure. My guess is they may never find the aircraft and we may never know the answer. It took two years to find most of the Air France wreckage and they had a much better idea of where to look.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices