C Series Info

Subscribe
233  283  323  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  336  337  343  383 
Page 333 of 396
Go to
Quote: The seals which had been stressed by the engines being required to operate on the back side of the power curve for a prolonged period of time despite the stick shaker going off five (5) times before a dual engine flameout that then was GROSSLY mishandled including never coming within 40 knots of the recommended dual engine restart speed despite having seven MILES of altitude to give up, hence not ever providing the engines with the airflow needed to turn to avoid a core lock.

I mean, when you either negligentally or intentionally push things to destruction through unprofessional actions, yeah they are going to fail.

Blaming the failure on not being able to stand abuse that they should have never been exposed to in the first place and we’re out of their known envelope is sort of silly, don’t you think?

Like saying, yeah, I landed in a left wing low bank, in a slip to the left, on my left main gear, at a descent rate of 2000 from..., and the damn left gear failed.

Who’da thunk???

Again, I'm not disputing the reason(s) the accident happened. To the original posters message: He never said the seal caused the accident.
He said it was the reason for the core lock, which is a matter of legal record. Also, the original message was in the context of maybe the seals on the newer engines on some of the C-Series or Neo's is causing their issues, due to temperature difference. (Expansion/Contraction) He was simply stating a fact and pondering if something similar may be happening.

Relax Escargot
Reply
Can we all just....get along?
Rodney.jpg


In unrelated news, Delta has pushed back the inaugural service of the A220 due to the partial government shutdown.


Reply
Quote:
relax escargot :d

ommmmmmmmmmm
Reply
In unrelated news, Delta has pushed back the inaugural service of the A220 due to the partial government shutdown.[/QUOTE]

That's great news for the pilots transferring or upgrading but not so for the new-hires. The latter will have to sit and wait even longer on training pay.
Reply
Quote: The A220-500 is rumored to be sized in between the 7/8 Max. Either way the aircraft should be around 10K lbs lighter, and far more comfortable for passengers vs the 73.

What is the a220-500?
Reply
Quote: What is the a220-500?
The President of Airbus Commercial said that after the production plant in the US is finished, they plan a stretch on the A220. The A220-500 being the CS500 that was canceled when Bombardier fell on hard times, is the speculation.



The stretch is probably because the A318/319 is going away as it doesn't sell. No idea if that's the case, but it makes sense.
Reply
Also, the A220 got ETOPS180 approval this week - Available to do New York - London.
Reply
Quote: Also, the A220 got ETOPS180 approval this week - Available to do New York - London.
It might make NY to London on a good day. It won’t make London to NY on any day.
Reply
Quote: Also, the A220 got ETOPS180 approval this week - Available to do New York - London.
It only got approved in Canada...not FAA or EASA
Reply
Quote: It might make NY to London on a good day. It won’t make London to NY on any day.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...-city-new-york
Reply
233  283  323  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  336  337  343  383 
Page 333 of 396
Go to