Quote:
As someone who will be furloughed if the company goes that route, then do it. Look at how much money the company would save by furloughing 10%, 20%, and 30% of the pilots. If the amount saved on concession is going to keep the company running, then they have some serious financial revenue issues that a furlough is also imminent.
Nobody should want to take a pay cut, still get furloughed, and come back to that same pay cut.
Let the company continue its proud tradition of no furloughs based on no concessions.
Well I think after 9/11 SWAPA did offer some concessions to "supposedly" save furloughs, but the company is a lot bigger now and what some fear is that they will get concessions and then furlough anyway this time. It's a lot easier to keep the no furloughs bit going when your smaller, gets to be harder when your large. Originally Posted by LaunchMcQuack
Furlough or concession. The question previously posed is interesting. "When was the last time a concession saved the company from a furlough?"As someone who will be furloughed if the company goes that route, then do it. Look at how much money the company would save by furloughing 10%, 20%, and 30% of the pilots. If the amount saved on concession is going to keep the company running, then they have some serious financial revenue issues that a furlough is also imminent.
Nobody should want to take a pay cut, still get furloughed, and come back to that same pay cut.
Let the company continue its proud tradition of no furloughs based on no concessions.
It's like the housing market takes a 15% dip, the guy in Cali sitting on a $1million ranch home that has to liquidate eats $150K loss, the guy in OK who was in the same house that was selling for $200K only sees a $30K decline.