Quote:
Always make your calculations based in the minimum guaranteed. Remember, once they introduce a new fleet, lines will be awful for the first 4 to 6 months. They might not have your precious 80 to 90hrs a month, instead 72 to 78hrs.
Yea I'm done arguing numbers. You will skew the numbers to match your argument , I was giving a realistic estimate. If I wanted to skew the #s to the other side I could say that the health insurance increases don't hit 35% for 5 years from jets hitting the property and most F/Os will be Captains or at AA by then, but no we have to think about the worst possible scenario because that's definitely what's going to happen if we vote this in right? Wrong. Originally Posted by PilotJ3
What's making you so sure that you will credit 1,000 or more in one year?Always make your calculations based in the minimum guaranteed. Remember, once they introduce a new fleet, lines will be awful for the first 4 to 6 months. They might not have your precious 80 to 90hrs a month, instead 72 to 78hrs.
I'm a realist, and living in the reality of the situation I can completely understand voting NO or YES on this LOA. But vote NO or YES for the right reasons.
Vote NO because you want to stand up for the industry and stop the trend of pay caps and health insurance increases. Don't vote NO because you think you are taking some kind of pay cut, I assure you, you're not.