Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Envoy- Am. Eagle loses more flying to Skywest >

Envoy- Am. Eagle loses more flying to Skywest

Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Envoy- Am. Eagle loses more flying to Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2014, 10:03 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: CRJ
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by HermannGraf View Post
I am sorry the guys at Envoy that are fighting not only for themselves but for all pilots at the Regional level are seeing the flying go away to other places. Some pilots can say that we as pilots have nothing to do with it and that it is only management that is to blame but I see this flying coming to us as a clear result of our pilot group voting yes for our concessionary pay package that gave our management the opportunity to be even cheaper. Our vote result was wrong when others are fighting for us. The pilot group was told from different sources that we did not have any leverage and immediately after the vote media was full of our leverage. It is sad that we as a pilot group did not understand the situation better and that we did not stand stronger but it is done and we should learn from it. Negotiations are about to start again and this time we should stand firm and demand what we have lost in years. There will be plenty of flying around as every Regional will have a hard time finding pilots and attrition is killing them.
To the Envoy guys, I am sorry.
I agree it was a mistake to vote it in, however you are right negotiations start up again soon and it was only for a year. I think a lot of us had our eyes opened. Lets hope we have all learned and keep up the fight. Regionals are not a stepping stone anymore and we need to be treated as such.
AZFlyn1 is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 10:04 AM
  #12  
spuzzyair
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt View Post
I'm surprised the majors have made Skywest such a huge part of their feed. Exposes them to a ton of risk if Skywest ever has staffing problems.
I think OO is factoring in the fact that as the -200's get parked and the 76 seat jets come online, not quite 1 for 1, that the staffing levels should balance out a bit... if things get dire, they can always park the 120's and move those pilots over to jets. However, seeing as the Bro's are making cash hand over fist, its certainly the last resort.
 
Old 03-05-2014, 10:08 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

To be completely thorough, SkyWest Airlines currently does 1,018 average daily departures for United, 491 for Delta, 89 for US Airways, 87 for American and 29 for Alaska. Exact numbers are unavailable for ExpressJet but if I had to guess...

SkyWest, Inc. - 2,100 United, 1,500 Delta, 160 American, 89 US Airways and 29 Alaska.

I don't believe Envoy has much to worry about at this point.
NVUS is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 01:26 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by HermannGraf View Post
I am sorry the guys at Envoy that are fighting not only for themselves but for all pilots at the Regional level are seeing the flying go away to other places. Some pilots can say that we as pilots have nothing to do with it and that it is only management that is to blame but I see this flying coming to us as a clear result of our pilot group voting yes for our concessionary pay package that gave our management the opportunity to be even cheaper. Our vote result was wrong when others are fighting for us. The pilot group was told from different sources that we did not have any leverage and immediately after the vote media was full of our leverage. It is sad that we as a pilot group did not understand the situation better and that we did not stand stronger but it is done and we should learn from it. Negotiations are about to start again and this time we should stand firm and demand what we have lost in years. There will be plenty of flying around as every Regional will have a hard time finding pilots and attrition is killing them.
To the Envoy guys, I am sorry.
Oh give it a rest. I was a no vote and even I say that it wasn't really a concession. It wasn't a large pay increase, which is what we should have had. But to apologize to envoy for what? For putting a hand full if plane in a base for AA? Eagle held strong, good for them. When we get to vote again we should not take anything less than a 10% raise either. But I'm not going to apologize for doing well and succeeding.
JustAMushroom is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 01:57 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: The right seat
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS View Post
To be completely thorough, SkyWest Airlines currently does 1,018 average daily departures for United, 491 for Delta, 89 for US Airways, 87 for American and 29 for Alaska. Exact numbers are unavailable for ExpressJet but if I had to guess...

SkyWest, Inc. - 2,100 United, 1,500 Delta, 160 American, 89 US Airways and 29 Alaska.

I don't believe Envoy has much to worry about at this point.
The XJT number for today are:
UA 1483 DL 758 AA 69 Total 2310
TheBlueBaron is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 04:06 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HermannGraf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CR7
Posts: 267
Default

Originally Posted by JustAMushroom View Post
Oh give it a rest. I was a no vote and even I say that it wasn't really a concession. It wasn't a large pay increase, which is what we should have had. But to apologize to envoy for what? For putting a hand full if plane in a base for AA? Eagle held strong, good for them. When we get to vote again we should not take anything less than a 10% raise either. But I'm not going to apologize for doing well and succeeding.
Get of the Mushroom, lol
I was a no vote because I understand the numbers and the numbers told me we did not in any way get a raise. Why did you vote no? Pay increase, C'mon, what pay increase? We took concessions, Do you mean that the pay raise was the "make you believe we giving you something" medical pay and more for the uniform and 3 minutes more while they raise the reserve to 76, did not re-negotiate the 1% cola and are paying the raise for the bro with savings in training due to new seat locks?


The company saved money on this last package. 1% cola that was not re-negotiated for the pilot group would have cost the company more than the symbolic bs we got.

The company played the game well outsmarted the pilot group and used SAPA as help.......

Last edited by HermannGraf; 03-05-2014 at 04:34 PM.
HermannGraf is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 04:17 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: DAL 757 FO
Posts: 192
Default

Herman what exactly are you sorry about? At no point in the process of Envoy or ouselves at Skywest voting on TA's did we ever make less or undercut them in any way. We got a whopping 4 AC, if we get an actual RFP are you going to commit sepuku in protest?





BTW I voted no.
Stinsat7 is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 04:26 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HermannGraf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CR7
Posts: 267
Default

Originally Posted by Stinsat7 View Post
Herman what exactly are you sorry about? At no point in the process of Envoy or ouselves at Skywest voting on TA's did we ever make less or undercut them in any way. We got a whopping 4 AC, if we get an actual RFP are you going to commit sepuku in protest?





BTW I voted no.
I am sorry that we as a pilot group did not support the other pilot groups that are fighting and that have said it is enough. I am sorry that we let us as a pilot group be fooled to think this was ok and passed the package on the first vote. Not even making an attempt to make it better and I am also sorry that we believed that at the moment we did not have any leverage. We have tons.
HermannGraf is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:18 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by JustAMushroom View Post
Oh give it a rest. I was a no vote and even I say that it wasn't really a concession. It wasn't a large pay increase, which is what we should have had. But to apologize to envoy for what? For putting a hand full if plane in a base for AA? Eagle held strong, good for them. When we get to vote again we should not take anything less than a 10% raise either. But I'm not going to apologize for doing well and succeeding.
You've made your choices. For those just coming online, or looking to, the message should be clear. You do not accept a job at a non-owned carrier, period. You take pride in yourself, and in your profession, and you take the job at a wholly owned. Our projections are that within 2 years AAG will be forced to merge Eagle/Envoy into AA as the only way to attract pilots to fly the smaller jets. By then, the other majors will have copied the flow-thru program at AA, and the recruiting tool AA will enjoy will no longer exist. At that point, they will have to make the E175 NG the entry level job at AA rather than a seperate subsidiary.

Good luck at your non-owned subcontracting company.
Mason32 is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 01:40 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by HermannGraf View Post
Get of the Mushroom, lol
I was a no vote because I understand the numbers and the numbers told me we did not in any way get a raise. Why did you vote no? Pay increase, C'mon, what pay increase? We took concessions, Do you mean that the pay raise was the "make you believe we giving you something" medical pay and more for the uniform and 3 minutes more while they raise the reserve to 76, did not re-negotiate the 1% cola and are paying the raise for the bro with savings in training due to new seat locks?


The company saved money on this last package. 1% cola that was not re-negotiated for the pilot group would have cost the company more than the symbolic bs we got.

The company played the game well outsmarted the pilot group and used SAPA as help.......
I voted no for those exact reasons. And also because we continue to improve on experience and efficiency and need to be compensated for it. And because they can find $2M+ for a hand full of management but give 3000 $2M. And because the 175 wasn't a raise. And especially especially because the cola is gone.

Yes, it should have been sent back. Yes SAPA should be reorganized. Do I feel bad for SkyWest growth? Not one bit. The only time We should balk at growth is if it was a direct result of shrinking a major.

I don't wish any bad on any regional pilot group. Even Pinnacle or PSA. And any growth we achieve from their loss should come with a preferential interview. But do I think we should stop growth for their benefit? No. And I'm not going to apologize for that.
JustAMushroom is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mmaviator
Regional
30
04-15-2013 01:49 PM
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
afterburn81
ExpressJet
33
09-17-2012 05:30 PM
JetBlast77
Regional
108
04-03-2012 08:00 AM
bgmann
Regional
82
07-27-2011 10:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices