Search

Notices

Rates of Pay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2020 | 06:36 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
Tom Brady makes more in a weekend than I'll make my entire life, so yea, we need more of those guys
If my supermodel wife had a net worth of 400m, I ain’t showing up to work at 5am for a 4 day trip either.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 01:11 PM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 336
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by SlipKid
Never fear, most of your fellow pilots here don't want to fix non pay related, sub industry standard things either.
It’s getting old dude. We get it, you have no faith in the pilot group.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 01:41 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
It’s getting old dude. We get it, you have no faith in the pilot group.
There is ample reason for that lack of faith, and I agree, it's beyond getting old. Heck, it was old 20 years ago.

You guys really need to start paying attention to what you're voting YES! on, or at least quit complaining when you get exactly what you voted for.

There are many reasons we are lagging the industry in just about every measurable way, and every one of them was the result of a YES! vote.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 02:44 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,656
Likes: 301
Default

Originally Posted by SlipKid
There is ample reason for that lack of faith, and I agree, it's beyond getting old. Heck, it was old 20 years ago.

You guys really need to start paying attention to what you're voting YES! on, or at least quit complaining when you get exactly what you voted for.

There are many reasons we are lagging the industry in just about every measurable way, and every one of them was the result of a YES! vote.

I knew what I was getting when I voted yes. And I was fine with it. I trusted the NC when they said there was no more juice left to squeeze. Compare us to the other LCC’s and we exceed in nearly every metric. Sure we need more gains on the big-3 and will vote accordingly if I don’t think the TA does enough.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 03:16 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
I knew what I was getting when I voted yes. And I was fine with it. I trusted the NC when they said there was no more juice left to squeeze. Compare us to the other LCC’s and we exceed in nearly every metric. Sure we need more gains on the big-3 and will vote accordingly if I don’t think the TA does enough.
At least you've admitted it.

Get used to sucking hind teat...... It ain't gonna change anytime soon.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 03:32 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default

Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.

Just. Vote. No.

You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.

Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 04:46 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Warhawg01
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.



Just. Vote. No.



You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.



Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.


Stop. I almost spit my beer out!
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 05:04 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Warhawg01
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.

Just. Vote. No.

You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.

Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
The ones that vote no ARE the ones that read them............

The yessies, unless they've ODed on the Koolaid, not so much.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 06:02 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,656
Likes: 301
Default

Originally Posted by Warhawg01
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.

Just. Vote. No.

You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.

Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.


Hahahahaha. I choked on my water.
Reply
Old 02-03-2020 | 06:03 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,656
Likes: 301
Default

Originally Posted by SlipKid
The ones that vote no ARE the ones that read them............

The yessies, unless they've ODed on the Koolaid, not so much.
I flew with quite a few who said they’ve never voted yes and never would. Also same people who said we’d never get a B-fund or 100% retro so I should quit and go elsewhere.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deltajuliet
Mesa Airlines
137
12-29-2021 02:14 PM
4myfamily
Endeavor Air
57
12-27-2016 06:08 PM
gzsg
Delta
10297
07-10-2015 01:42 PM
gzsg
Major
132
12-07-2013 08:27 PM
nerd2009
Major
73
09-26-2010 01:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices