Rates of Pay
02-03-2020, 06:36 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by flensr
Tom Brady makes more in a weekend than I'll make my entire life, so yea, we need more of those guys 
02-03-2020, 01:41 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,003
Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
It’s getting old dude. We get it, you have no faith in the pilot group.
You guys really need to start paying attention to what you're voting YES! on, or at least quit complaining when you get exactly what you voted for.
There are many reasons we are lagging the industry in just about every measurable way, and every one of them was the result of a YES! vote.
02-03-2020, 02:44 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,846
Originally Posted by SlipKid
There is ample reason for that lack of faith, and I agree, it's beyond getting old. Heck, it was old 20 years ago.
You guys really need to start paying attention to what you're voting YES! on, or at least quit complaining when you get exactly what you voted for.
There are many reasons we are lagging the industry in just about every measurable way, and every one of them was the result of a YES! vote.
You guys really need to start paying attention to what you're voting YES! on, or at least quit complaining when you get exactly what you voted for.
There are many reasons we are lagging the industry in just about every measurable way, and every one of them was the result of a YES! vote.
I knew what I was getting when I voted yes. And I was fine with it. I trusted the NC when they said there was no more juice left to squeeze. Compare us to the other LCC’s and we exceed in nearly every metric. Sure we need more gains on the big-3 and will vote accordingly if I don’t think the TA does enough.
02-03-2020, 03:16 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,003
Originally Posted by flyguy81
I knew what I was getting when I voted yes. And I was fine with it. I trusted the NC when they said there was no more juice left to squeeze. Compare us to the other LCC’s and we exceed in nearly every metric. Sure we need more gains on the big-3 and will vote accordingly if I don’t think the TA does enough.
Get used to sucking hind teat...... It ain't gonna change anytime soon.
02-03-2020, 03:32 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 139
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
02-03-2020, 04:46 PM
#47
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Originally Posted by Warhawg01
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Stop. I almost spit my beer out!
02-03-2020, 05:04 PM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,003
Originally Posted by Warhawg01
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
The yessies, unless they've ODed on the Koolaid, not so much.
02-03-2020, 06:02 PM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,846
Originally Posted by Warhawg01
Stop being reasonable. Don’t read or analyze any future TA.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Just. Vote. No.
You don’t even have to read it. Takes no time. And then you get to spend the life of that contract lording over everyone else. Some future issue crops up that is less than ideal? You get to say “sorry sucker, you voted Yes.” You get to put cool signature blocks in all your forum posts that read “SAIEW”. Seriously. Why bother educating yourself and making an informed decision when saying “No” is so damn easy and gets you *years* of tsk-ing tsk-ing all the saps.
Bonus: you never have to actually say why you voted No. Make up whatever unicorn fart reason you want regardless of the actual reality in a two-sided negotiation. Use the word “leverage” a lot, though. That will help.
Hahahahaha. I choked on my water.
02-03-2020, 06:03 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,846
Originally Posted by SlipKid
The ones that vote no ARE the ones that read them............
The yessies, unless they've ODed on the Koolaid, not so much.
The yessies, unless they've ODed on the Koolaid, not so much.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
