Rates of Pay
#32
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
we all do if you read the info the union puts out.
were going into negotiations and guys are bosting of how we make more tha we do, premium, and how it will all be gravy again. Just like how we negotiated last co tract at the going rate of 108tfp/month when guarantee is 89tfp.
come on guys dont sell yourself short already.
were going into negotiations and guys are bosting of how we make more tha we do, premium, and how it will all be gravy again. Just like how we negotiated last co tract at the going rate of 108tfp/month when guarantee is 89tfp.
come on guys dont sell yourself short already.
I don’t see why we can’t have the best rate and the best opportunity to more. I feel like the longer we see green bars on the schedule and struggle to make more like we used to guys who “run to ta1” won’t be as high as some think.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
We can't have the best rates because 85% of your co workers don't want them, and that's been proven time and again over the last quarter century.
#34
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
I’m confident that the 2000 we have added since the last contract will be a collective benefit to your concerns. We have been more educated than ever before with SWAPA sending out a of great information.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
#35
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 769
Likes: 77
I’m confident that the 2000 we have added since the last contract will be a collective benefit to your concerns. We have been more educated than ever before with SWAPA sending out a of great information.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
Last edited by tomgoodman; 02-02-2020 at 08:15 PM. Reason: Inappropriate language
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
I’m confident that the 2000 we have added since the last contract will be a collective benefit to your concerns. We have been more educated than ever before with SWAPA sending out a of great information.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
#37
I’m confident that the 2000 we have added since the last contract will be a collective benefit to your concerns. We have been more educated than ever before with SWAPA sending out a of great information.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
I actually agree with this 100%.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#38
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
I’m confident that the 2000 we have added since the last contract will be a collective benefit to your concerns. We have been more educated than ever before with SWAPA sending out a of great information.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
Do we need better rates? Yes, but we don’t need the highest rates to make most happy. We need to fix lots of other things like disability/health insurance, chopped up trips and reserve Manning. Technology and language to reduce JA’s and unscheduled overnights along with a host over other things that aren’t pay rate related. My point is if we sign our Ta before the others and have “caught up” or pass, but then they sign and go +5% over us will people be angry here? Yes, but if we get other wins I don’t see a problem.
I agree all the other stuff is more important than top paid. But I’m constantly told we are the best 737 pilots in the world. Then pay us like we are! Don’t forget to include the snap up clause. Delta, United or American pay +1!
#39
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Sometimes the best aren’t paid the most. There needs to be Tom Brady’s in the world.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



