![]() |
Originally Posted by Proximity
(Post 3948982)
Southwest is remaking itself into a legacy.
Why would you not want to go to legacy, assuming one had a domicile where you live? We are transforming to compete with a legacy, but we will not be a legacy in the true sense of the word. I can appreciate you asking the question, but assuming you’re SWA, why haven’t you gone to a legacy? |
Originally Posted by Wildturkey
(Post 3948993)
Like many, when given a sneak peek of what we can do with our schedules and pay, I too gave up on any desire to go to a legacy. Not to mention, despite the anecdotal APC complaining, the average work experience is still very positive.
We are transforming to compete with a legacy, but we will not be a legacy in the true sense of the word. I can appreciate you asking the question, but assuming you’re SWA, why haven’t you gone to a legacy? That said, If I were 15 or so years younger, I'd be applying to Delta. Let's not fool ourselves. This place is great, but it's seldom been the first choice among job seekers. Heck, up until a decade ago people paid for an $8000 type rating to apply here (unless they flew the 737 at another airline) and that's not something people do if they're able to be hired by any other reputable airline that DOESN'T have such a requirement. |
Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
(Post 3948999)
Because we live in a seniority ecosystem. Once you've been somewhere for a few years you lose more than you gain by making a lateral move. Trust me, I've made that unfortunate choice more than once.
That said, If I were 15 or so years younger, I'd be applying to Delta. Let's not fool ourselves. This place is great, but it's seldom been the first choice among job seekers. Heck, up until a decade ago people paid for an $8000 type rating to apply here (unless they flew the 737 at another airline) and that's not something people do if they're able to be hired by any other reputable airline that DOESN'T have such a requirement. The guy who posted said he doesn’t want to go to a legacy, and I’m offering a viewpoint that says that’s ok. |
Originally Posted by Mozam
(Post 3948727)
Very true. SWA lives and preaches “ live by the golden rule “
What a crock of… |
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 3948947)
Age 43
14,5000 total 9,000 TPIC 4 year degree (albeit online and later in life) No apps out anywhere else. I live in a SWA base and have commuted all of my career and am tired of it (but I’m not moving!). No desire to go to a legacy. SWA meets all my career reqs. Good luck to all! Remember, this career owes you nothing. |
Originally Posted by Wildturkey
(Post 3948993)
I can appreciate you asking the question, but assuming you’re SWA, why haven’t you gone to a legacy?
Delta has just as much schedule flexibility as Southwest. Southwest has the advantage of more trips to trade/domicile flexibility, Delta has the ability to drop trips using blue-slip or IVD, long call reserve, and more varied mix of flying. While you can fly the FAR limits at Southwest and beat any legacy pilot's W2, for you average line holder who picks up open time at either income will be similar. For those that claim they only want to fly the 737, you'll advance in your seat faster at Delta as those above you bid off to bigger equipment. I seriously looked at it twice. Southwest hired me first so my seniority started growing here and as time advances it makes less and less sense to leave. Also, the first time around was during a time when hiring was competitive and advancement was slow. I was looking at a good year of commuting to a junior base to cover three airports. Unfortunately I drive to work at Southwest and while Delta would be a very easy commute, by a very small amount it didn't make sense for me. However, if I could go back I would have taken VSP ($500k would have tipped the scales) and would be close to holding 330B in DTW (more senior than the left seat at Delta). As mentioned above, I'm approaching ten years here now and in the left seat so leaving now would never make sense. Whenever someone says "I would never want to work for United/Delta/America {insert some coping rationalization}" or "I would never work for a legacy" my spidey sense goes off. All are good places to work (well I think AA ranks below SWA/UA/DL), so everyone should pick the one that works best for their situation. I would also never believe a pilot that works for company A that tells you company A is the best. Most pilots want to rationalize they made the right choice. |
Originally Posted by Proximity
(Post 3949097)
Good question.
Delta has just as much schedule flexibility as Southwest. Southwest has the advantage of more trips to trade/domicile flexibility, Delta has the ability to drop trips using blue-slip or IVD, long call reserve, and more varied mix of flying. While you can fly the FAR limits at Southwest and beat any legacy pilot's W2, for you average line holder who picks up open time at either income will be similar. For those that claim they only want to fly the 737, you'll advance in your seat faster at Delta as those above you bid off to bigger equipment. I seriously looked at it twice. Southwest hired me first so my seniority started growing here and as time advances it makes less and less sense to leave. Also, the first time around was during a time when hiring was competitive and advancement was slow. I was looking at a good year of commuting to a junior base to cover three airports. Unfortunately I drive to work at Southwest and while Delta would be a very easy commute, by a very small amount it didn't make sense for me. However, if I could go back I would have taken VSP ($500k would have tipped the scales) and would be close to holding 330B in DTW (more senior than the left seat at Delta). As mentioned above, I'm approaching ten years here now and in the left seat so leaving now would never make sense. Whenever someone says "I would never want to work for United/Delta/America {insert some coping rationalization}" or "I would never work for a legacy" my spidey sense goes off. All are good places to work (well I think AA ranks below SWA/UA/DL), so everyone should pick the one that works best for their situation. I would also never believe a pilot that works for company A that tells you company A is the best. Most pilots want to rationalize they made the right choice. I too don’t like when pilots say I would never work at xyz airline for usually some reason that isn’t grounded in reality. My spidey sense went off at your original question, because I was hoping it wasn’t another “I’m at this airline but you shouldn’t come here” post. All are good places to work, and I would want someone to make a choice that works for them, not because the Internet thinks xyz is better. |
Agree, all are within a standard deviation of the other as far as career expectations with the obvious exception of SW only flying one type. I regularly talk to my friends flying for other places and although some of the topics change, there is general agreement that they all are pretty much the same. I think in our seniority system, there is a tendency to justify your decision to be locked into a company for life. Most of us had very little control over how it all went down. The industry will go through its cycles and carriers will have good stretches and bad. It's all about riding out the down times and enjoying the good times.
If you ever want a good chuckle, head over to some of the other forums and you will see what I mean. Everyone either thinks their company has it all figured out and are moments away from ruling the planet or it is all doom and gloom and a BK is just around the corner. Usually neither are true. Over the long term, airlines have struggled to stay afloat despite there being some real boom times. More money has been lost than made hauling people from place to place. I like to think we are finally living in a time where that has changed for good, but only time will tell. |
Originally Posted by e6bpilot
(Post 3949113)
Agree, all are within a standard deviation of the other as far as career expectations with the obvious exception of SW only flying one type. I regularly talk to my friends flying for other places and although some of the topics change, there is general agreement that they all are pretty much the same. I think in our seniority system, there is a tendency to justify your decision to be locked into a company for life. Most of us had very little control over how it all went down. The industry will go through its cycles and carriers will have good stretches and bad. It's all about riding out the down times and enjoying the good times.
If you ever want a good chuckle, head over to some of the other forums and you will see what I mean. Everyone either thinks their company has it all figured out and are moments away from ruling the planet or it is all doom and gloom and a BK is just around the corner. Usually neither are true. Over the long term, airlines have struggled to stay afloat despite there being some real boom times. More money has been lost than made hauling people from place to place. I like to think we are finally living in a time where that has changed for good, but only time will tell. |
Originally Posted by Proximity
(Post 3949097)
Good question.
Delta has just as much schedule flexibility as Southwest. Southwest has the advantage of more trips to trade/domicile flexibility, Delta has the ability to drop trips using blue-slip or IVD, long call reserve, and more varied mix of flying. While you can fly the FAR limits at Southwest and beat any legacy pilot's W2, for you average line holder who picks up open time at either income will be similar. For those that claim they only want to fly the 737, you'll advance in your seat faster at Delta as those above you bid off to bigger equipment. I seriously looked at it twice. Southwest hired me first so my seniority started growing here and as time advances it makes less and less sense to leave. Also, the first time around was during a time when hiring was competitive and advancement was slow. I was looking at a good year of commuting to a junior base to cover three airports. Unfortunately I drive to work at Southwest and while Delta would be a very easy commute, by a very small amount it didn't make sense for me. However, if I could go back I would have taken VSP ($500k would have tipped the scales) and would be close to holding 330B in DTW (more senior than the left seat at Delta). As mentioned above, I'm approaching ten years here now and in the left seat so leaving now would never make sense. Whenever someone says "I would never want to work for United/Delta/America {insert some coping rationalization}" or "I would never work for a legacy" my spidey sense goes off. All are good places to work (well I think AA ranks below SWA/UA/DL), so everyone should pick the one that works best for their situation. I would also never believe a pilot that works for company A that tells you company A is the best. Most pilots want to rationalize they made the right choice. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands