Search

Notices

March Vacancy Bid Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2026 | 03:26 PM
  #141  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 9
Likes: 8
Default

SWAPA’s last email about DEN.

oof
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 03:41 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot889
SWAPA’s last email about DEN.

oof
No idea what’s going on with this place. As long as the Sr DEN guys are out, the likelihood of anyone else getting back home to a base out West soon is slim.
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 04:35 PM
  #143  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 39
Likes: 17
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
No idea what’s going on with this place. As long as the Sr DEN guys are out, the likelihood of anyone else getting back home to a base out West soon is slim.
There were no senior pilots displaced from DEN. By definition, those displaced from DEN were junior.

Also not really accurate for FOs. Assuming there are even half as many upgrades and new hires as the company claims, FOs shouldn’t have a problem getting into any base besides DEN or ATL
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 05:13 PM
  #144  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 486
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot889
SWAPA’s last email about DEN.

oof
yeah, not great bedside manner by SWAPA. Just finally ripped the band aid off i guess.
DEN will not be growing back to it's previous size and those displaced will be out for years even though we are hiring. Oh and by the way you can take a paid move.

Meanwhile were going up to 26 BOD members. Its ok though because we'll make sure full time e trip pull guys will be able to move bases this summer to go cash in on premium then go back to trip pull in the fall.

Im thinking SWAPA is going to get a shake up soon.
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 05:17 PM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Default

Originally Posted by DAnnunzio
There were no senior pilots displaced from DEN. By definition, those displaced from DEN were junior.

Also not really accurate for FOs. Assuming there are even half as many upgrades and new hires as the company claims, FOs shouldn’t have a problem getting into any base besides DEN or ATL
Junior in base, senior relative to everyone else displaced (except ATL guys). Most Jr CA in DEN is a Oct '15 hire, making DEN the 2nd most Sr base behind ATL (most Jr CA in the company was awarded upgrade on this bid - Jan '18 hire - 1511 pilots Jr to the DEN CA plug). Most Jr. DEN FO is now an April '23 hire making DEN the most Sr FO base in the company (there's 1730 FO's junior to the plug).

Takes 48% system seniority just to hold DEN as CA or 85% as a FO. With SWAPA's email today saying it could take years to get back to DEN, the only real way back into a base out west as a FO are people willing to commute to upgrade (how many are really going to sign up to do a transcon commute to sit rsv?) or growth (which is only happening in AUS). As a CA - it's retirements, which are negligible when spread throughout 13 bases.

Company is telling new hires and interviewees they can hold DEN and bases out west shortly out of training. It could take years....especially since DRR doesn't apply to secondary vacancies (union needs to fix this....like yesterday). New hires went to BWI and MCO....likely to continue as people hired the last 2 years work their way back west.

They could unf*%& this pretty easily if they wanted to....
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 06:30 PM
  #146  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 771
Likes: 78
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Junior in base, senior relative to everyone else displaced (except ATL guys). Most Jr CA in DEN is a Oct '15 hire, making DEN the 2nd most Sr base behind ATL (most Jr CA in the company was awarded upgrade on this bid - Jan '18 hire - 1511 pilots Jr to the DEN CA plug). Most Jr. DEN FO is now an April '23 hire making DEN the most Sr FO base in the company (there's 1730 FO's junior to the plug).

Takes 48% system seniority just to hold DEN as CA or 85% as a FO. With SWAPA's email today saying it could take years to get back to DEN, the only real way back into a base out west as a FO are people willing to commute to upgrade (how many are really going to sign up to do a transcon commute to sit rsv?) or growth (which is only happening in AUS). As a CA - it's retirements, which are negligible when spread throughout 13 bases.

Company is telling new hires and interviewees they can hold DEN and bases out west shortly out of training. It could take years....especially since DRR doesn't apply to secondary vacancies (union needs to fix this....like yesterday). New hires went to BWI and MCO....likely to continue as people hired the last 2 years work their way back west.

They could unf*%& this pretty easily if they wanted to....
Commuting to captain after 6 or 8 years is better than having to wait for 10-12 years for first available. I know that doesn't make you feel a whole lot better, but just saying try to keep that in perspective and maybe it won't suck quite as bad.

In the meantime, it would be nice if the company would build some lines that start with deadheads for a while and at least split the pain between labor and management.

It would beat paying for moves if a bunch of guys took advantage of them.
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 06:40 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Default

Originally Posted by MudhammedCJ
Commuting to captain after 6 or 8 years is better than having to wait for 10-12 years for first available. I know that doesn't make you feel a whole lot better, but just saying try to keep that in perspective and maybe it won't suck quite as bad.

In the meantime, it would be nice if the company would build some lines that start with deadheads for a while and at least split the pain between labor and management.

It would beat paying for moves if a bunch of guys took advantage of them.
Depends if you value QOL. A 5-6 hr commute long term to cross 3 time zones is pretty awful if you’ve never done it. Even worse to commute to sit reserve.

The only thing that isn’t awful is the pay raise and having sick time pay out at CA pay.

Agree on DHD lines. They should also eat the cost of hotels..with how much $ this place wastes daily…hotels for displaced pilots is a rounding error. I’d also like to see the union get all vacancies subject to DRR.
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 06:56 PM
  #148  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 486
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Depends if you value QOL. A 5-6 hr commute long term to cross 3 time zones is pretty awful if you’ve never done it. Even worse to commute to sit reserve.

The only thing that isn’t awful is the pay raise and having sick time pay out at CA pay.

Agree on DHD lines. They should also eat the cost of hotels..with how much $ this place wastes daily…hotels for displaced pilots is a rounding error. I’d also like to see the union get all vacancies subject to DRR.
ever wonder if the union said that because they plan to sell out scope, but now they can say they saved a base?
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 08:19 PM
  #149  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 584
Likes: 72
Default

I am extremely disappointed in our company and even more so our Union. The Union truly does not care much about the displacements. I voiced my concerns to my reps in a well thought out email and all I got was “thanks for the feedback”. No feedback on changes I suggested we look at pursuing or even the courtesy of giving feedback to me and why my suggestions would not be a good idea. And then SWAPA’s email came out today that said “read our resources page” (which does not do anything to really help anyone) and “you can take a paid move” which is a roundabout way of saying that commuting is a choice. Our Union has lost touch with the people they serve.
Reply
Old 01-27-2026 | 09:17 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
ever wonder if the union said that because they plan to sell out scope, but now they can say they saved a base?
Wouldn’t a change to Section 1 have to go to a membership vote? I’d think something that big that affects everyone shouldn’t be decided by 25 people.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
j3cub
Allegiant
6378
12-20-2020 08:01 AM
C-17 Driver
United
47
07-18-2014 07:08 PM
Jumbo Pilot
Cargo
299
05-08-2013 07:06 AM
cgull
United
127
04-05-2013 03:43 AM
pilot141
Cargo
74
09-25-2007 02:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices