Search
Notices

AT/SWA SLI Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2011, 05:59 PM
  #61  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,707
Default

Originally Posted by ftrplt18e View Post
And I can guarantee one thing....Gary Kelly doesn't want SWA turning into a USAir.
Then he better pay up. Wayyyy up.

While you guys may not want to hear it, I'm thinking it's the Airtran guys holding most of the cards, not SWA folks. Remember, Southwest (and Gary Kelly) who wants Airtran, not the other way around.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 06:09 PM
  #62  
Don't want to participate
 
LuvJockey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: 737 Left Seat
Posts: 1,016
Default

Gentlemen, this will go nowhere until both parties know what is actually in the deal. At that point, our Delta friends will be free to criticize it all they want to.

I am sure that they have the best interests of both parties at heart. What they really fear is having to explain to their friends and neighbors in PeachTree city that they have lower pay and worse work rules than the AirTran guy that just bought the house across the street. Hell, the AirTran guy might even act like he is in charge of the hotel van.

I can't wait to hear the cries for justice from the same Delta guys who called AirTran a junk airline only 6 months ago.

With that, I'm done...for now. Peace out.
LuvJockey is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 06:21 PM
  #63  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey View Post
Gentlemen, this will go nowhere until both parties know what is actually in the deal. At that point, our Delta friends will be free to criticize it all they want to.

I am sure that they have the best interests of both parties at heart. What they really fear is having to explain to their friends and neighbors in PeachTree city that they have lower pay and worse work rules than the AirTran guy that just bought the house across the street. Hell, the AirTran guy might even act like he is in charge of the hotel van.

I can't wait to hear the cries for justice from the same Delta guys who called AirTran a junk airline only 6 months ago.

With that, I'm done...for now. Peace out.
I'm actually looking forward to our green tailed neighbors getting a big pay raise. More pressure on mother DL to pay up.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 06:38 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
I'm actually looking forward to our green tailed neighbors getting a big pay raise. More pressure on mother DL to pay up.
^^^^^ Yup. This only helps our cause. More power to the Trannies.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 06:40 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
It seems you have a tough time understanding what relative seniority is. No one loses seniority and upgrade time... not doing relative in this merger would be stealing seniority and upgrade time.
Sadly that's not true either. Imagine if you guys acquired GoJet and they got relative seniority. Sweet for them because they're all 27 years old! In 15 years they'll all own the top seniority of the airline!

That's similar to the difference in demographics between SWA and AT. There is no way a rational SWA pilot would vote to give relative seniority or DOH to a pilot group that is so much younger. It's a major impediment to current SWAPA pilots future careers.

If you guys were all 8 years older, you'd have an argument there.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 06:40 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey View Post
I am sure that they have the best interests of both parties at heart. What they really fear is having to explain to their friends and neighbors in PeachTree city that they have lower pay and worse work rules than the AirTran guy that just bought the house across the street. Hell, the AirTran guy might even act like he is in charge of the hotel van.

I can't wait to hear the cries for justice from the same Delta guys who called AirTran a junk airline only 6 months ago.
I can't wait to hear all of the SWA guys guffawing when the lists are integrated. Then, it'll be the SWA guys bad-mouthing the Trannies. That's good theater. Getting the popcorn ready.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 07:00 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Hopefully this post is overcome by events but...

My perfect vision of the future: I hope SWA/SWAPA/AT is able to complete this transaction with a negotiated agreement. That means getting an agreeable deal we can all vote yes to within the next month or two. Then the company completes making us a single operating entity and we all go home happy and better off (I realize that we're airline pilots and some of us will be unhappy no matter what---Every Thursday?)

Maybe some of these rumors of growth are true and we all walk away big winners no matter what, but we really won't know until the jets are on the ramp. My standard is hope for the best and keep a hand over your nuts.

I understand that no one wants their cheese moved. I don't want AT's cheese. I have a very hard time believing that SWAPA pilots are salivating over an ATL base. My personal opinion is any of our commuters will happily continue to commute to where ever as long as their long term system seniority isn't impacted. I live way out west so I may be wrong, but I can't remember flying with a single guy who lives in Georgia (and I used to live there so I might remember).

Just realize that SWAPA pilots have to see gain or status quo for this deal to happen via negotiation. From our perspective, over the length of our careers, DOH is not close to status quo, it is a near term seniority boost and a long term seniority block for SWAPA pilots.

Don't let the extremists on either side of the aisle take control of the arguments. There is a way to make this happen and HARM no one. Some will be bigger winners (and we don't know who they are yet) but there is a way.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 07:01 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

As I hit "send" the e-mail arrived on my phone announcing an Agreement in Principal.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 07:26 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default

July 16, 2011


Fellow Pilots,

This afternoon, the AirTran Merger Committee (MC) reached an agreement-in-principle with SWAPA and Southwest Airlines on a seniority list integration and transition agreement...


No details yet.

Last edited by MatthewAMEL; 07-16-2011 at 07:38 PM.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 07-16-2011, 09:18 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine View Post
I have a very hard time believing that SWAPA pilots are salivating over an ATL base. My personal opinion is any of our commuters will happily continue to commute to where ever as long as their long term system seniority isn't impacted. I live way out west so I may be wrong, but I can't remember flying with a single guy who lives in Georgia...
Are you implying that if SWA takes away...errr... TOOK away the growth and captain seats that Air Tran had coming with their airplane orders, the SWA guys won't bid captain in Atlanta? As for fences, are you going to fence the growth that Air Tran would have had in MKE, BWI, etc?

From the USAir merger (and I think others too):

"...merger representatives should attempt to match equities of various methods of integrattion until a fair and equitable agreement is reached, keeping in mind the following goals, in no particular order:
a. Preserve jobs
b. Avoid windfalls to either group at the expense of the other.
c. Maintain or improve pre-merger pay and standard of living.
d. Maintain or improve pre-merger pilot status.
e. Minimize detrimental changes to career expectations."

A percentage merger maintains all of those except for the Air Tran guys get hit on e, because their upgrades and hiring have stopped since the announcement. An arbitrated award might give them some offset to that.

Anything that ultimately downgrades Air Tran pilots and upgrades SWA pilots(i.e. any kind of staple) violates b, d, and e.

In a negotiated integration, you could have financial carrots to offset some level of stapling (for Air Tran), or not stapling (for SWA).

Last edited by FAULTPUSH; 07-16-2011 at 09:50 PM.
FAULTPUSH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices