Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Airtran/Southwest AIP in a nutshell >

Airtran/Southwest AIP in a nutshell

Search
Notices

Airtran/Southwest AIP in a nutshell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2011, 12:42 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
As I undersand it, there is no Guadalupe Holdings. It was only in existence for the 5'minutes it took to sign the papers.

Nu
After the merger closes, AirTran will be merged into a new limited liability company set up as a Texas company, LLC Sub, which will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Southwest.
shoelu is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 12:53 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDeere View Post
Shoe' you'll have to address those questions to your MC. I am jet the reporter. Maybe you're drunk. I didn't insinuate anything. Read it again.
I wish I was drunk so I would have an easier time believing this. What exactly was I supposed to take away from: "The MC was packing up to leave when the SWAPA guys showed up with a six pack and said, in effect, let's talk." Do you really and truly believe that SWA was letting SWAPA broker a $3 BILLION deal that they would have to write the check for? I have talked on several occasions with my reps. They, unlike yours, are incredibly tight lipped about any specific negotiations. I guess I will just have to rely on your accounts as to what the truth truly is.
shoelu is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 12:57 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: DC9 CA
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
I wish I was drunk so I would have an easier time believing this. What exactly was I supposed to take away from: "The MC was packing up to leave when the SWAPA guys showed up with a six pack and said, in effect, let's talk." Do you really and truly believe that SWA was letting SWAPA broker a $3 BILLION deal that they would have to write the check for? I have talked on several occasions with my reps. They, unlike yours, are incredibly tight lipped about any specific negotiations. I guess I will just have to rely on your accounts as to what the truth truly is.
If I had pulled off such a coup, I'd be tight lipped too.
JohnDeere is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 01:18 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Unfortunately, that is, in essence, what happened.

The MEC did authorize the MC to resume talks on a more casual basis, but the "starting point" of the negotiations was misunderstood. . . . MEC believed they were authorizing them to start from point previous to GK's proposal, MC understood begin from GK proposal.

Hence the misfire (AIP). It was basically a miscommunication, not rogue negotiators, nor were they chloroformed.

AirTran pilots are not the enemy. ALPA is not the antichrist, and SWAPA is certainly no angel. Both pilot groups need to remember that they're going to have to work together (regardless of some SWA pilots' fantasies).
MaxPowers is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 01:27 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDeere View Post
If I had pulled off such a coup, I'd be tight lipped too.
What coup are you referring to? Did I miss something? Do we have an agreement that I didn't hear about? If the MC was truly negotiating in the dark with SWA (not SWAPA, a fact that seems to be falling on deaf ears) did they really think that this terrible deal that they had to keep a secret, would ever get past the MEC? Are the MC members not AT ALPA? Please inform me why they would ever broker this secret deal if it was such a bad idea and had no chance of passing the MEC or membership.
shoelu is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 01:40 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDeere View Post
Andy, go do some more homework. SL9 is the SW agreement. As to who called whom, I wasn't invited so I wouldn't know. Seems you've got your own house to get in order.
Do some homework? What is it that I got wrong - I was merely dissecting your (completely implausible) story.

Get my own house in order? Huh? My house is in order. Thanks to age 65, I've been on unpaid 'leave' (yeah, we'll call it leave; so much nicer than furlough) and have been hanging around the house for a while now. Heck, I've even been using our pool water to water the landscaping, allowing me to get our pool's chemical balance in perfect order this summer. When we moved in last fall, the calcium hardness and CYA levels were through the roof and it looked like I'd need to drain the entire pool. Instead, I was able to recycle the old pool water on our landscaping. Now my calcium hardness is below 450 and my cyanuric acid level is 65. Sweet!
I've been keeping the entire inside of our house clean; I do the dishes, mop the floors, etc. I've even steam cleaned the carpets several times over the last year. I'm not allowed to do the laundry though; my wife doesn't let me.
I've changed the oil, transmission fluid, transmission filter, and antifreeze on both cars. I've even got a car detailing kit where I've spent a couple of days polishing both cars.
I've put tint on some of our home windows to reduce the heat from the sun. It's darned hot here in Tucson.
Yes, I'd say my house is in order. Even my wife, a clean freak, agrees with me.


If AAI's MC was really missing for that long, it's too bad that someone at AAIALPA dodn't have the good sense to get each AAI MC member's picture on the back of milk cartons. Maybe they would've been found before they agreed on SL9. You might want to suggest that at your next AAIALPA meeting - call it Operation Milk Carton.
Andy is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 01:49 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowers View Post
Unfortunately, that is, in essence, what happened.

The MEC did authorize the MC to resume talks on a more casual basis, but the "starting point" of the negotiations was misunderstood. . . . MEC believed they were authorizing them to start from point previous to GK's proposal, MC understood begin from GK proposal.

Hence the misfire (AIP). It was basically a miscommunication, not rogue negotiators, nor were they chloroformed.

AirTran pilots are not the enemy. ALPA is not the antichrist, and SWAPA is certainly no angel. Both pilot groups need to remember that they're going to have to work together (regardless of some SWA pilots' fantasies).
It just seems that it is incredibly unlikely that this deal was brokered over several days and the MEC was never brought up to speed as to what was being agreed to. Maybe I am wrong and it is completely plausible and I am missing something along the way, it certainly wouldn't be the first time.

I wholeheartedly agree that AT pilots are not the enemy and we very well need to work together some day. My discontent is placed solely on the shoulders of Management for choosing to travel down a road that is so clearly marked with land mines. That exasperation sometimes spills over to my posts and has unintended consequences for which I apologize.
shoelu is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 02:17 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OscartheGrouch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B737/Capt
Posts: 998
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Don't worry, it wasn't personal. They do that to everyone.
News flash for you DAL folks. As far as cutting people off while taxiing goes it is not exclusive to SWA. Cut off personally by a DAL 767 in PBI after both ground and tower asked him to hold short for little 'ol SWA (me).

If an AT plane was cut off I am sure it was an accident.

The Oscar

Last edited by OscartheGrouch; 08-29-2011 at 02:29 PM.
OscartheGrouch is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 02:48 PM
  #49  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: DC9 CA
Posts: 99
Default

If an AT plane was cut off I am sure it was an accident.
Probably so.

I've never screwed up----as far as you know.
JohnDeere is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 02:55 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: DC9 CA
Posts: 99
Default

This is not a criticism, just an observation. After the last few weeks of "discussion" re: AIP, I am starting to understand that part of the SW mystique lies in disinformation (i.e., only tell the pilots what they want to hear.) Maybe that's the way! What we're doing is clearly giving the wrong impression.

But make no mistake; your MC (maybe even management) has yet to demonstrate any real level of respect to the AT pilot group. Lip service only. I am hopeful that this is just posturing.

The bottom line, your MC aimed way too high and now have to go back to work----something that was clearly never envisioned based on recent developments. Talk to your MC. It might prove interesting.
JohnDeere is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HuronIP
Major
7
09-09-2009 08:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices