Search
Notices

Southwest hiring info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2013, 05:48 PM
  #51  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

just an observation but we departed "Southwest Hiring Info" airspace about 20 posts ago on this thread
satpak77 is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 10:05 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
XtremeF150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: M88B
Posts: 1,179
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
I'm keeping up just fine. You quoted a poster which stated SWA has lower CASM. You stated that some of those higher costs were associated with transiting Russian and Norwegian airspace and landing fees in Tokyo. I then reiterated that SWA was not contemplating flights to Europe or Japan and therefore will not be experiemcing those costs associated with the markets you mentioned.

Once again I'll say it slowly. Southwest Is Not Talking About Doing Long Haul Flying To Europe Or Asia, they do not have an airplane type to accomplish that mission! The costs associated with S.A. are much lower and will still lead to lower CASM costs at SWA.
Yeah I think your missing the big picture here. No one said SWA is paying or will pay these same fees. They referenced the chart and said those carriers with much higher CASM are related to paying much higher fees than SWA currently endures in its domestic flights.

I don't know how much the airlines get hit with these fees but I do know that nonrevving isn't free outside the US and can vary greatly with the fees incurred to the employee on those international legs.
XtremeF150 is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 10:07 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
XtremeF150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: M88B
Posts: 1,179
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
just an observation but we departed "Southwest Hiring Info" airspace about 20 posts ago on this thread
I thought several posters cleared that up for us. "No hiring planned in 2013" Same for DAL I think. Join the club guys.
XtremeF150 is offline  
Old 03-16-2013, 06:05 PM
  #54  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
Again, my thoughts are Midway-Cancun, Islip-Dom Rep, maybe just seasonal service, to "get their feet wet" on international ops. There is no question you couldn't fill seats on those routes. Both origination cities offer huge potential pools of fliers and both destinations are hugely popular due to a mix of tourism (Chicago is cold in winter lets go to Cancun) and family/cultural ties (Dom Rep/NYC).
So who is going to pay CBP begin operating at those two airports? Last time I checked, neither Midway, nor Islip were "International" airports, ie no customs/immigration, and Cancun and the DomRep were not pre clearance stations.

Not picking on you really. SWA is completely capable of doing near international. I think that what is annoying people is the near cavalier attitude some SWA'ers have about doing it. It's a whole other ball game with a steep learning curve, hence the purchase of AAI, who had the experience and knowledge base to do it.

Besides, if people really wanted to fly ultra cheap across the pond, Ryan Air would already be doing it. That guy out southwests even Southwest in cheapness. (Or People Express, Laker Air, or the many others who tried doing it cheap would still be around.)
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 03-16-2013, 07:15 PM
  #55  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
So who is going to pay CBP begin operating at those two airports? Last time I checked, neither Midway, nor Islip were "International" airports, ie no customs/immigration, and Cancun and the DomRep were not pre clearance stations.

Not picking on you really. SWA is completely capable of doing near international. I think that what is annoying people is the near cavalier attitude some SWA'ers have about doing it. It's a whole other ball game with a steep learning curve, hence the purchase of AAI, who had the experience and knowledge base to do it.

Besides, if people really wanted to fly ultra cheap across the pond, Ryan Air would already be doing it. That guy out southwests even Southwest in cheapness. (Or People Express, Laker Air, or the many others who tried doing it cheap would still be around.)
indeed, presently correct. However never say never. Especially in the name of "more jobs, more choices" for air commerce. Last time I checked, both parties were concerned about our economy.

Good luck to SWA and I see a great future ahead for their great company
satpak77 is offline  
Old 03-16-2013, 09:07 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
XtremeF150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: M88B
Posts: 1,179
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
indeed, presently correct. However never say never. Especially in the name of "more jobs, more choices" for air commerce. Last time I checked, both parties were concerned about our economy.

Good luck to SWA and I see a great future ahead for their great company
They indeed have a great future but count me in for the doubters on the trans atlantic or pacific flying. They will definately do some LA and island flying but there would be blood shed on international routes. That isn't just UAL, AA, and DAL fighting for those routes. It is a new fierce competitor that has better fuel hedges than SWA could ever touch. Right now the legacies are changing to survival mode out over the open water. I just hope there is an N number on the tail of those a/c crossing the atlantic in the next decade.
XtremeF150 is offline  
Old 03-17-2013, 06:10 AM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Default Swa hiring

I would agree with those that stated we will not be hiring any time in the near future.

We currently have to absorb the rest of the 1700 pilots we acquired while not bringing on 88 of their airplanes. This begs the question, "What is our planned crew total post transition?"

Great question. Currently we will be averaging a plus 10 pilot per month ratio on the swa side until at least post 2015. This is while airplanes are going to DAL.

I seriously doubt SWA will make the transition timeline on the staffing. Expect a side letter for relief. I'm also betting that we'll lose some pilots at the bottom of the seniority list who will see greener pastures elsewhere. However, I would only put that number at about 2% of 7500.

Most of the rumors I hear claim we're currently overstaffed by 400 and that's on the captain side. The other rumor is that all hiring has ceased, all upgrades have ceased and it's all about bringing air tran guys over here at about 48 a month. Not a very efficient manning model but the other rumor is that the over staffing on the captain side is to keep the senior RSW FO's happy in deference to the SLI by offering as many upgrades as possible before the 2015 transition date. But, it looks like those upgrade opportunities might now be gone.

My take on all this is that you won't see any new hiring at SWA for at least two years. But what the hell do I know. I'm just a dumb pilot.

Bush Pilot is offline  
Old 03-17-2013, 07:27 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by Bush Pilot View Post
Most of the rumors I hear claim we're currently overstaffed by 400 and that's on the captain side. The other rumor is that all hiring has ceased, all upgrades have ceased and it's all about bringing air tran guys over here at about 48 a month.
The 400 number you are hearing is for Jan-Feb every year. The schedule is reduced in those months. There is at least one upgrade class of 24 each month.



(Disclaimer: The opinion is my own, and not that of Southwest Airlines Officers, Directors, or Employees.)
tr4a is offline  
Old 03-17-2013, 07:42 AM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Default tr4a

No mystery with that call sign.

There is at least one upgrade class of 24 each month.
I've heard that from swapa as well but the training center has been telling recurrent classes NO UPGRADES.

Which one is it? And, if we're already overstaffed then why more captains?
Bush Pilot is offline  
Old 03-17-2013, 09:39 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
So who is going to pay CBP begin operating at those two airports? Last time I checked, neither Midway, nor Islip were "International" airports, ie no customs/immigration, and Cancun and the DomRep were not pre clearance stations.

Not picking on you really. SWA is completely capable of doing near international. I think that what is annoying people is the near cavalier attitude some SWA'ers have about doing it. It's a whole other ball game with a steep learning curve, hence the purchase of AAI, who had the experience and knowledge base to do it.

Besides, if people really wanted to fly ultra cheap across the pond, Ryan Air would already be doing it. That guy out southwests even Southwest in cheapness. (Or People Express, Laker Air, or the many others who tried doing it cheap would still be around.)
There are other issues that impact some of the cost advantages SW has on domestic flights. You have to make a positive bag match. The aircraft can't be quick turned because you have to wait for customs to release the aircraft before you can start the turn process. The crews even if staying with the aircraft will have get off with all luggage, clear immigration, customs and then back through security to reboard. The boarding process itself is slow and chaotic to many of these destinations. Lots of carry ons and passengers who don't mind blocking the entire process for 5 minutes doing some of the strangest things.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pacman
Hiring News
395
09-14-2013 04:03 AM
jetpilot4u
Major
74
08-13-2009 01:54 PM
Cooperd0g
Major
67
01-03-2008 02:29 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices