Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Most Twisted & Craziest TA things said??? >

Most Twisted & Craziest TA things said???

Search

Notices

Most Twisted & Craziest TA things said???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2018 | 12:46 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
Default

Originally Posted by 319wisperer
So do you share that same rational for the loss of transition? Are you ****ed that the guys who regularly bid transition conflicts ruined that for everyone? You do know that you can tell the company that we’re not giving up reserve rules or any other QOL provisions for substandard pay by voting no.
"Everyone knows" that transition conflicts made it into the 2010 contract by mistake and wouldn't last into the next one. It was a gross error by the company and everyone knew that, except for the handful that used it so much that they began to rely on it and consider it to be a natural born right.

I laughed out loud the first time I heard/read about the old transition conflict rules when I was job searching prior to coming to Spirit. Seemed funny as heck that something like that could sneak into a contract. Trading it away for an updated payscale was inevitable, so nobody "ruined transition". It was doomed the day the company realized what they'd signed.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 01:40 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: A320 Left
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
"Everyone knows" that transition conflicts made it into the 2010 contract by mistake and wouldn't last into the next one. It was a gross error by the company and everyone knew that, except for the handful that used it so much that they began to rely on it and consider it to be a natural born right.

I laughed out loud the first time I heard/read about the old transition conflict rules when I was job searching prior to coming to Spirit. Seemed funny as heck that something like that could sneak into a contract. Trading it away for an updated payscale was inevitable, so nobody "ruined transition". It was doomed the day the company realized what they'd signed.
I was merely making the point that it’s disingenuous calling the guys who work the reserve system to their advantage “turds”, yet not having the same dismay for the guys that work transition conflicts.

Either both transition and reserve drops are gone (if this TA passes) as both were taken advantage of at a big expense to the company or both are going away to put us in line with the industry standard (if the NC is to be believed).

But people like Tool can’t just slam the peeps that made strategic reserve drops without mentioning people who made strategic transition conflicts or peeps that prob called in sick one too many times on account of a sick parent, etc.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 03:31 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

If you turn pilots against pilots, they win.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 03:53 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 319wisperer
I was merely making the point that it’s disingenuous calling the guys who work the reserve system to their advantage “turds”, yet not having the same dismay for the guys that work transition conflicts.

Either both transition and reserve drops are gone (if this TA passes) as both were taken advantage of at a big expense to the company or both are going away to put us in line with the industry standard (if the NC is to be believed).

But people like Tool can’t just slam the peeps that made strategic reserve drops without mentioning people who made strategic transition conflicts or peeps that prob called in sick one too many times on account of a sick parent, etc.
Outside looking in.... Why is it always described as taking advantage or abusing the contract when you use the contract to maximize your pay/QOL? The company is going to try everything to skirt the contract and abuse the pilots.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 06:59 PM
  #45  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro4President
Outside looking in.... Why is it always described as taking advantage or abusing the contract when you use the contract to maximize your pay/QOL? The company is going to try everything to skirt the contract and abuse the pilots.
One could say; this aspect of the contract was going away regardless, while the other was used to the point in which the company viewed it as an issue to their inability to use a reserve pilot. They were both contractually compliant, however, one was perceived by many as a sacrificial lamb for a new contract, while the other was sacrificed due to the company’s argument to the NMB, and the union had no rebuttal.....
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 07:16 PM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro4President
Outside looking in.... Why is it always described as taking advantage or abusing the contract when you use the contract to maximize your pay/QOL? The company is going to try everything to skirt the contract and abuse the pilots.
Because in addition to people just working the contract to our advantage, spirit's reserve rules permitted things like a strange technique of checkerboarding reserve assignments by swapping half your schedule with another reserve pilot, basically sitting reserve every other day of the month. That effectively takes both pilots off the schedule completely for the whole month, with pay. That sort of thing doesn't help anyone and it was used by the company during mediation to justify eliminating nearly ALL reserve scheduling flexibility in the new contract, showing that it actually hurt the pilot group as a whole.

Yes it was simply "using" the contract as written, but there are an awful lot of perfectly legal things that are destructive enough to just not be done. And if they ARE done, it's used against the pilot group. I dunno how other people feel but I'm big-picture enough to resist the urge to do that sort of thing that gets me basically a month paid vacation at the expense of crapping on everyone when the next contract is negotiated.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 07:23 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
Default

Originally Posted by NKSpilot
If you turn pilots against pilots, they win.
Some pilots do selfish things that hurt everyone else, and then get all self-righteous when they're called out on it. The company doesn't have to do anything to make that happen, when a select group of people cause contract concessions through anti-social behavior.

Sure, checkerboarding is poetic justice considering the schenanigans the company has pulled with getting a new contract done. But it really is destructive. Anyone who thought that there would be no consequences for doing that just because the contract permitted it was pretty short-sighted IMHO.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 08:30 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 356
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
Because in addition to people just working the contract to our advantage, spirit's reserve rules permitted things like a strange technique of checkerboarding reserve assignments by swapping half your schedule with another reserve pilot, basically sitting reserve every other day of the month. That effectively takes both pilots off the schedule completely for the whole month, with pay. That sort of thing doesn't help anyone and it was used by the company during mediation to justify eliminating nearly ALL reserve scheduling flexibility in the new contract, showing that it actually hurt the pilot group as a whole.

Yes it was simply "using" the contract as written, but there are an awful lot of perfectly legal things that are destructive enough to just not be done. And if they ARE done, it's used against the pilot group. I dunno how other people feel but I'm big-picture enough to resist the urge to do that sort of thing that gets me basically a month paid vacation at the expense of crapping on everyone when the next contract is negotiated.
The way that you phrased this is suspect to say the least. We do not have to “swap” with another pilot to “checkerboard.” Flensr is not one of us... and if he is he’s a total moron. Your pilot faking game is weak bro... try again.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 08:38 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: A320 Left
Default

Originally Posted by BKbigfish
The way that you phrased this is suspect to say the least. We do not have to “swap” with another pilot to “checkerboard.” Flensr is not one of us... and if he is he’s a total moron. Your pilot faking game is weak bro... try again.
Exactly. He would know that reserves swapping between each other was an impossibility because of the inability of reserves to pick up or trade over GDOs. This only changed via arbitration that was won less than 2 weeks ago.
Reply
Old 02-24-2018 | 08:53 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 356
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by 319wisperer
Exactly. He would know that reserves swapping between each other was an impossibility because of the inability of reserves to pick up or trade over GDOs. This only changed via arbitration that was won less than 2 weeks ago.
This idiot’s (Flensr’s) first post was less than a year ago and he exclusively comments on the NK forums. You paid management *****s are so easy to spot it’s pathetic.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JoeyMeatballs
Hangar Talk
0
04-12-2009 04:32 AM
atpwannabe
Hangar Talk
15
03-06-2009 11:24 AM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
9
05-27-2006 06:19 PM
flybye
Flight Schools and Training
49
04-20-2006 05:47 AM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
0
01-24-2006 06:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices