![]() |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2993954)
Correct. Current flights are already sold and paid for. Upcoming demand, or lack thereof, is what is driving all the actions of the various management groups. NK is betting this passes quickly for the moment, but that’s hardly a given.
|
Fortune favors the bold. Fear is the enemy. Safe spaces are available for the frightened. I don't work for yellow, but, as an ever increasing part owner, I am counting on you.
|
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2993863)
We’ve not been as successful as we could have been with oil at that price point. Or do you think BS like AA’s foolery with the E island, fare matching and gate limiting at DFW would go on if their fuel prices were 20-30% higher than they’ve been for the last half decade? Give them $100+ per barrel oil and the price differential becomes stark in a ULCC’s favor.
If traffic demands recovers quickly enough, we might be able to take huge advantages of this oil price war. Heck, we might even start hedging, I know I would. Having said all that, there’s always going to be demand for ULCCs (taking covid19 and such extremes apart). In strong economies we stimulate first time flyers “creating” market traffic. In recessions, leisure premium travelers “step down” to fly cheaper. And lastly, don’t forget about independent business travelers that today might represent a very small % but will slowly grow as we add frequencies. |
Cheap oil does benefit everyone. And that’s the point. An environment where everyone can take advantage of the tailwind is not what the ULCC model was built for. That “fit fleet” of young, fuel efficient planes is meant to take advantage of the competition having to pay more for their oil and their older aircraft.
Fuel is the number one expense for any airline. The legacies can play their games to suppress the ULCC niche and it’s growth when that cost is low. Those opportunities are much more limited when oil is selling for a more traditional price point. This isn’t rocket science. The cost structure and higher personnel and support costs of the legacies make competition with a ULCC nearly untenable when oil costs more. |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2994116)
Cheap oil does benefit everyone. And that’s the point. An environment where everyone can take advantage of the tailwind is not what the ULCC model was built for. That “fit fleet” of young, fuel efficient planes is meant to take advantage of the competition having to pay more for their oil and their older aircraft.
Fuel is the number one expense for any airline. The legacies can play their games to suppress the ULCC niche and it’s growth when that cost is low. Those opportunities are much more limited when oil is selling for a more traditional price point. This isn’t rocket science. The cost structure and higher personnel and support costs of the legacies make competition with a ULCC nearly untenable when oil costs more. |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 2994172)
our fleet really isn’t that fuel efficient compared to any legacy right now. A CEO 320 built in 2016 burns the same as a CEO 320 built in 1995. We only have like what 25-30 NEO’s right now.
Also, we’re not hauling cargo for a third party, and our seat density is higher. That means we’re not flying them as heavy and we’re moving more butts per unit of fuel burn than say AA. Additionally, we’re accomplishing the same mission with smaller planes. A legacy would need a 767 or larger to move the same number of people as we do on a 321. Or a 757 to the same number as one of our 320s. Those fuel burns aren’t even close. And, as you’ve correctly noted, that gap widens as we essentially go all NEO from this point forward. Low fuel costs are a boon for us now as load factors will drop off with the current market scare. But we fare better in a more traditional demand environment with a normalized oil price. |
Investors don’t share the same sentiment. We are down almost 21% pre-market
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2995164)
Investors don’t share the same sentiment. We are down almost 21% pre-market
|
It’s really irrelevant what our stock price is at this point... until the hysteria calms down, all the stocks are misrepresented
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2995182)
It’s really irrelevant what our stock price is at this point... until the hysteria calms down, all the stocks are misrepresented
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands