Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
5-day delay in PBS bidding >

5-day delay in PBS bidding


Notices

5-day delay in PBS bidding

Old 03-09-2020 | 05:39 PM
  #81  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Simply because I believe F9 and NK (and UPS too for that matter) should pay new FOs more than most regionals pay their new FOs?

If you trigger THAT easily I’m sure I can pretty easily survive NEVER flying with you.
Calm down girls. Neither of you will have to fly with the other one.
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 08:30 PM
  #82  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Simply because I believe F9 and NK (and UPS too for that matter) should pay new FOs more than most regionals pay their new FOs?

If you trigger THAT easily I’m sure I can pretty easily survive NEVER flying with you.
Seems to me it’s more bragging than saying our new hires should get paid more.

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Where I will make more money in the next year than your new hires....
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 10:10 PM
  #83  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex
Seems to me it’s more bragging than saying our new hires should get paid more.
You can cherry-pick individual statements out of a long discussion to give almost any appearance but unfortunately for you the conversation is still on the server and anyone who wants to can look back and see the reality.

My assertion was simply that it would be better for pilot unity if first year pay was high enough that those coming in from the regionals weren’t having to take a pay cut to do so, and anyone who bothers to look back will see that’s precisely what I was saying. I wasn’t picking on NK in particular, F9 doesn’t do much better by their newbies and UPS actually does worse. In fact there are quite a few REGIONALS that pay their newbie FOs (counting signing bonuses) considerably more their first year than do NK, F9, or UPS. THAT isn’t even my opinion, simply a matter of fact. Nor was I even asserting that NK pay ought to be brought up to legacy or even SWA FO first year pay, simply that I didn’t think it ought to be a reduction from what most people were getting in the regionals. I conceded that in the long run people were certainly better off moving to any of those three majors - I CAN do the math - but simply opined that it would be better for pilot unity if some attention were given to eliminating the huge gap between second and first year pay in ensuing contracts. Now that may be naive, but until someone explains why I shouldn’t think that I’m afraid I’m sticking to it.

Now why that put a burr under the saddle of you and several other people on here I’m not really sure. But I flatter myself that I’m a reasonably open minded individual so I am certainly willing to listen to your argument.

So can you succinctly explain to me why you believe that new NK FOs should receive less pay their first year than new FOs at Republic, Air Whiskey, QX, and several other regionals receive AT A REGIONAL?

For added credit, could you explain why you and a few others appear to believe I’m an SOB for even asking the question?

I await your response with bated breath so please don’t take too long - I might pass out.
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 12:21 AM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
You can cherry-pick individual statements out of a long discussion to give almost any appearance but unfortunately for you the conversation is still on the server and anyone who wants to can look back and see the reality.

My assertion was simply that it would be better for pilot unity if first year pay was high enough that those coming in from the regionals weren’t having to take a pay cut to do so, and anyone who bothers to look back will see that’s precisely what I was saying. I wasn’t picking on NK in particular, F9 doesn’t do much better by their newbies and UPS actually does worse. In fact there are quite a few REGIONALS that pay their newbie FOs (counting signing bonuses) considerably more their first year than do NK, F9, or UPS. THAT isn’t even my opinion, simply a matter of fact. Nor was I even asserting that NK pay ought to be brought up to legacy or even SWA FO first year pay, simply that I didn’t think it ought to be a reduction from what most people were getting in the regionals. I conceded that in the long run people were certainly better off moving to any of those three majors - I CAN do the math - but simply opined that it would be better for pilot unity if some attention were given to eliminating the huge gap between second and first year pay in ensuing contracts. Now that may be naive, but until someone explains why I shouldn’t think that I’m afraid I’m sticking to it.

Now why that put a burr under the saddle of you and several other people on here I’m not really sure. But I flatter myself that I’m a reasonably open minded individual so I am certainly willing to listen to your argument.

So can you succinctly explain to me why you believe that new NK FOs should receive less pay their first year than new FOs at Republic, Air Whiskey, QX, and several other regionals receive AT A REGIONAL?

For added credit, could you explain why you and a few others appear to believe I’m an SOB for even asking the question?

I await your response with bated breath so please don’t take too long - I might pass out.
I’ll make this very simple. The issue is not someone saying “our new hire should get paid more.” The issue is that someone such as yourself, coming on here to brag about how you are making more than our new hire. It’s not a question when you make a statement such as the one i quoted, and that you seem happy about it. If you think it’s so bad, why would you even consider applying here?
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 02:11 AM
  #85  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex
I’ll make this very simple. The issue is not someone saying “our new hire should get paid more.” The issue is that someone such as yourself, coming on here to brag about how you are making more than our new hire. It’s not a question when you make a statement such as the one i quoted, and that you seem happy about it. If you think it’s so bad, why would you even consider applying here?
At this point in the conversation did you even read the lengthy well reasoned reply? You answered why you consider him an SOB but completely glossed over the question of year 1 vs year 2 pay disparity. Why, as pilots, do we tolerate this crap? Oh I forgot. We are pilots.
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 02:26 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Default

It's your money! Use it when you need it!

Call 877 CASH NOW.

Plane Coffee
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 03:38 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
You can cherry-pick individual statements out of a long discussion to give almost any appearance but unfortunately for you the conversation is still on the server and anyone who wants to can look back and see the reality.

My assertion was simply that it would be better for pilot unity if first year pay was high enough that those coming in from the regionals weren’t having to take a pay cut to do so, and anyone who bothers to look back will see that’s precisely what I was saying. I wasn’t picking on NK in particular, F9 doesn’t do much better by their newbies and UPS actually does worse. In fact there are quite a few REGIONALS that pay their newbie FOs (counting signing bonuses) considerably more their first year than do NK, F9, or UPS. THAT isn’t even my opinion, simply a matter of fact. Nor was I even asserting that NK pay ought to be brought up to legacy or even SWA FO first year pay, simply that I didn’t think it ought to be a reduction from what most people were getting in the regionals. I conceded that in the long run people were certainly better off moving to any of those three majors - I CAN do the math - but simply opined that it would be better for pilot unity if some attention were given to eliminating the huge gap between second and first year pay in ensuing contracts. Now that may be naive, but until someone explains why I shouldn’t think that I’m afraid I’m sticking to it.

Now why that put a burr under the saddle of you and several other people on here I’m not really sure. But I flatter myself that I’m a reasonably open minded individual so I am certainly willing to listen to your argument.

So can you succinctly explain to me why you believe that new NK FOs should receive less pay their first year than new FOs at Republic, Air Whiskey, QX, and several other regionals receive AT A REGIONAL?

For added credit, could you explain why you and a few others appear to believe I’m an SOB for even asking the question?

I await your response with bated breath so please don’t take too long - I might pass out.

I agree with everything you're saying, however, because of Spirit's Training Pay, our first year pay only looks better than UPS's if you are only looking at the hourly rate. Between (planning on) 3 months of training pay, and a lower monthly guarantee, Spirit comes in last. No one should be proud of first year pay here. Well, except those who brag about how they survived on last contract's pay. 45% 45% 45%!
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 05:20 AM
  #88  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

I think you guys are talking past each other. I don’t think there’s a single pilot here who doesn’t think that pay should be higher (not just for new hires), but across the board. How much negotiating capital should we put into it next cycle?
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 06:04 AM
  #89  
Omniscient's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
At this point in the conversation did you even read the lengthy well reasoned reply? You answered why you consider him an SOB but completely glossed over the question of year 1 vs year 2 pay disparity. Why, as pilots, do we tolerate this crap? Oh I forgot. We are pilots.
He didn’t gloss over anything. He pointed out how hypocritical it is for this guy to mock first year pay and how he will make more at Compass, while actively seeking a job to work at Spirit. As someone perfectly stated, “do as I say, not as I do”.

As to your point about 1st year pay vs 2nd year pay disparity. Would you rather them lower second year to bridge the gap between the two? Because it seems the gap isn’t your issue but the starting pay is your issue. This has been discussed on here before you even started here and yet, you applied and took the job because you did the math and realized it still a no brainer for you to leave a regional and come here. I’m sorry if the $20 increase in year 1 pay from last contract still isn’t sufficient to maintain your regional pilot quality of life you were accustomed to, (Mesa? “)

I look forward to seeing you and everyone who wants higher first year pay on the picket lines in a few years as we fight for our next contract. I’m sure the fire for higher first year pay will still burn bright in all of your hearts while 40 of us walk the picket line again.
Reply
Old 03-10-2020 | 06:06 AM
  #90  
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
You can cherry-pick individual statements out of a long discussion to give almost any appearance but unfortunately for you the conversation is still on the server and anyone who wants to can look back and see the reality.

My assertion was simply that it would be better for pilot unity if first year pay was high enough that those coming in from the regionals weren’t having to take a pay cut to do so, and anyone who bothers to look back will see that’s precisely what I was saying. I wasn’t picking on NK in particular, F9 doesn’t do much better by their newbies and UPS actually does worse. In fact there are quite a few REGIONALS that pay their newbie FOs (counting signing bonuses) considerably more their first year than do NK, F9, or UPS. THAT isn’t even my opinion, simply a matter of fact. Nor was I even asserting that NK pay ought to be brought up to legacy or even SWA FO first year pay, simply that I didn’t think it ought to be a reduction from what most people were getting in the regionals. I conceded that in the long run people were certainly better off moving to any of those three majors - I CAN do the math - but simply opined that it would be better for pilot unity if some attention were given to eliminating the huge gap between second and first year pay in ensuing contracts. Now that may be naive, but until someone explains why I shouldn’t think that I’m afraid I’m sticking to it.

Now why that put a burr under the saddle of you and several other people on here I’m not really sure. But I flatter myself that I’m a reasonably open minded individual so I am certainly willing to listen to your argument.

So can you succinctly explain to me why you believe that new NK FOs should receive less pay their first year than new FOs at Republic, Air Whiskey, QX, and several other regionals receive AT A REGIONAL?

For added credit, could you explain why you and a few others appear to believe I’m an SOB for even asking the question?

I await your response with bated breath so please don’t take too long - I might pass out.

Oh good, so we’re starting this up again...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
TheFly
SkyWest
49
09-07-2019 07:51 PM
Biffsteritis
Frontier
74
01-05-2019 09:17 PM
calmwinds
Mesa Airlines
12
03-28-2018 02:53 PM
No Nonsense
United
21
07-06-2017 10:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices