So I guess you know better than to accept the wager.

No. There is just zero point in arguing with you anymore.

Your prediction is an opinion, just like mine.

Goodluck to you and your career.

Got it you know you will lose and deep down you are wrong. Just like 3 weeks ago when you insisted there would not be major cuts in spirits schedule.

don’t worry furloughs won’t last forever and like the saying goes you are not truly a airline pilot until you have been furloughed

Because 3 weeks ago there was hardly any cuts communicated by our leadership team. Roughly 3% was first stated. I’m not going to apologize to you, of all people, for listening to them.

Naturally the situation evolved, but at that time, the numbers they had and could see indicated the minimal cuts they announced.

Dude seriously. Get a life man. You don’t work here and if you do you won’t have the balls to PM your employee number and name. Get lost.

Yes the situation is evolving, some of us have the ability to see where this is heading and some of us just want to kid themselves

Dr. Fauci: U.S. Coronavirus Deaths Could Near 200,000

https://www.dailywire.com/news/epide...mpaign=dwbrand

Two sides to everything. Well know when it’s all done.

Still waiting for my PM, Chief.

[Mod Edit]

Try not to just read the headlines.

From your article.

I think it would be helpful if I cleared up some confusion that has emerged in recent days. Some have interpreted my evidence to a UK parliamentary committee as indicating we have substantially revised our assessments of the potential mortality impact of COVID-19. This is not the case. Indeed, if anything, our latest estimates suggest that the virus is slightly more transmissible than we previously thought. Our lethality estimates remain unchanged. My evidence to Parliament referred to the deaths we assess might occur in the UK in the presence of the very intensive social distancing and other public health interventions now in place. Without those controls, our assessment remains that the UK would see the scale of deaths reported in our study (namely, up to approximately 500 thousand).

You are quoting a guy that predicts 2 Million US deaths to refute my article that says we could have 200,000.

You are embarrassing yourself

It was a simple illustration that the data and models are constantly changing. Of course you didn’t understand that.

For the record I do listen to Fauci. I won’t listen to a Trump Presser if I don’t see him on stage since he’s the only person with any sense of credibility in this country.

Even your beloved Fauci has changed his tone on things he said a couple weeks ago. As I said, well all know who was right and wrong when it’s over.

Its clear you get off on negativity and doomsday ness. I see your predictable Economy thread you just started.

And as predicted you don’t work here. If you send me your info I’d actually respect you, but we both know you won’t.

Why would anyone send a stranger in the Internet their personal info

You and I both know you just read the headline, that is why you used a guy predicting 2 million deaths as your good news rebuttal. My guess you are we’re hired a few years ago and just can’t wrap your head around the idea you could be furloughed

If you are so sure then our friendly wager is on?

I would agree with that, I’ve seen quite a few new folks that can’t quite understand how bad this is going to be and refuse to believe in furloughs. At this point it’s not worth debating with anyone they will find out soon enough how bad this will ultimately be. At this point everyone should just be hoping to have an airline to be recalled to.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk