Notices

April 06 class fll

Old 03-29-2020 | 11:23 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
I wasn’t talking to you lol. Trust me. Glad your here man! I was simply saying to ignore all
the folks with the doom and gloom.

A hell of a lot is still to change between (for the better if you ask me) now and October.

This is an awesome place. I left a competing LLC for here and couldn’t be any happier. Welcome again man! 😎
So I guess you know better than to accept the wager.
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 11:27 AM
  #82  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by 5and20
So I guess you know better than to accept the wager.
No. There is just zero point in arguing with you anymore.

Your prediction is an opinion, just like mine.

Goodluck to you and your career.
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 11:33 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
No. There is just zero point in arguing with you anymore.

Your prediction is an opinion, just like mine.

Goodluck to you and your career.
Got it you know you will lose and deep down you are wrong. Just like 3 weeks ago when you insisted there would not be major cuts in spirits schedule.

don’t worry furloughs won’t last forever and like the saying goes you are not truly a airline pilot until you have been furloughed
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 11:47 AM
  #84  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by 5and20
Got it you know you will lose and deep down you are wrong. Just like 3 weeks ago when you insisted there would not be major cuts in spirits schedule.

don’t worry furloughs won’t last forever and like the saying goes you are not truly a airline pilot until you have been furloughed
Because 3 weeks ago there was hardly any cuts communicated by our leadership team. Roughly 3% was first stated. I’m not going to apologize to you, of all people, for listening to them.

Naturally the situation evolved, but at that time, the numbers they had and could see indicated the minimal cuts they announced.

Dude seriously. Get a life man. You don’t work here and if you do you won’t have the balls to PM your employee number and name. Get lost.
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 11:54 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
Because 3 weeks ago there was hardly any cuts communicated by our leadership team. Roughly 3% was first stated. I’m not going to apologize to you, of all people, for listening to them.

Naturally the situation evolved, but at that time, the numbers they had and could see indicated the minimal cuts they announced.

Dude seriously. Get a life man. You don’t work here and if you do you won’t have the balls to PM your employee number and name. Get lost.
Yes the situation is evolving, some of us have the ability to see where this is heading and some of us just want to kid themselves

Dr. Fauci: U.S. Coronavirus Deaths Could Near 200,000
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 12:01 PM
  #86  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by 5and20
Yes the situation is evolving, some of us have the ability to see where this is heading and some of us just want to kid themselves

Dr. Fauci: U.S. Coronavirus Deaths Could Near 200,000
https://www.dailywire.com/news/epide...mpaign=dwbrand

Two sides to everything. Well know when it’s all done.

Still waiting for my PM, Chief.
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 12:35 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
https://www.dailywire.com/news/epide...mpaign=dwbrand

Two sides to everything. Well know when it’s all done.

Still waiting for my PM, Chief.
[Mod Edit]

Try not to just read the headlines.

From your article.

I think it would be helpful if I cleared up some confusion that has emerged in recent days. Some have interpreted my evidence to a UK parliamentary committee as indicating we have substantially revised our assessments of the potential mortality impact of COVID-19. This is not the case. Indeed, if anything, our latest estimates suggest that the virus is slightly more transmissible than we previously thought. Our lethality estimates remain unchanged. My evidence to Parliament referred to the deaths we assess might occur in the UK in the presence of the very intensive social distancing and other public health interventions now in place. Without those controls, our assessment remains that the UK would see the scale of deaths reported in our study (namely, up to approximately 500 thousand).

You are quoting a guy that predicts 2 Million US deaths to refute my article that says we could have 200,000.

You are embarrassing yourself

Last edited by Scoop; 04-02-2020 at 05:25 AM.
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 12:44 PM
  #88  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by 5and20;3016339


Try not to just read the headlines.

From your article.

I think it would be helpful if I cleared up some confusion that has emerged in recent days. Some have interpreted my evidence to a UK parliamentary committee as indicating we have substantially revised our assessments of the potential mortality impact of COVID-19. [b
This is not the case[/b]. Indeed, if anything, our latest estimates suggest that the virus is slightly more transmissible than we previously thought. Our lethality estimates remain unchanged. My evidence to Parliament referred to the deaths we assess might occur in the UK in the presence of the very intensive social distancing and other public health interventions now in place. Without those controls, our assessment remains that the UK would see the scale of deaths reported in our study (namely, up to approximately 500 thousand).

You are quoting a guy that predicts 2 Million US deaths to refute my article that says we could have 200,000.

You are embarrassing yourself
It was a simple illustration that the data and models are constantly changing. Of course you didn’t understand that.

For the record I do listen to Fauci. I won’t listen to a Trump Presser if I don’t see him on stage since he’s the only person with any sense of credibility in this country.

Even your beloved Fauci has changed his tone on things he said a couple weeks ago. As I said, well all know who was right and wrong when it’s over.

Its clear you get off on negativity and doomsday ness. I see your predictable Economy thread you just started.

And as predicted you don’t work here. If you send me your info I’d actually respect you, but we both know you won’t.

Last edited by Scoop; 04-02-2020 at 05:26 AM.
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 01:01 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
It was a simple illustration that the data and models are constantly changing. Of course you didn’t understand that.

For the record I do listen to Fauci. I won’t listen to a Trump Presser if I don’t see him on stage since he’s the only person with any sense of credibility in this country.

Even your beloved Fauci has changed his tone on things he said a couple weeks ago. As I said, well all know who was right and wrong when it’s over.

Its clear you get off on negativity and doomsday ness. I see your predictable Economy thread you just started.

And as predicted you don’t work here. If you send me your info I’d actually respect you, but we both know you won’t.
Why would anyone send a stranger in the Internet their personal info

You and I both know you just read the headline, that is why you used a guy predicting 2 million deaths as your good news rebuttal. My guess you are we’re hired a few years ago and just can’t wrap your head around the idea you could be furloughed

If you are so sure then our friendly wager is on?
Reply
Old 03-29-2020 | 01:41 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 5and20

My guess you are we’re hired a few years ago and just can’t wrap your head around the idea you could be furloughed

I would agree with that, I’ve seen quite a few new folks that can’t quite understand how bad this is going to be and refuse to believe in furloughs. At this point it’s not worth debating with anyone they will find out soon enough how bad this will ultimately be. At this point everyone should just be hoping to have an airline to be recalled to.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spirited
Spirit
63
03-20-2020 09:25 PM
MCFlyer
American
6031
02-11-2020 08:21 AM
md11pilot11
SkyWest
6
10-30-2019 09:59 AM
VrefPlus5
PSA Airlines
31
05-09-2018 02:04 PM
BoynamedSue
Hiring News
0
03-24-2005 12:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices