Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
Spirit Now Sure As It Emerges From Bankruptcy >

Spirit Now Sure As It Emerges From Bankruptcy


Notices

Spirit Now Sure As It Emerges From Bankruptcy

Old 08-28-2025 | 09:39 AM
  #1501  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 111
Default

Originally Posted by mudpie
Y'all lose money on flying. The PW issues are a blessing. The less planes flying and less money the company loses. At least PW paying for the planes to be grounded.
It’s not explicitly clear in articles but Spirit received mostly credits and not just plain cash. And if they did receive cash it didn’t cover the cost of the airplanes down. It’s certainly not a blessing in any shape or form.
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 09:49 AM
  #1502  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 111
Default

Originally Posted by flier320
N936NK grounded 9/19/23 .... 708 days
N932NK grounded 9/20/23 .... 707 days
N937NK grounded 9/21/23 .... 706 days
N943NK grounded 9/28/23 .... 698 days
N907NK grounded 11/6/23 .... 660 days
N940NK grounded 11/7/23 .... 659 days
N912NK grounded 12/4/23 .... 633 days

plus multiple early 2024

yeah, 800 days will come fast......
Terrible. Hopefully they can start cycling back to active status soon. That’s at least 6 planes that should have been well back into active status.
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 09:52 AM
  #1503  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
It’s not explicitly clear in articles but Spirit received mostly credits and not just plain cash. And if they did receive cash it didn’t cover the cost of the airplanes down. It’s certainly not a blessing in any shape or form.
How do you know what the cost of having an airplane down is? We do know apparently Spirit loses money on operating planes.

Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 10:08 AM
  #1504  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by sioux8ships
How are we not suing Pratt for this? Did Ted sign some deal buying these engines "as is". I'm sorry but $150 milion mx credit isn't helping.
Sue them for what? When you buy a fleet of cars for your business and there's a recall that takes it out of service. The manufacturer has an obligation to fix the product, they're not liable for loss of use, unless specifically stated in the purchase contract. That insurance is typically an additional option either offered by the manufacturer or 3rd party.

I guess you can try and see if there's negligence or willfully misrepresenting a known faulty product. Or is 400 days turnaround reasonable.

Obviously NK management and their lawyers thought whatever it is they're got from this is fair or it's all they're likely to get considering the risk/reward of litigation.
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 10:43 AM
  #1505  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 20
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
If Pratt had to pay in cash for the harm done to every airline in the world this disaster has caused Pratt wouldn’t exist anymore and then there would never be any engines.
This is a pile of horse****. When it became known that all of our NEO engines were affected, I was following RTX VERY closely. Their next quarterly report, they announced a $10 BILLION stock buyback. How the **** is that legal?!
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 10:47 AM
  #1506  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 38
Default

Interesting, JetBlue has said the PW issues are tracking under a year now.
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 11:07 AM
  #1507  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 29
From: baller, shot caller
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Interesting, JetBlue has said the PW issues are tracking under a year now.
Jetblue has said a lot of stuff in the past...
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 11:35 AM
  #1508  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 287
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by mudpie
Sue them for what? When you buy a fleet of cars for your business and there's a recall that takes it out of service. The manufacturer has an obligation to fix the product, they're not liable for loss of use, unless specifically stated in the purchase contract. That insurance is typically an additional option either offered by the manufacturer or 3rd party.

I guess you can try and see if there's negligence or willfully misrepresenting a known faulty product. Or is 400 days turnaround reasonable.

Obviously NK management and their lawyers thought whatever it is they're got from this is fair or it's all they're likely to get considering the risk/reward of litigation.
Filler…………
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 11:43 AM
  #1509  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by SSlow
Jetblue has said a lot of stuff in the past...

At the time, RTX estimated a turnaround time (TAT) of around 250 to 300 days for an engine to be removed and then reinstalled on the wing, meaning that airlines would have to ground an A320neo family aircraft for the better part of the year unless they receive spare engines.

if spirits aircraft are being grounded for more than a year something else is going on.
Reply
Old 08-28-2025 | 11:50 AM
  #1510  
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 111
Default

Originally Posted by mudpie
How do you know what the cost of having an airplane down is? We do know apparently Spirit loses money on operating planes.
I don’t but I can make an educated guess.

-if it’s leased lease rates are between 300-400k. Size and age of lease change the variable but a safe guess is 350k a month for the 320s.

-if it’s owned then there are finance charges and depreciation. Who knows what those combined are but again a safe bet is 200-300k per month. Of course depreciation probably isnt realized until the asset leaves the property so not a direct operating cost yet but it will be eventually.

-Maintenance costs. That will vary wildly but will not be cheap and the longer the airplane is down the more expensive it will be to get it back to active status

-Insurance. No idea there but certainly not free.

-Staff. Pilots, FAs, and every other support staff that wasn’t being used to their full potential are going to be at least half a million per plane. Under utilized captains alone probably cost a half million per plane. (Pre furlough) sorry Spirit team…it is a raw deal.

So a very conservative estimate is 500k per month per plane down and probably even substantially more. The credits (cash?) would have the potential to offset that amount but I highly doubt they covered the whole cost of the airplanes being down. Especially if they are down for 400 days longer than anticipated.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hockeypilot44
Spirit
515
04-27-2020 07:36 PM
Group W Bench
Major
18
04-29-2012 07:17 PM
trent890
Charter
17
04-15-2012 06:39 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
06-02-2005 05:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices