Government BAILOUT Spirit
#221
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 102
From: Whale FO
Most people who were investing based on the trial said Judge young was a wild card, definitely not what people would consider a ‘Republican judge’ now. He was a law nerd as you could tell from his writings and he was trying to leave a legacy behind for himself to be remembered after he retired. The democrats got the perfect judge actually. I wouldn’t be surprised if he knew Elizabeth Warren personally.
But regardless of that, it should not have gone to a trial. Biden admin did not have an obligation to sue. They should have worked out some divestitures and signed off on it like how all the other bigger airlines got to their size.
But regardless of that, it should not have gone to a trial. Biden admin did not have an obligation to sue. They should have worked out some divestitures and signed off on it like how all the other bigger airlines got to their size.
There are many illegal activities where no-one has an "obligation" to sue, but it's definitely the right thing to do. Remember, this deal was pushed by the shareholders against the advice from the board as the board back then knew the likelihood was slim that this would pass given jetBlues comments about removing competition. And then the CEO can't drop his ego for a second and admit this is a necessary transaction.
Blaming Biden is DDS.
#222
Before going down that rabbit hole, where does that $500 million come from? Which budget? Where is it appropriated at? Article I of the Constitution and the Appropriations Clause gives the control of the purse to the Congress, not President. If the President claims this is a national emergency that bypasses the timeline requirements of the DPA, I bet that will get shot down very very quickly by the SCOTUS through the shadow docket. The entire reliance on DPA sounds like a complete red herring anyway.
If the bondholders give flexibility on payment deadlines, they have to have reasonable faith that Congress can pass a bill to allow this to happen.
So perhaps the bondholders, the stakeholders, and everyone involved agree to this arrangement, I am yet to hear a convincing argument how this would be legal.
If the bondholders give flexibility on payment deadlines, they have to have reasonable faith that Congress can pass a bill to allow this to happen.
So perhaps the bondholders, the stakeholders, and everyone involved agree to this arrangement, I am yet to hear a convincing argument how this would be legal.
lol, do you think Trump cares if its “legal” 😂😂.
#223
Guest
Posts: n/a
#224
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Your DDS is on full display here. Elizabeth Warren? Come on now, that's got nothing to do with any of this.
There are many illegal activities where no-one has an "obligation" to sue, but it's definitely the right thing to do. Remember, this deal was pushed by the shareholders against the advice from the board as the board back then knew the likelihood was slim that this would pass given jetBlues comments about removing competition. And then the CEO can't drop his ego for a second and admit this is a necessary transaction.
Blaming Biden is DDS.
There are many illegal activities where no-one has an "obligation" to sue, but it's definitely the right thing to do. Remember, this deal was pushed by the shareholders against the advice from the board as the board back then knew the likelihood was slim that this would pass given jetBlues comments about removing competition. And then the CEO can't drop his ego for a second and admit this is a necessary transaction.
Blaming Biden is DDS.
You’re right, it should be Lina Khan
#225
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 167
I don’t see how any of this actually gets through Congress and the courts. If the government somehow decides to give Spirit taxpayer money, the other LCC’s will sue for their share as well. If the government then went to the extreme and gave money to all LCC’s, the big 4 would tie that up in the courts arguing that the government had created an unfair business environment by subsidizing value carriers and allowing them to operate at a loss. I still say that the administration is putting on a show and doesn’t expect actually do anything. There isn’t enough support in Congress to shell out large sums of money and legal challenges will be bad press for the administration and void any political gains. They want the story to be that the administration saved jobs and low cost travel. They don’t want the dismal balance sheets and poor management history to be brought into the light by the opposition.
#226
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 501
Even the most die hard Republican pilot will become a socialist once their job is on the line. So with that said, why are they so quick to judge other bailouts for other people in which it would affect their personal lives that are upended?
#228
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 182
Likes: 25
As I understand it the judge originally said he could schedule a hearing as soon as Monday if everyone's on board.. sounds like two of three are on board bondholders aren't.. so now I'm hearing it *would* be scheduled for Thursday (payroll day) if everyone is on board.. but as of yet I don't see it on the calendar?
#229
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 138
Likes: 42
From: ERJ CA
As I understand it the judge originally said he could schedule a hearing as soon as Monday if everyone's on board.. sounds like two of three are on board bondholders aren't.. so now I'm hearing it *would* be scheduled for Thursday (payroll day) if everyone is on board.. but as of yet I don't see it on the calendar?
#230
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 237
Likes: 247
Wrong. A judge appointed by the republicans made that decision. Sounds like you failed your civics class. You seem to think it's ok to do illegal things as long as no-one complains.
The CEO sealed the deal by saying Spirit doesn't need the merger to stay viable. "Path to profitability" is what he said. That is why the judge dismissed the distressed carrier argument.
The CEO sealed the deal by saying Spirit doesn't need the merger to stay viable. "Path to profitability" is what he said. That is why the judge dismissed the distressed carrier argument.
Biden Administration who brought a case the the U.S. courts the Trump administration never would.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM



