Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2015 | 02:06 PM
  #13691  
Rainbows's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: Low paid Airbus gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Metal Slug
You will. You are going to lose 29/7 and transition conflict language in exchange for jerkBlue hourly pay plus 3%. It's on the table, bubba!

For the emotional crybabies who thought it would be a good idea to have an MEC of Mesa losers go up against the professional gangsters of Spirit management: The California drought is going to be cured from your tears when Ben and Bendo finish raping you on this contract. Ack-Ack and Friends will be there to help ease it in.
Yeah I know we will. I just wanted tough talk on record before we see a TA. I just read the update email, saw the 29/7 language. But, hey look we'll have higher hourly pay rates so we'll look good on the APC airline profiles page.
Old 09-04-2015 | 02:28 PM
  #13692  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
The 29/7 was mentioned. Removing 29/7 renders the transition conflict language next to worthless except for a couple other instances.

I mentioned this productivity issue with the efb loa and nobody listened.
I thought the official fall-back whiner position of APCers was that transition only helped the ubber-senior that were lucky enough to work the system. Now one piece of that may be gone, and it's the end of the world. For the record, I don't like giving up 29/7 either.

And yeah, you were the only one against the efb loa.
Old 09-04-2015 | 02:34 PM
  #13693  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Default

So is the 29/7 being trading for J.B. + 3% pay rates? I'm new, what's the 29/7? Sorry for asking.
Old 09-04-2015 | 02:47 PM
  #13694  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
I thought the official fall-back whiner position of APCers was that transition only helped the ubber-senior that were lucky enough to work the system. Now one piece of that may be gone, and it's the end of the world. For the record, I don't like giving up 29/7 either.

And yeah, you were the only one against the efb loa.
From a pay perspective that's actually true. From a productivity, seniority, and value perspective it's item number one and that affects us all. It's our number one piece of leverage for a truly industry leading contract.
Old 09-04-2015 | 03:00 PM
  #13695  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Super EZ E
So is the 29/7 being trading for J.B. + 3% pay rates? I'm new, what's the 29/7? Sorry for asking.
You cannot be scheduled to fly more than 29 hours in 7 calendar days. A holdover from old 121 rules that is codified in the CBA.

I personally like it, because I can cause all sorts of transition conflicts even if I don't work every single day in a row during transition.

People who like to pick up OT at 100% hate it because they can't pick up some high credit trips. And it does make trading some 4 day sequences problematic...
Old 09-04-2015 | 04:50 PM
  #13696  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks didn't know if the 29/7 was something else. Does anyone at the Union have any idea the productive gains the company would get or how it would change the Crew scheduling matrix if the 29/7 was gone? Just wondering..
Old 09-04-2015 | 04:53 PM
  #13697  
dn_wisconsin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Would you guys knock off the speculation? JetBlue rates plus 3%? Did you hear that from the same "legitimate" source that said we were close to a TA a day ago?

Wait for the TA, read it carefully and then decide.

On the 29/7, I'd gladly get rid of it if we got rid of trip averaging and a real min per calendar day. 5.25 or higher. I'd rather be paid when I'm at work and have more efficient trips then be capped. If you can credit 32-35 hours in 6 days it means more days off. Days you won't need to fight for a conflict. Just my opinion.
Old 09-04-2015 | 05:50 PM
  #13698  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

I've had the 29/7 rule burn me more than it's helped. A bunch of trades I couldn't do because of it. It would have really helped me in the transition for Aug/sep but I wasn't senior enough to get the line that I wanted. So I'll gladly see it go. And I'm not one to pick up 100% trips. Just trying to improve my days off usually.
Old 09-04-2015 | 06:17 PM
  #13699  
kansas's Avatar
Swearing at the FMA
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: MD-88 FO
Default

Originally Posted by dn_wisconsin
On the 29/7, I'd gladly get rid of it if we got rid of trip averaging and a real min per calendar day. 5.25 or higher. I'd rather be paid when I'm at work and have more efficient trips then be capped. If you can credit 32-35 hours in 6 days it means more days off. Days you won't need to fight for a conflict. Just my opinion.
This...Go to work, work hard, go home. As far as "industry average" goes, our trips are very inefficient for pay. No more 28 hour 6 days!
Old 09-04-2015 | 09:25 PM
  #13700  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

All legit takes on 29/7. I'm not advocating keeping it or letting it go I'm just hoping we realize it's value to the company and it's a lot more than a 5.25 min day. That's what delta got for it in their part 117 loa last year. Ask them if they'd do it again. That one item is our highest leverage. Once the company has it in hand they have zero incentive to give us anything more. Attrition is the only other thing that could push them for a better contract and it's very slow at this time and collectively we don't control it. We own 29/7 and control it's worth if we are smart. It's only 2nd to going from hard lines to pbs on a productivity and value scale. Would we even consider pbs for a 5.25 min day? I don't think so. For an industry leading contract I'm sure. This is that valuable to them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices