Spirit of NKS
#1841
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 40
Hey Sailor, why are you allowing that 4 leg red eye pairing? It is dangerous. I am utterly appalled that the union signed off on this. I am dumbfounded. With help from God, I hope all those pairings complete safely. Where is ALPA and our MEC on this. Is it true they are OK with it?
Peace and God be with us...
#1842
Hey Sailor, why are you allowing that 4 leg red eye pairing? It is dangerous. I am utterly appalled that the union signed off on this. I am dumbfounded. With help from God, I hope all those pairings complete safely. Where is ALPA and our MEC on this. Is it true they are OK with it?
Peace and God be with us...
Peace and God be with us...
#1843
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 40
Why do you say cheers all the time? It's annoying.
Peace Out!!!
#1844
Hey Sailor, why are you allowing that 4 leg red eye pairing? It is dangerous. I am utterly appalled that the union signed off on this. I am dumbfounded. With help from God, I hope all those pairings complete safely. Where is ALPA and our MEC on this. Is it true they are OK with it?
Peace and God be with us...
Peace and God be with us...
SA 09 626 FLL-MCO 2001 2057 0056 0030 319
SA 09 195 MCO-FLL 2127 2229 0102 0111 319
SA 09 779 FLL-BQN 2340 0204 0224 0056 320
SU 10 604 BQN-FLL 0300 0527 0227 320
Let's see, 1916 show, four legs, released at 0557. NICE! (BTW, anyone get the latest tropical update yet?)
My favorite part is the 1:11 turn in fll, just enough time to get tired. SWEET!
I thought we had more input into the pairing/line construction now.
Perhaps the scheduling committee confused "TAKING IT BACK" with "TAKING IT FROM THE BACK"
#1845
That pairing is EXTREMELY dangerous. The only thing I think of is that the union is taking the position of, "Okay company, go ahead and do this to our guys...see what happens to your little schedule when our guys call out fatigued in BQN in the middle of the night."
No union leader in their right mind would sign off on that type of pairing...or, would they???
No union leader in their right mind would sign off on that type of pairing...or, would they???
Last edited by ALPO Whisperer; 09-13-2010 at 07:51 PM.
#1846
That pairing is EXTREMELY dangerous. The only thing I think of is that the union is taking the position of, "Okay company, go ahead and do this to our guys...see what happens to your little schedule when our guys call out fatigued in BQN in the middle of the night."
No union leader in their right mind would sign off on that type of pairing...or, would they???
No union leader in their right mind would sign off on that type of pairing...or, would they???
#1850
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
BTW, i do agree that next month's lines suck arss. Obviously, the Company nor our union seem to care anyway...My point is, that it doesn't matter what kind of contract, our company can care less.
Cheers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post