Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS, Part II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2015, 09:13 AM
  #1911  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 715
Default

Originally Posted by 390SetBlue
Forget about PBS. The company controls pairing construction. The pairings are the problem not line bidding. Increase the min day and get rid of trip averaging and watch the schedules improve. IF YOU WANT PBS GO TO A CARRIER THAT HAS PBS!
Exactly right. Our union has zero influence in pairing construction. The company typically runs the pairing construction software to produce a solution with minimum soft time above all else. This results in an overwhelming amount of unproductive four day trips at the expense of most other types of pairings (due to averaging). This is also why we have such poor line 'purity.' The four days pay so little that a day turn (which likely also credits little) must be tacked on to create a five day work block. This is a bad outcome for both commuters and locals.

Bottom line: garbage pairings produce garbage lines under our current system or PBS. No reason to entertain PBS at all.
ManFlex is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 09:15 AM
  #1912  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 391
Default

Originally Posted by 390SetBlue
Forget about PBS. The company controls pairing construction. The pairings are the problem not line bidding. Increase the min day and get rid of trip averaging and watch the schedules improve. IF YOU WANT PBS GO TO A CARRIER THAT HAS PBS!
Agreed. Just to add, I think a good trip rig and duty rig is equally important. It would put pressure on building efficiency into trips. 1hr of pay per 3.5 hrs TAFB would be good. It's possible to have a 96hr 4day trip that pays only 22hrs even with 5.5 min day. However with the rig above that 96hr TAFB trip would be worth 27.4hrs.
Lakeaffect is online now  
Old 12-15-2015, 09:20 AM
  #1913  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GWY320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 178
Default Spirit of NKS, Part II

Agreed.

3.5:1 industry average rig
GWY320 is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 09:20 AM
  #1914  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 784
Default

So can anyone confirm if two guys recently got fired from initial cause they couldn't get along? Did this scene possible occur during class? http://youtu.be/h1mKmTYBF-8
ovrtake92 is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 09:45 AM
  #1915  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by 390SetBlue
Forget about PBS. The company controls pairing construction. The pairings are the problem not line bidding. Increase the min day and get rid of trip averaging and watch the schedules improve. IF YOU WANT PBS GO TO A CARRIER THAT HAS PBS!

I don't want PBS. But I most definitely want industry leading pay rates, while maximizing days off. I'll keep an open mind to whatever makes that possible.
daves is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 10:12 AM
  #1916  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by otter1
You are correct. I don't like what I'm hearing (admittedly secondhand so it could be incorrect) that the company can pay only a few above industry average. The Union should not agree to that. We need to fix the slope of the pay scale, not make it worse! So in effect the company is saying:

The vast majority of pilots, those who are currently the furthest below industry average, can not get a small raise so that a small group of captains at the top of the pay scale, already closer to industry average, can get a huge raise.
Have you given any consideration to the thought that this is the way the mgmt. and (to a slight extent senior union leadership) want it?

If the payscale encourages a small majority of junior people to "move on" before they become senior people, then you get a huge labor discount by operating the airline at a significant juniority as compared to it's competition. This means more money for the most senior and mgmt. alike.
full of luv is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 10:13 AM
  #1917  
Swearing at the FMA
 
kansas's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 902
Default

Originally Posted by GWY320
Agreed.

3.5:1 industry average rig
There is zero reason for us to not get this.

The company line is that they want "efficiency." In this case, we want pairings with more efficiency. Better for them, better for us.
kansas is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 10:49 AM
  #1918  
Gets Weekends Off
 
390SetBlue's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by daves
I don't want PBS. But I most definitely want industry leading pay rates, while maximizing days off. I'll keep an open mind to whatever makes that possible.
Why focus on pay rates alone? Pay rates are only one variable in the equation that = total compensation. I want job security, high yearly earnings, excellent insurance, a comfortable retirement, and great quality of life. Having the highest pay rates in the industry doesn't mean a thing if you don't have security and can't enjoy life.
390SetBlue is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 10:58 AM
  #1919  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by 390SetBlue
Why focus on pay rates alone? Pay rates are only one variable in the equation that = total compensation. I want job security, high yearly earnings, excellent insurance, a comfortable retirement, and great quality of life. Having the highest pay rates in the industry doesn't mean a thing if you don't have security and can't enjoy life.

Sure, I agree with all that. But I also don't want to have to 'game' the system and work on days off to get that total compensation to where the rest of the industry is.
daves is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 11:19 AM
  #1920  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,397
Default

Originally Posted by ovrtake92
So can anyone confirm if two guys recently got fired from initial cause they couldn't get along? Did this scene possible occur during class? http://youtu.be/h1mKmTYBF-8
Dunno but I keep hearing of MULTIPLE INITIAL failures. I thought the instructors were pretty good and found nothing really wrong with the training here. Are we really not able to attract at least average pilots, or is something else going on?????
Chimpy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
De La Ghetto
Flight Schools and Training
22
11-26-2014 05:41 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
N618FT
Regional
33
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices