Notices

Spirit of NKS, Part II

Old 10-28-2015 | 08:06 AM
  #521  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 20
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Right now NK mgmt seems to have y'all focused on using your "cheap costs" to grow ever larger, hopefully you'll be as proud of the destination as a place to work as mgmt will be in manipulating you to get there.
I'm not sure how much you follow our metrics or our management, so I'll keep it brief. Managements laser-like focus on costs is not for growing the airline, it's to keep our planes full which increases our profit (remember, over 40% of our revenue comes from non-ticket related items). The more full the plane, the higher our non-ticket revenue is (increases profit). Keeping costs down should be the goal of all airline managements, so I don't know why you're singling out NKS...

The markets we serve, and are growing into, stimulate their own demand. In each city pair we add service, passenger traffic grows nearly equally to the amount of service we add. We're not robbing passengers from AA or Delta (in fact, the opposite is what's happening). The difference is we can do it more profitably than they can (look at profit margins) now, and when oil returns to a higher level, they'll be doing it at a loss. People have the misconception that we steal everyone else's passengers, and the numbers point out that it's just patently false. Our passengers tend to think of flying for a vacation as purchase right up there with buying an appliance (they're big ticket purchases that they are using their discretionary income for). It's not that they will fly, they'll either not go, or if they do go, it'll likely be the cheapest option...

Hope this helped explain a few things. So much for brief!!
Old 10-28-2015 | 08:08 AM
  #522  
line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Classic grammar nazi attack! Got no substance? Go for the grammar
Hmmmm....most of your guys' postings on here are addressing shortcomings in some aspect of either spirit's, or other's behaviors and/or beliefs. If one read my post accurately, then please explain how my observation is any different than yours. What substance do you bring that is lacking in the post to which you are referring?
Old 10-28-2015 | 08:09 AM
  #523  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 20
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
I think what he means is AA is not sustainable if they match our prices everywhere, not that Spirit is unsustainable????
Yes sir! Thanks!
Old 10-28-2015 | 08:18 AM
  #524  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Never thought I'd see the day when Virgin's stock price would be higher than Spirit. Different market cap though, but spread about 1.5 billion and closing. It's time to get the mergers rolling at the LCC-Major level. IMO it's the only way we can somewhat "guarantee" long term success. The players left are Alaska, Hawaiian, jetBlue, Spirit, Virgin, Frontier, Allegiant, and to a far lesser degree Sun Country. Some combinations should be allowed by the DOT to better compete with the 4 legacy carriers.
I think you're right on the merger front, but the only mergers that make sense to me right now would be JetBlue and Alaska. I don't see Allegiant being an attractive merger, even as profitable as it is, it doesn't really fit in with anyone. Virgin is attractive, but it would be at a premium, the quality of the product is probably better than JetBlue, but not enough to warrant a purchase. Hawaiian and Alaska make some sort of sense, but I think Hawaiian will do what it can to stay independent. It would take an awfully big payment to purchase Frontier right now, a huge premium over what they're worth, I just don't see anyone paying that premium. That leaves Spirit, which I'm starting to believe is becoming a little vulnerable. With the amount of firm orders and cash on hand, it's a little the same with Frontier, the premium on the shares will probably be too high to stomach.

Don't try to compare the listed price on an individual share of stock though, it's really like comparing Apple(s) to oranges.

Oh, and I know you meant to say DOJ instead of DOT, but you're right, while I don't think any further mergers involving the Big 4 will be allowed, unless something drastic happens, I don't see the same sort of opposition to a merger involving smaller airlines, including the legacies of Alaska and Hawaiian.

Originally Posted by Tranquility
I'm not sure how much you follow our metrics or our management, so I'll keep it brief. Managements laser-like focus on costs is not for growing the airline, it's to keep our planes full which increases our profit (remember, over 40% of our revenue comes from non-ticket related items). The more full the plane, the higher our non-ticket revenue is (increases profit). Keeping costs down should be the goal of all airline managements, so I don't know why you're singling out NKS...

The markets we serve, and are growing into, stimulate their own demand. In each city pair we add service, passenger traffic grows nearly equally to the amount of service we add. We're not robbing passengers from AA or Delta (in fact, the opposite is what's happening). The difference is we can do it more profitably than they can (look at profit margins) now, and when oil returns to a higher level, they'll be doing it at a loss. People have the misconception that we steal everyone else's passengers, and the numbers point out that it's just patently false. Our passengers tend to think of flying for a vacation as purchase right up there with buying an appliance (they're big ticket purchases that they are using their discretionary income for). It's not that they will fly, they'll either not go, or if they do go, it'll likely be the cheapest option...

Hope this helped explain a few things. So much for brief!!
Spot on!
Old 10-28-2015 | 08:21 AM
  #525  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: 320 Left soon middle
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
Well, we cater to leisure travelers. Where do leisure travelers go?? FLL (cruises), MCO (Disney), Vegas (gambling, hookers, blow)... Start with that, or, look at the city pairs we launched in our newer markets (MCI and CLE). I honestly can't remember what our first routes there were. We're not a hub and spoke airline so, while we may add ORD and DFW to the mix, I don't this those would be the first routes out of a new market. I could be wrong....
I thought we were VFR (visiting family and relatives), and leisure next.

Well... I don't know what Spirit will do differently if anything. As I've said, it was a total speculation on my part. So far we have tried to stay clear of competition and the motto was: "Put the plane where it makes the most money." If that still means one more route out of ORD, than we might very well continue with the existing hubs.
Old 10-28-2015 | 08:33 AM
  #526  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Any word on the special NC meeting? Wasn't that yesterday?
Old 10-28-2015 | 08:39 AM
  #527  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: 320 Left soon middle
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman
With current fuel it absolutely is sustainable. High fuel price would hurt AA more than Spirit in this battle, but for now AA seems willing to fight.
Perhaps so. But it is hardly a strategy to chase Spirit out of DFW and then do nothing. Low oil is not here to stay and AA knows it. Saudi's budget deficit for 2015 is predicted to be $107 billions by the IMF. This article shows each country's break even price to balance their budget. For Saudi it is around $105/barrel.

Break-even oil prices for all the major producers in the world - Business Insider

At this rate Saudi is predicted to run out of money in 5 years. I doubt they will go all the way. Not to mention Saudi is not the only one with a deficit. Other countries running out will destabilize the region even more. It is already happening. They can close the pipe tomorrow. It is up to them.

AA would be stupid to just make a short term move. Oil will rise once again and we will be back asking for more gates. Killing or cannibalizing Spirit and Frontier both is certainly possible. But it is not a solution. Another Spirit will pop up the moment oil is back up. The long term solution is to create a sub-brand or shift the brand and enter that market.
Old 10-28-2015 | 09:03 AM
  #528  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by Normann
Perhaps so. But it is hardly a strategy to chase Spirit out of DFW and then do nothing. Low oil is not here to stay and AA knows it. Saudi's budget deficit for 2015 is predicted to be $107 billions by the IMF. This article shows each country's break even price to balance their budget. For Saudi it is around $105/barrel.

Break-even oil prices for all the major producers in the world - Business Insider

At this rate Saudi is predicted to run out of money in 5 years. I doubt they will go all the way. Not to mention Saudi is not the only one with a deficit. Other countries running out will destabilize the region even more. It is already happening. They can close the pipe tomorrow. It is up to them.

AA would be stupid to just make a short term move. Oil will rise once again and we will be back asking for more gates. Killing or cannibalizing Spirit and Frontier both is certainly possible. But it is not a solution. Another Spirit will pop up the moment oil is back up. The long term solution is to create a sub-brand or shift the brand and enter that market.
Not every airline has to serve every customer. Costco isn't trying to win Walmart customers by and large. In fact Costco patrons pay a small fee not to shop with Walmart customers. But there are always a few crossovers.
Delta announced a year ago that they were going to offer the last few seats on every flt as a "unbundled fare" competitor. They don't get assigned seats and pay for all bags etc but they got the flt for minimal fare.
I didn't get from Aa that they planned on matching nk on all markets but to just ensure that the unbundled crowd has an option on markets that they already compete in.
Old 10-28-2015 | 09:17 AM
  #529  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: 320 Left soon middle
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
What I am commenting on is that pilots in this thread seem to be focused on the demise of AA at at the expense of NK's growth and as a pilot I'd want a company that has the best wages and QOL to succeed and have the others focused on keeping up. No I do not fly for AA.
The demise of AA? Who is talking about that in this thread?

Originally Posted by full of luv
I didn't get from Aa that they planned on matching nk on all markets but to just ensure that the unbundled crowd has an option on markets that they already compete in.
I did not listen to their call. I don't know why they are doing what they are doing. The point is something is different from the past years and if one works for NK this might be significant. Hence all this discussion. Well... hardly a discussion. It is me running my mouth with a few other guys the rest just wants to talk about the MEC and the TA and how they will both suck.

Last edited by Normann; 10-28-2015 at 09:23 AM. Reason: -I just saw you posted meanwhile-
Old 10-28-2015 | 09:56 AM
  #530  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

I dunno, I keep hearing "rumors" of some pretty good things . I also hear a TA is rigghhhttttttttttttt around the corner.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
De La Ghetto
Flight Schools and Training
22
11-26-2014 05:41 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
N618FT
Regional
34
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices