Trans States
12-11-2014, 02:13 PM
#5891
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,940
Originally Posted by TeamRamRod
Because for the non-moron, 50 seat vs 76 seat jet doesn't mean a damn thing. Does Delta/UAL/AA care one bit that you flew a 145 or a 175? Absolutely not.
I can't help but laugh at the genius' that went to RAH or SKW because "they wanted to fly the 175". Have fun putting that miniature gear lever up and down for half a decade, and then doing it at a major again for a former TSA guy that flew the 145 and got in and out in 2 years.
I can't help but laugh at the genius' that went to RAH or SKW because "they wanted to fly the 175". Have fun putting that miniature gear lever up and down for half a decade, and then doing it at a major again for a former TSA guy that flew the 145 and got in and out in 2 years.
12-11-2014, 02:24 PM
#5892
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 456
Originally Posted by TeamRamRod
Because for the non-moron, 50 seat vs 76 seat jet doesn't mean a damn thing. Does Delta/UAL/AA care one bit that you flew a 145 or a 175? Absolutely not.
I can't help but laugh at the genius' that went to RAH or SKW because "they wanted to fly the 175". Have fun putting that miniature gear lever up and down for half a decade, and then doing it at a major again for a former TSA guy that flew the 145 and got in and out in 2 years.
I can't help but laugh at the genius' that went to RAH or SKW because "they wanted to fly the 175". Have fun putting that miniature gear lever up and down for half a decade, and then doing it at a major again for a former TSA guy that flew the 145 and got in and out in 2 years.
12-11-2014, 02:27 PM
#5893
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Originally Posted by Squawk87
MRJ? Mystery Regional Jet?
E2 doesn't fit under current Major airlines scopes....
Anyway, you need shinny jets to attract brand new CFIs... I don't see why anyone who doesn't qualify for the CQFO program come to TSA to be a plain FO (unless they live in STL).
E2 doesn't fit under current Major airlines scopes....
Anyway, you need shinny jets to attract brand new CFIs... I don't see why anyone who doesn't qualify for the CQFO program come to TSA to be a plain FO (unless they live in STL).
12-11-2014, 05:01 PM
#5894
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 504
Originally Posted by Squawk87
MRJ? Mystery Regional Jet?
E2 doesn't fit under current Major airlines scopes....
Anyway, you need shinny jets to attract brand new CFIs... I don't see why anyone who doesn't qualify for the CQFO program come to TSA to be a plain FO (unless they live in STL).
E2 doesn't fit under current Major airlines scopes....
Anyway, you need shinny jets to attract brand new CFIs... I don't see why anyone who doesn't qualify for the CQFO program come to TSA to be a plain FO (unless they live in STL).
So, nice try.
12-11-2014, 05:24 PM
#5895
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: PA34-200
Posts: 145
Originally Posted by FlyingKat
I'll give you two real easy reasons. Our FOs make as much as a year two FO as a Mesa FO does in year four. Mesa has a line guarantee, not cancellation pay and that can mean an extra 20 hours a month with part 117 cancellations.
Originally Posted by Timma
You really have no idea what you are talking about... But have fun spouting garbage around the internet!
You completely missed my point, but whatever...
Good luck in finding regular FOs.
12-11-2014, 05:27 PM
#5896
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Originally Posted by Squawk87
It seems that many CFIs don't care about stuff like that....
12-11-2014, 05:34 PM
#5897
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: CE550B F/O
Posts: 116
Originally Posted by FlyingKat
Most of the ones I talk to do. Maybe they are brighter than you are and are smart enough to be more worried about the paycheck than the shiny jet.
Its becoming increasingly difficult to go directly from an only-corporate background to the Legacy/Major/LCCs, so we are forced to make the jump to get our 121 operating experience and right now is a good time to make the jump.
12-11-2014, 06:09 PM
#5898
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Originally Posted by Pilottim79
The E2 TSH has on order only has one more row and different engines than the regular 175. The E2 can be configured for 69 seats also. It fits under all scopes.
So, nice try.
So, nice try.
12-11-2014, 06:16 PM
#5899
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by BrewCity
E175 E2 MTOW is too heavy for AA, DAL, and UAL scope clauses.
12-11-2014, 06:18 PM
#5900
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Originally Posted by Timma
Ok. Why's everybody buying them then?
Scope Clauses May Affect Use Of New RJs | AWIN content from Aviation Week
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
